Literature DB >> 27765929

Association of the miR-17-5p variants with susceptibility to cervical cancer in a Chinese population.

Tianbo Jin1,2,3,4, Xiaohong Wu5, Hua Yang4, Ming Liu6, Yongjun He1,2,3, Xue He1,2,3, Xugang Shi4, Fengjiao Wang4, Shuli Du4, Yajuan Ma4, Shan Bao7, Dongya Yuan1,2,3.   

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are key regulators of gene expression; however, the extent to which single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) interfere with miRNA gene regulation and affect cervical cancer (CC) susceptibility remains largely unknown. Here, we systematically analyzed miRNA-related SNPs and their association with CC risk, and performed a case-control study of miR-17-5p SNPs and CC risk in a Chinese population. Sixteen SNPs were genotyped in 247 CC cases and 285 controls. Three were associated with CC risk (p < 0.05): the minor allele (A) of rs217727 in H19 increased risk (OR = 1.53, p = 0.002), while the minor alleles (T) of rs9931702 and (T) of rs9302648 in AKTIP decreased CC risk (p = 0.018, p = 0.014). Analysis of the SNPs after stratification based on CC clinical stage and subtype revealed that rs1048512, rs6659346, rs217727, rs9931702, and rs9302648 were associated with CC risk in clinical stages I-II; rs2862833, rs2732044, rs1030389, and rs1045935 were associated with CC risk in clinical stages III-IV; and rs217727, rs9931702, and rs9302648 were associated with CC risk in squamous carcinomas. These data could serve as a useful resource for understanding the miR-17 function, identification of miRNAs associated with CC, and development of better CC screening strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case-control studies; cervical cancer; miR-17-5p; single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765929      PMCID: PMC5363537          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most common cancer among women worldwide [1, 2]. Even though more than 95% of CC patients are infected with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV infection alone is not sufficient to cause cervical cancer [3-5]. Cervical cancer is thought to be a multifactorial and complex disease that results from the interaction between heredity and environment. In addition, epidemiological studies have suggested that host genetic variations may contribute to CC pathogenesis [6]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, endogenous, non-coding RNA molecules, which are about 21–23 nucleotides in length, and regulate gene expression by translational repression or mRNA degradation [7]. MiRNAs are involved in various biological processes, including cell proliferation, cell death, and fat metabolism [8]. The miR-17-5p originates from the mature microRNA gene product of the miR-17 gene precursor 5p. Abnormal expression of miR-17-5p has been observed in different types of cancer, including lung [9, 10], pancreatic [11], liver [12], breast [13], gastric [14], and cervical cancer [15], suggesting that miR-17- 5p may have an important role in cancer occurrence and development. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are important variations determining the diversity among individuals; they cause different phenotypes, traits, and diseases [16]. Since miRNAs are key regulators of gene expression, miRNA-related SNPs including SNPs in miRNA genes and target sites may affect phenotypes and disease susceptibility [17]. Moreover, SNPs located in miRNAs are likely to affect miRNAs maturation, functional strand selection, and target selection. To date, a number of studies have demonstrated that SNPs in target sites or miRNA genes are associated with various diseases [17-19]. For example, the functional SNP in pre-miR-146a may contribute to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma susceptibility and clinical outcome. miR-196a-2 might have an oncogenic role in breast tumorigenesis, and the functional genetic variant in its mature region could serve as a novel biomarker for breast cancer susceptibility. In this study, we performed a screening for common SNPs in miR-17-5p sequence and evaluated 16 SNPs with respect to their association with the susceptibility to cervical cancer in a Chinese population.

