Literature DB >> 27770378

Predictors of Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Using 3-l of Polyethylene Glycol for an Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Chi-Liang Cheng1, Nai-Jen Liu2, Jui-Hsiang Tang3, Yen-Lin Kuo4, Hsiang-Ling Hung4, Yi-Ning Tsui4, Bai-Ping Lee4, Cheng-Hui Lin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 3-l polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution provided better bowel cleansing quality than a 2-l solution for outpatient colonoscopy. Predictors of suboptimal preparation using a 3-l PEG have not been previously reported. AIMS: To investigate the possible predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation using 3-l of PEG.
METHODS: We analyzed a database of 1404 consecutive colonoscopies during a 27-month period at a community hospital. A split-dose PEG regimen was provided for morning colonoscopies, and a same-day PEG regimen was provided for afternoon colonoscopies. The level of bowel cleansing was prospectively scored according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Possible predictors of suboptimal colon preparation, defined as a BBPS score <7, were analyzed using univariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The mean age of the study population (46.7 % men) was 52.5 years (range 20-80 years, SD 11.1 years), and the majority of patients (77.6 %) underwent morning colonoscopies. A suboptimal bowel preparation was reported in 17.2 % of the observed colonoscopies. In the multivariate regression analysis, constipation (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.22), male gender (OR 1.68, 95 % CI 1.25-2.25), obesity (OR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.29-2.41), and inadequate (<80 %) PEG consumption (OR 5.4, 95 % CI 2.67-10.89) were independent predictors of a suboptimal colon preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study identified that constipation, male gender, obesity, and inadequate intake of PEG were significant risk factors for suboptimal bowel preparation using a 3-l PEG solution for outpatient colonoscopy. Interventions of optimized colonoscopy preparation should be targeted at these patient populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol; Suboptimal bowel preparation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770378     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4343-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  34 in total

1.  Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Patricia Wren; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Grace H Elta; Stephanie Foster; Sheryl Korsnes; Brittany Graustein; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R M Ness; R Manam; H Hoen; N Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: what are the predictors of an inadequate preparation?

Authors:  Ruby Yee; Shiana Manoharan; Christine Hall; Allen Hayashi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution (golytely) in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study.

Authors:  C Taylor; M L Schubert
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Lauren M Stossel; Julia L Cooperman; Joshua Graff Zivin; Uri Ladabaum; Diana Hall; Linda D Thélémaque; William Redd; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaodong Liu; Hui Luo; Lin Zhang; Felix W Leung; Zhiguo Liu; Xiangping Wang; Rui Huang; Na Hui; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Brian B Borg; Nitin K Gupta; Gary R Zuckerman; Bhaskar Banerjee; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  Wah-Kheong Chan; Arjunan Saravanan; Jeeta Manikam; Khean-Lee Goh; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predicting Suboptimal Bowel Preparation: Taking It Up a PEG.

Authors:  Shaheel M Sahebally
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Risk Factors Associated with Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Patients with Functional Constipation.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Guo; Xin Shi; Xiaoyu Kang; Hui Luo; Xiangping Wang; Hui Jia; Qin Tao; Jingjie Wang; Mingxin Zhang; Jinhai Wang; Xiaolan Lu; Shiyang Ma; Tao Lin; Yujie Jing; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Predictive factors of inadequate bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amir Sadeghi; Mohsen Rajabnia; Mohammad Bagheri; Shaghayegh Jamshidizadeh; Samane Saberi; Paria Shahnazi; Leila Pasharavesh; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mona Mirzaei; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2022

4.  A Theory-based Educational Pamphlet With Low-residue Diet Improves Colonoscopy Attendance and Bowel Preparation Quality.

Authors:  Valerie Gausman; Giulio Quarta; Michelle H Lee; Natalia Chtourmine; Carmelita Ganotisi; Frances Nanton-Gonzalez; Chui Ling Ng; Jungwon Jun; Leslie Perez; Jason A Dominitz; Scott E Sherman; Michael A Poles; Peter S Liang
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.174

5.  Factors Affecting Proximal Colon Cleansing Based on Bowel Movement Kinetics: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Dae Bum Kim; Kang-Moon Lee; Sung-Goo Kang; Sung Hoon Jung
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation in overweight and obese adults: subanalysis by body mass index from a phase III, assessor-blinded study.

Authors:  Lawrence Hookey; Gerald Bertiger; Kenneth Lee Johnson; Mena Boules; Masakazu Ando; David N Dahdal
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.409

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.