| Literature DB >> 31772651 |
Ming-Chao Huang1,2,3, Ying-Hsiang Chou1,4,5, Huang-Pin Shen1,6,7, Soo-Cheen Ng6,7, Yueh-Chun Lee1,5,7, Yi-Hung Sun1,8, Chun-Fang Hsu1,6, Shun-Fa Yang1,9, Po-Hui Wang1,6,7,9.
Abstract
The purposes of the current study were conducted to explore the relationships among long non-coding RNA gene H19 (LncRNA H19) polymorphisms and clinicopathological characteristics of uterine cervical cancer, and patient prognosis in Taiwan. Five genetic variants of LncRNA H19 rs3024270, rs2839698, rs3741219, rs2107425 and rs217727 were recruited from one hundred and thirty-four patients with invasive cancer, 101 with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of uterine cervix and 325 controls and their genetic distributions were determined. It indicated no associations of these LncRNA H19 genetic variants with development of cervical cancer. CC/CT in LncRNA H19 rs2839698 exhibited less risk to have pelvic lymph node metastasis [Odds ratio (OR): 0.19, 95% Confidence interval (CI):0.04-0.82, p=0.028)], as compared with TT. Meanwhile, cervical cancer patients with AA/AG in rs3741219 also had less risk to develop pelvic lymph node metastasis (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05-0.63, p=0.008), large tumor (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.82, p=0.014) as well as parametrium (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.07-0.95, p=0.045) and vagina invasion (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.91, p=0.041, as compared to those with GG. However, only positive pelvic lymph node metastasis was related to worse recurrence-free survival and poor overall survival. Conclusively, it indicated no association of LncRNA H19 SNPs with cervical carcinogensis in Taiwanese women. Although genotypes TT in LncRNA H19 rs2839698 and GG in rs3741219 are related to some poor clinicopathological parameters of cervical cancer, only pelvic lymph node status could predict 5 year patient survival significantly. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: 5 year survival; clinicopathological characteristics; long non-coding RNA gene H19; lymph node metastasis; uterine cervical cancer
Year: 2019 PMID: 31772651 PMCID: PMC6856740 DOI: 10.7150/jca.36707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Genetic variant frequencies of the H19 gene in Taiwanese women with uterine cervical neoplasias and normal controls
| Genetic polymorphisms | Normal controls (n =325) | Cervical neoplasiasa (n=235) | ORs (95% CIs) | AORs (95% CIs)b | Adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.512 | 0.371 | |||||
| CCc | 71 | 51 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CG | 150 | 120 | 1.11 (0.72-1.72) | 1.11 (0.71-1.74) | 0.651 | |
| GG | 95 | 60 | 0.88 (0.54-1.43) | 0.82 (0.50-1.36) | 0.445 | |
| CCc | 71 | 51 | 1.00 | 0.914 | 1.00 | 0.984 |
| CG/GG | 245 | 180 | 1.02 (0.68-1.54) | 1.00 (0.65-1.52) | ||
| GGc | 95 | 60 | 1.00 | 0.295 | 1.00 | 0.183 |
| CC/CG | 221 | 171 | 1.23 (0.84-1.79) | 1.31 (0.88-1.94) | ||
| 0.936 | 0.981 | |||||
| CCc | 154 | 115 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 134 | 99 | 0.99 (0.69-1.41) | 1.04 (0.72-1.50) | 0.849 | |
| TT | 30 | 20 | 089 (0.48-1.65) | 1.00 (0.72-1.50) | 0.991 | |
| CCc | 154 | 115 | 1.00 | 0.868 | 1.00 | 0.866 |
| CT/TT | 164 | 119 | 0.97 (0.69-1.36) | 1.03 (0.73-1.46) | ||
| TTc | 30 | 20 | 1.00 | 0.720 | 1.00 | 0.967 |
| CC/CT | 288 | 214 | 1.12 (0.62-2.02) | 1.01 (0.55-1.87) | ||
| 0.875 | 0.895 | |||||
| AAc | 152 | 112 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| AG | 130 | 100 | 1.04 (0.73-1.49) | 1.09 (0.75-1.58) | 0.649 | |
| GG | 32 | 21 | 0.89 (0.49-1.63) | 1.00 (0.54-1.88) | 0.989 | |
| AAc | 152 | 112 | 1.00 | 0.937 | 1.00 | 0.692 |
| AG/GG | 162 | 121 | 1.01 (0.72-1.42) | 1.07 (0.76-1.53) | ||
| GGc | 32 | 21 | 1.00 | 0.645 | 1.00 | 0.906 |
| AA/AG | 282 | 212 | 1.15 (0.64-2.04) | 1.04 (0.57-1.89) | ||
| 0.684 | 0.474 | |||||
| CCc | 109 | 88 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 155 | 107 | 0.86 (0.59-1.24) | 0.79 (0.54-1.17) | 0.236 | |
| TT | 48 | 38 | 0.98 (0.59-1.63) | 0.94 (0.56-1.59) | 0.823 | |
| CCc | 109 | 88 | 1.00 | 0.496 | 1.00 | 0.308 |
| CT/TT | 203 | 145 | 0.89 (0.62-1.26) | 0.83 (0.57-1.19) | ||
| TTc | 48 | 38 | 1.00 | 0.770 | 1.00 | 0.762 |
| CC/CT | 264 | 195 | 0.93 (0.59-1.48) | 0.93 (0.58-1.50) | ||
| 0.875 | 0.855 | |||||
| CCc | 135 | 102 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.632 | |
| CT | 139 | 103 | 0.98 (0.68 (1.41) | 0.91 (0.63-1.33) | 0.663 | |
| TT | 39 | 28 | 0.95 (0.55-1.65) | 0.88 (0.50-1.56) | ||
| CCc | 135 | 102 | 1.00 | 0.880 | 1.00 | 0.584 |
| CT/TT | 178 | 131 | 0.97 (0.69-1.37) | 0.91 (0.63-1.29) | ||
| TTc | 39 | 28 | 1.00 | 0.876 | 1.00 | 0.771 |
| CC/CT | 274 | 205 | 1.04 (0.62-1.75) | 1.08 (0.63-1.85) |
Statistical analysis: logistic regression model or chi-square test. aCervical neoplasias included precancerous lesions and invasive cancer of the uterine cervix. bThe adjusted p values as well as adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confident intervals were examined by logistic regression model after controlling for age. cUsed as a reference for comparison to determine the odds ratios of other genotypes. 95% CIs, 95% confidence intervals.