RESULTS

Selected characteristics of 247 CC cases and 285 cancer-free controls are summarized in Table 1. Of the 247 CC cases, 149 had stage I-II carcinoma, and 91 cases had stage III-IV carcinoma. There were 88 squamous carcinoma cases, and 239 adenocarcinoma cases. The observed genotype distributions for the 16 SNP loci polymorphisms in controls and patients were consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05). Using the χ2 test, 3 SNPs were associated with an increased or reduced risk of cervical cancer (p < 0.05; Table 2). Among them, the minor allele (A) of rs217727 in the H19 gene increased the risk (OR = 1.53, 95% CI, 1.17–2.02, p = 0.002), while the minor allele (T) of rs9931702, and the minor allele (T) of rs9302648 in the AKTIP gene decreased the risk of cervical cancer (OR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.56–0.95, p = 0.018; OR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.55–0.94, p = 0.014).
Table 1

Distributions of selected variables in CC cases

CharacteristicsCases
Number247
Age≤ 54132
> 54115
Clinical stagesI- II149
III- IV91
Subtypesquamous carcinomas8
adenocarcinoma239
Table 2

Frequency distributions of alleles and their associations with cervical cancer

SNPChromosomeBandGene (s)Alleles A/BMAF (case)MAF (control)HWE-POR (95% CI)P
rs104851211q23.2PIGMA/G0.0990.1120.230.87 (0.59–1.29)0.489
rs665934611q23.2PIGMA/G0.1110.1180.150.94 (0.64–1.37)0.751
rs110063691010q11.23SGMS1T/A0.1210.0930.721.35 (0.91–1.99)0.133
rs28628331010q23.31FASG/A0.4900.4560.151.14 (0.90–1.46)0.272
rs37412161111p15.5H19A/T0.0770.0740.381.05 (0.66–1.65)0.842
rs2177271111p15.5H19A/G0.3150.2310.741.53 (1.17–2.02)0.002
rs28397021111p15.5H19C/A0.3560.3840.130.88 (0.69–1.44)0.337
rs20670511111p15.5MIR675T/C0.3360.3760.100.84 (0.65–1.08)0.180
rs22740621313q22.2LMO7A/T0.4530.4980.150.84 (0.66–1.06)0.145
rs93183751313q22.2LMO7T/A0.0430.0580.240.72 (0.41–1.27)0.254
rs27320441515q11.2SNORD109BA/G0.4270.4420.900.94 (0.74–1.20)0.623
rs10303891515q11.2SNORD109BG/A0.4390.4670.340.90 (0.70–1.14)0.371
rs10459351515q11.2SNORD109BG/T0.5400.4860.721.24 (0.98–1.58)0.076
rs129027101515q21.3PIGBC/T0.5000.4610.341.17 (0.92–1.49)0.209
rs99317021616q12.2AKTIPT/C0.2710.3390.900.73 (0.56–0.95)0.018
rs93026481616q12.2AKTIPT/G0.2690.3390.900.72 (0.55–0.94)0.014

p- value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

HWE, Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium; MAF, minor allele frequency; ORs, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval.

p- value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance. HWE, Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium; MAF, minor allele frequency; ORs, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval. As shown in Table 3, for rs2862833, the genotype “G/G” was associated with a decreased risk of cervical cancer in the dominant model (OR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.46–0.92, p = 0.013). The logistic regression analysis revealed that the rs568408 GG genotypes compared with the AA/GA genotypes were associated with a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer in a recessive genetic model (OR = 1.66, 95% CI, 1.11–2.50, p = 0.014). Compared with the GG genotype, the AG and AA of rs217727 polymorphism in CC patients differed from the controls (AG vs GG, OR = 1.50, 95% CI, 1.05–2.16; AA vs GG, OR = 2.35, 95% CI, 1.21–4.57; p = 0.0097; AG/AA vs GG, OR = 1.62, 95% CI, 1.15–2.29, p = 0.0059). Similarly, variant rs9931702 TC genotypes were associated with a reduced CC risk (TC vs CC, OR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.46 – 0.95, p = 0.045; TC/TT vs CC, OR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.46 – 0.92, p = 0.013) compared with the wild-type rs3212227 CC. The genotype “C/T-T/T” of rs9302648 was associated with a decreased risk of cervical cancer in the dominant model (OR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.46–0.92, p = 0.013), and in the codominant model (GT vs GG, OR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.46 – 0.96, p = 0.042). No association was observed between the rest of the polymorphism and the CC risk. Using Bonfferroni correction, we have not found any SNPs to have a significant risk (p < 0.05/16*5).
Table 3

