Literature DB >> 30887220

The association between sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery and spinopelvic parameters: a prospective multicenter study.

Juichi Tonosu1, Daisuke Kurosawa2, Takako Nishi3, Keisuke Ito4, Daijiro Morimoto5, Yoshiro Musha4, Hiroshi Ozawa6, Eiichi Murakami2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively calculate the incidence of postoperative sacroiliac joint-related pain (SIJP) and investigate the association between spinopelvic parameters and postoperative SIJP after lumbar spine surgery.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. We defined postoperative SIJP as unilateral buttock pain according to fulfillment of the following criteria within 3 months of the surgery: a sacroiliac joint (SIJ) score higher than 4/9 postoperatively; positive response to analgesic periarticular SIJ injection with fluoroscopy; no other complications related to the surgery. The patients were divided into the SIJP group and non-SIJP group. We compared the background information and analyzed the differences in spinopelvic parameters in both groups. Additionally, receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to evaluate the cutoff values of spinopelvic parameters.
RESULTS: Of the 281 patients enrolled, 265 were included and eight developed postoperative SIJP (3.0%). There were no significant differences in the background information between groups. Preoperative and postoperative radiological evaluations revealed that the pelvic incidence (PI) in the SIJP group was significantly higher than that in the non-SIJP group, and there were no significant differences in lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and PI minus LL. For preoperative PI, the area under the curve, cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.73739, 59, 62.5%, and 81.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative SIJP after lumbar spine surgery was 3.0%. Higher PI values were associated with a higher risk of postoperative SIJP. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar spine surgery; Pelvic incidence; Postoperative pain; Sacroiliac joint-related pain; Spinopelvic parameters

Year:  2019        PMID: 30887220     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05952-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

Review 1.  Low back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; J N Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  An electrophysiologic study of mechanoreceptors in the sacroiliac joint and adjacent tissues.

Authors:  N Sakamoto; T Yamashita; T Takebayashi; M Sekine; S Ishii
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; C A Planchon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; João Luiz Pinheiro-Franco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Sources of sacroiliac region pain: insights gained from a study comparing standard intra-articular injection with a technique combining intra- and peri-articular injection.

Authors:  Claude D Borowsky; Glenn Fagen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Diagram specific to sacroiliac joint pain site indicated by one-finger test.

Authors:  Eiichi Murakami; Toshimi Aizawa; Kyoko Noguchi; Haruo Kanno; Hiroshi Okuno; Hiroaki Uozumi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Effect of periarticular and intraarticular lidocaine injections for sacroiliac joint pain: prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Eiichi Murakami; Yasuhisa Tanaka; Toshimi Aizawa; Masato Ishizuka; Shoichi Kokubun
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 10.  European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Hanne B Albert; Hans Christian Ostgaard; Bengt Sturesson; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  MRI-guided sacroiliac joint injections in children and adults: current practice and future developments.

Authors:  Danoob Dalili; Amanda Isaac; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.128

2.  Characteristics of the spinopelvic parameters of patients with sacroiliac joint pain.

Authors:  Juichi Tonosu; Hiroyuki Oka; Kenichi Watanabe; Hiroaki Abe; Akiro Higashikawa; Takuya Kawai; Koji Yamada; Hiroyuki Nakarai; Sakae Tanaka; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Unexpected Sex Differences in the Relationship of Sacroiliac Joint and Lumbar Spine Degeneration.

Authors:  Maximilian Muellner; Virginie Kreutzinger; Luis Becker; Torsten Diekhoff; Matthias Pumberger; Friederike Schömig; Mark Heyland; Katharina Ziegeler
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

4.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum.

Authors:  Stacey J Ackerman; Gurvinder S Deol; David W Polly
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-08-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.