The associations between the gene polymorphisms of cervical cancer patients

ModelGenotypecontrolcaseOR (95% CI)P-value
rs2862833CodominantA/A78 (27.4%)73 (29.6%)10.016
G/A154 (54%)106 (42.9%)0.74 (0.49–1.10)
G/G53 (18.6%)68 (27.5%)1.37 (0.85–2.22)
DominantA/A78 (27.4%)73 (29.6%)10.58
G/A-G/G207 (72.6%)174 (70.5%)0.90 (0.62–1.31)
RecessiveA/A-G/A232 (81.4%)179 (72.5%)10.014
G/G53 (18.6%)68 (27.5%)1.66 (1.11–2.50)
Log-additive---------1.14 (0.90–1.45)0.28
rs217727CodominantG/G169 (59.5%)117 (47.6%)10.0097
A/G99 (34.9%)103 (41.9%)1.50 (1.05–2.16)
A/A16 (5.6%)26 (10.6%)2.35 (1.21–4.57)
DominantG/G169 (59.5%)117 (47.6%)10.0059
A/G-A/A115 (40.5%)129 (52.4%)1.62 (1.15–2.29)
RecessiveG/G-A/G268 (94.4%)220 (89.4%)10.036
A/A16 (5.6%)26 (10.6%)1.98 (1.04–3.78)
Log-additive---------1.52 (1.16–1.99)0.0023
rs9931702CodominantC/C124 (43.5%)134 (54.2%)10.045
T/C129 (45.3%)92 (37.2%)0.66 (0.46–0.95)
T/T32 (11.2%)21 (8.5%)0.61 (0.33–1.11)
DominantC/C124 (43.5%)134 (54.2%)10.013
T/C-T/T161 (56.5%)113 (45.8%)0.65 (0.46–0.92)
RecessiveC/C-T/C253 (88.8%)226 (91.5%)10.29
T/T32 (11.2%)21 (8.5%)0.73 (0.41–1.31)
Log-additive---------0.73 (0.56–0.95)0.019
rs9302648CodominantG/G124 (43.5%)134 (54.2%)10.042
G/T129 (45.3%)93 (37.6%)0.67 (0.46–0.96)
T/T32 (11.2%)20 (8.1%)0.58 (0.31–1.06)
DominantG/G124 (43.5%)134 (54.2%)10.013
G/T-T/T161 (56.5%)113 (45.8%)0.65 (0.46–0.92)
RecessiveG/G-G/T253 (88.8%)227 (91.9%)10.22
T/T32 (11.2%)20 (8.1%)0.70 (0.39–1.25)
Log-additive---------0.72 (0.56–0.94)0.015

p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

CI, confidence interval; ORs, odds ratios;

p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance. CI, confidence interval; ORs, odds ratios; Linkage disequilibrium (LD) and haplotype analyses of the SNPs in CC patients and control samples were further studied (Figure 1). The results of the association between the H19 and AKTIP haplotype and the risk of cervical cancer are listed in Table 4. Compared with the GCT wild type, carriers of AAC (rs217727, rs2839702, rs2067051) haplotypes had significant associations with increased susceptibility to cervical cancer (OR = 1.51, 95% CI, 1.11 - 2.06, p = 0.0094). For the rs9931702 and rs9302648 in the AKTIP gene, compared with the TT wild type, carriers of CG haplotypes had significant associations with decreased CC risk (OR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.56–0.94, p = 0.016).
Figure 1

Haplotype block map for the SNPs genotyped in this study

Brighter red represents stronger LD (LOD = 2, D′ = 1)

Table 4

The haplotype frequencies of gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk

rs217727rs2839702rs2067051FreqOR (95% CI)P-value
GCT0.35091---
GAC0.35050.98 (0.75–1.29)0.9
AAC0.27041.51 (1.11–2.06)0.0094
GCC0.02031.28 (0.53–3.12)0.58

CI, confidence interval; ORs, odds ratios; p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Haplotype block map for the SNPs genotyped in this study

Brighter red represents stronger LD (LOD = 2, D′ = 1) CI, confidence interval; ORs, odds ratios; p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Stratified analysis of the effect of these SNPs polymorphisms on cervical cancer by clinical stages and subtype is shown in Table 5. The results indicate that rs1048512, rs6659346, rs217727, rs9931702, and rs9302648 are associated with CC risk in clinical stages of I-II, while rs2862833, rs2732044, rs1030389, and rs1045935 are associated with CC risk in clinical stages of III-IV. Concerning subtypes, rs217727, rs9931702, and rs9302648 are associated with CC risk in squamous carcinomas, while there is no association of SNPs in adenocarcinoma.
Table 5

The associations between the gene polymorphisms and clinical characteristics of cervical cancer patients

SNPclinical stagessubtype
I- IIIII- IVSquamous carcinomasadenocarcinoma
OR (95%CI)p OR (95%CI)p OR (95%CI)p
rs10485120.57 (0.34–0.96)0.0331.38 (0.85–2.24)0.1940.88 (0.59–1.31)0.5360.53 (0.07–4.06)0.532
rs66593460.60 (0.36–0.99)0.0441.54 (0.97–2.45)0.0660.96 (0.65–1.4)0.8180.5 (0.07–3.85)0.498
rs110063691.47 (0.95–2.28)0.0851.2 (0.7–2.07)0.5021.32 (0.89–1.96)0.1672.25 (0.62–8.15)0.205
rs28628331.01 (0.77–1.34)0.9201.45 (1.04–2.03)0.0281.12 (0.87–1.42)0.3812.62 (0.9–7.65)0.067
rs37412160.71 (0.39–1.29)0.2631.55 (0.89–2.72)0.1221.02 (0.64–1.63)0.9201.8 (0.39–8.17)0.442
rs2177271.81 (1.33–2.46)0.0001.23 (0.84–1.8)0.2891.55 (1.18–2.04)0.0021.11 (0.35–3.51)0.856
rs28397020.86 (0.64–1.15)0.3080.86 (0.61–1.22)0.4090.88 (0.69–1.14)0.3310.96 (0.34–2.68)0.940
rs20670510.76 (0.56–1.03)0.0730.92 (0.65–1.3)0.6230.84 (0.65–1.08)0.1701 (0.36–2.78)0.994
rs22740620.77 (0.58–1.02)0.0670.99 (0.71–1.38)0.9300.83 (0.65–1.06)0.1341.01 (0.37–2.72)0.989
rs93183750.98 (0.54–1.80)0.9590.37 (0.13–1.05)0.0510.71 (0.4–1.26)0.2371.08 (0.14–8.47)0.938
rs27320441.10 (0.83–1.46)0.4940.7 (0.5–0.99)0.0430.93 (0.73–1.19)0.5711.26 (0.47–3.41)0.646
rs10303891.04 (0.79–1.38)0.7830.68 (0.48–0.96)0.0280.89 (0.7–1.13)0.3411.14 (0.42–3.09)0.792
rs10459351.07 (0.81–1.42)0.6270.6 (0.43–0.85)0.0040.79 (0.62–1)0.0530.63 (0.23–1.77)0.381
rs129027101.25 (0.94–1.65)0.1211.02 (0.73–1.43)0.8951.15 (0.9–1.46)0.2671.95 (0.7–5.42)0.196
rs99317020.68 (0.50–0.93)0.0150.87 (0.61–1.24)0.4410.75 (0.57–0.97)0.0290.28 (0.06–1.24)0.074
rs93026480.68 (0.50–0.93)0.0150.85 (0.59–1.21)0.3630.74 (0.57–0.96)0.0240.28 (0.06–1.24)0.074

CI, confidence interval; ORs, odds ratios; p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

CI, confidence interval; ORs, odds ratios; p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

The association between the SNPs and cancer risk has been investigated extensively. However, few studies concerning the SNPs in miRNA genes associated with cancer are available. In the present case-control study, we focused on the association between SNPs involved in the miR-17-5p with the cervical cancer risk in Chinese women. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show miR-17-5p SNPs polymorphisms in cervical cancer. We have found that four SNPs (rs217727, rs2862833, rs9931702, and rs9302648) of 16SNPs in the miR-17-5p are associated with cervical cancer risk. MicroRNAs are small endogenous noncoding RNAs that function as post-transcriptional regulators, and control genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle, proliferation, and cell death [20-22]. The miR-17-5p originates from the mature microRNA gene product of the miR-17 gene precursor 5p. The miR-17-92 gene cluster is a highly conserved gene cluster that encodes miR-17-5p, miR-17-3p, miR-18a, miR-19a, miR-20a, miR-19b-1 and miR-92-1 [23]. Expression of the miR-17-92 gene cluster is increased in several cancers, including colorectal, lung, pancreatic, and liver cancer. miR-17-5p acts as a tumor suppressor in prostate, cervical, and breast cancer. In addition, miR-17-5p and miR-20a are involved in c-Myc-modulated E2F1 expression. Inhibition of miR-17-5p and miR-20a in a cervical cancer cell line upregulates the E2F1 oncogene [24]. In addition, miR-17-5p and miR-20a alleviate the suppressive function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by modulating STAT3 expression [25], and miR-17-5p functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting TP53INP1 in cervical cancer cells. Our findings confirm the observations that rs217727 in H19 gene is associated with cervical cancer. The H19 gene is located in a cluster with the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene on chromosome 11p15.5. The H19 gene does not encode for a protein, but instead codes for a capped, spliced, and polyadenylated 2.7-kb RNA that plays important roles in embryonic development and growth control [26]. However, H19 expression is reduced after birth, and its expression is only found in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Increasing evidence suggests that H19 is abnormally expressed in breast, liver, lung, cervical, esophageal, and bladder tumors [27, 28], and promotes cancer cell proliferation, suggesting an oncogenic function. The C/T polymorphism rs217727 is located in exon 5 of the H19 gene. Although the rs217727 polymorphism (C > T) does not affect H19 mRNA expression levels, mutation may alter the translational efficiency, potentially leading to alterations in H19 structure, which may ultimately influence the function of H19. H19 is abnormally expressed in several tumors, and acts as either a tumor suppressor [28, 29], or an oncogene [30]. Increasing evidence suggests that H19 genetic variants play important roles in cancer development as well as other diseases. For example, Gao et al. [31] found that rs217727C to T variant was associated with increased coronary artery disease risk (CAD). In another study, maternal H19 rs217727 TT genotype was associated with a higher birth weight. A previous study by Yang et al. [32] evaluated the effects of 4 independent SNPs (H19 rs217727, rs2839698, rs3741216, and rs3741219) on gastric cancer risk in the Chinese population and suggested that the T allele of rs217727 was associated with higher risk of gastric cancer. Rs9931702 and rs9302648 are located in the AKTIP gene. AKT-interacting protein (AKTIP) is a cell membrane protein that interacts with protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt and modulates PKB activity by enhancing PKB's phosphorylation and interaction with the upstream kinase phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1). However, the exact biological function of AKTIP is not fully understood. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the AKTIP function and its association with cervical cancer risk. We stratified analysis of the effect of these SNPs polymorphisms on cervical cancer by subtype. The results indicated that there was no same SNPs have significance in different subtypes. The phenomenon suggested that the pathogenesis of CC different organizations vary. This played an important role for us to study the clinical pathological features and clinical guide and in predicting prognosis. These data will Our results should serve as a useful resource for understanding the miR-17 function and identification of miRNAs associated with cervical cancer. Better understanding of the miR-17-5p function and identification of other CC-associated miRNAs will increase our understanding of the CC etiology and provide new strategies for CC screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study participants

This case-control study included 247 patients with cervical cancer and 285 healthy controls. All CC cases were newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed CC patients consecutively recruited between 2015 and 2016, from Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University. Patients' evaluations were performed by trained medical personnel as per the guidelines outlined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Patients who had history of cancer, chromosomal abnormalities, or radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded from the study. The cancer-free control group consisted of women in good health and with no malignancy history, who were recruited during regular gynecological examinations. All women were interviewed and given an epidemiological questionnaire that included age, ethnicity, residential region, diet, and family history of cervical cancer. All subjects were genetically unrelated Chinese Uighur. After informed consent was obtained, 5 ml of peripheral blood sample was collected from each subject. This study was approved by Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University and Xizang Minzu University.

SNP selection and genotyping

SNPs were selected based on published studies demonstrating an association with cancer [27–28, 31–33], and by using search of HapMap and dbSNP (Chinese population). Only SNPs, which may impact miRNA:LncRNA interaction according to the lncRNASNP database and limited the minimum allele frequency of SNPs in the Chinese population(CHB) > 5%, were selected. Finally, 16 SNPs were selected as candidate SNPs. GoldMag-Mini Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GoldMag Co. Ltd. Xi'an City, China) was used to extract DNA from the whole blood. DNA concentration was measured by NanoDrop 2000 (Gene Company Limited). Sequenom MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 Software was used to design a Multiplexed SNP MassEXTEND assay [34]. Sequenom MassARRAY RS1000 was used for genotyping, and the data were managed using Sequenom Typer 4.0 Software [34, 35]. Primers used for this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Laboratory personnel were blinded to the genotyping results of all samples.

Statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel and SPSS 21.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL) were used to perform statistical analyses. All p values in this study were two-sided and differences were considered significant if p-value was less than 0.05. The genotypic distribution of each SNP in control subjects was tested for departure from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) using an exact test. We compared the allele frequencies of cases and controls using the Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests. The association between genotypes and disease risks was evaluated by computing the odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using multiple logistic regression analysis. The most common genotype in the controls was used as the reference group. Associations between the selected SNPs and the risk of cervical cancer were assessed using genotypic model analysis (co-dominant, dominant, recessive, and log-additive) by SNP stats, a website software program available at http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/snpstats/start.htm. We used the Haploview software package (version 4.2) and SHEsis software platform (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php) for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci. D′ value > 0.8 indicated that the related SNPs formed one block [36, 37]. In analysis of subtype and clinical stages, we examined associations separately for women with different squamous carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and clinical stages I- II, III- IV, each compared to all controls.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show miR-17-5p SNPs polymorphisms in cervical cancer. We demonstrate that four SNPs (rs217727, rs2862833, rs9931702, and rs9302648) of 16SNPs in the miR-17-5p are associated with cervical cancer risk. Large well-designed and population-based studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
  36 in total

1.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Small RNAs: classification, biogenesis, and function.

Authors:  V Narry Kim
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 3.  The huge world of small RNAs: regulating networks of microRNAs (review).

Authors:  Zs Rácz; T Kaucsár; P Hamar
Journal:  Acta Physiol Hung       Date:  2011-09

Review 4.  MicroRNA regulation by RNA-binding proteins and its implications for cancer.

Authors:  Marieke van Kouwenhove; Martijn Kedde; Reuven Agami
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  c-Myc-regulated microRNAs modulate E2F1 expression.

Authors:  Kathryn A O'Donnell; Erik A Wentzel; Karen I Zeller; Chi V Dang; Joshua T Mendell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Upregulated H19 contributes to bladder cancer cell proliferation by regulating ID2 expression.

Authors:  Ming Luo; Zuowei Li; Wei Wang; Yigang Zeng; Zhihong Liu; Jianxin Qiu
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.542

7.  miR-17-5p as a novel prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Meng Jiang; Weijie Yuan; Huihuan Tang
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  Circulating miR-17-5p and miR-20a: molecular markers for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mei Wang; Hongbing Gu; Sheng Wang; Hui Qian; Wei Zhu; Ling Zhang; Chonghui Zhao; Yang Tao; Wenrong Xu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.952

9.  Mutations in the seed region of human miR-96 are responsible for nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss.

Authors:  Angeles Mencía; Silvia Modamio-Høybjør; Nick Redshaw; Matías Morín; Fernando Mayo-Merino; Leticia Olavarrieta; Luis A Aguirre; Ignacio del Castillo; Karen P Steel; Tamas Dalmay; Felipe Moreno; Miguel Angel Moreno-Pelayo
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Tag SNPs in long non-coding RNA H19 contribute to susceptibility to gastric cancer in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Ran Tang; Xiang Ma; Younan Wang; Dakui Luo; Zekuan Xu; Yi Zhu; Li Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-20
View more
  8 in total

1.  Genetic variants in long noncoding RNA H19 contribute to the risk of breast cancer in a southeast China Han population.

Authors:  Yuxiang Lin; Fangmeng Fu; Yazhen Chen; Wei Qiu; Songping Lin; Peidong Yang; Meng Huang; Chuan Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  miR‑17‑5p regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of human trabecular meshwork cells by targeting phosphatase and tensin homolog.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Wang; Zhijian Li; Jie Bai; Wuqi Song; Fengmin Zhang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.952

3.  Association study between the polymorphisms of angiogenesis-related genes and cervical cancer susceptibility in Chinese Uygur population.

Authors:  Lili Han; Sulaiya Husaiyin; Chunhua Ma; Mayinuer Niyazi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Evidences from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Unveil the Role of MiRNA Polymorphisms in the Predisposition to Female Neoplasms.

Authors:  Milad Bastami; Jalal Choupani; Zahra Saadatian; Sepideh Zununi Vahed; Elaheh Ouladsahebmadarek; Yasser Mansoori; Abdolreza Daraei; Hossein Samadi Kafil; Bahman Yousefi; Mahdi Mahdipour; Andrea Masotti; Ziba Nariman-Saleh-Fam
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The clinicopathological characteristic associations of long non-coding RNA gene H19 polymorphisms with uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ming-Chao Huang; Ying-Hsiang Chou; Huang-Pin Shen; Soo-Cheen Ng; Yueh-Chun Lee; Yi-Hung Sun; Chun-Fang Hsu; Shun-Fa Yang; Po-Hui Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  MiR-22-3p Regulates Cell Proliferation and Inhibits Cell Apoptosis through Targeting the eIF4EBP3 Gene in Human Cervical Squamous Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Kang-Tai Lv; Zhu Liu; Jie Feng; Wei Zhao; Tao Hao; Wen-Yan Ding; Jing-Ping Chu; Ling-Juan Gao
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Association between lncRNA H19 rs217727 polymorphism and the risk of cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Jialing Zhong; Fang Chen; Kang Hu; Suhong Sun; Yuanxiu Leng; Xumei Chen; Fengjiao Gan; Yana Pan; Qing Luo
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  Significant association between long non-coding RNA H19 polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis and bioinformatics prediction.

Authors:  Wei Li; Xia Jiang; Xiaojing Jin; Weitao Yan; Ying Liu; Dongyun Li; Zengren Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.