Genetic variant frequencies of H19 in Taiwanese women with invasive cancer or precancerous lesions of uterine cervix and normal controls
| Genetic polymorphisms | Normal controls (n =325) | Pre-cancerous lesions (n =101) | Invasive cancer | AORs | Ad. | AORs | Ad. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCc | 71 | 25 | 26 | 0.629 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CG | 150 | 51 | 69 | 1.41 (0.81-2.45) | 0.228 | 1.31 (0.78-2.20) | 0.299 | |
| GG | 95 | 23 | 37 | 1.46 (0.77-2.78) | 0.252 | 0.98 (0.51-1.86) | 0.945 | |
| CCc | 71 | 25 | 26 | 0.601 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CG/GG | 245 | 74 | 106 | 0.86 (0.51-1.45) | 0.565 | 1.22 (0.70-2.11) | 0.490 | |
| GGc | 95 | 23 | 37 | 0.419 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CC/CG | 221 | 76 | 95 | 1.42 (0.84-2.41) | 0.188 | 1.20 (0.74-1.96) | 0.455 | |
| CCc | 154 | 46 | 69 | 0.820 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 134 | 45 | 54 | 1.01 (0.46-2.22) | 0.988 | 1.11 (0.47-2.60) | 0.815 | |
| TT | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0.89 (0.41-1.97) | 0.781 | 1.15 (0.50-2.67) | 0.739 | |
| CCc | 154 | 46 | 69 | 0.622 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT/TT | 164 | 55 | 64 | 1.12 (0.72-1.76) | 0.611 | 0.94 (0.61-1.47) | 0.798 | |
| TTc | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0.769 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CC/CT | 288 | 91 | 123 | 0.95 (0.45-2.01) | 0.886 | 1.13 (0.50-2.56) | 0.764 | |
| AAc | 152 | 44 | 68 | 0.869 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| AG | 130 | 46 | 54 | 1.22 (0.76-1.97) | 0.407 | 0.98 (0.62-1.56) | 0.928 | |
| GG | 32 | 9 | 12 | 0.97 (0.43-2.20) | 0.947 | 1.01 (0.46-2.22) | 0.988 | |
| AAc | 152 | 44 | 68 | 0.634 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| AG/GG | 162 | 55 | 66 | 1.17 (0.75-1.85) | 0.489 | 0.98 (0.63-1.53) | 0.939 | |
| GGc | 32 | 9 | 12 | 0.899 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| AA/AG | 282 | 90 | 122 | 1.13 (0.52-2.47) | 0.752 | 0.99 (0.46-2.12) | 0.969 | |
| CCc | 109 | 39 | 49 | 0.751 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 155 | 43 | 64 | 0.77 (0.47-1.27) | 0.310 | 0.83 (0.51-1.36) | 0.461 | |
| TT | 48 | 19 | 19 | 1.10 (0.58-2.10) | 0.770 | 0.85 (0.43-1.67) | 0.633 | |
| CCc | 109 | 39 | 49 | 0.771 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT/TT | 203 | 62 | 83 | 0.85 (0.53-1.35) | 0.492 | 0.84 (0.53-1.33) | 0.449 | |
| TTc | 48 | 19 | 19 | 0.629 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CC/CT | 264 | 82 | 113 | 0.79 (0.44-1.41) | 0.421 | 1.06 (0.57-1.96) | 0.853 | |
| CCc | 135 | 45 | 57 | 0.900 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 139 | 41 | 62 | 0.88 (0.54-1.44) | 0.617 | 0.96 (0.60-1.54) | 0.875 | |
| TT | 39 | 14 | 14 | 1.07 (0.53-1.26) | 0.842 | 0.75 (0.36-1.57) | 0.447 | |
| CCc | 135 | 45 | 57 | 0.937 | 1.00 | |||
| CT/TT | 178 | 55 | 76 | 0.93 (0.59-1.46) | 0.736 | 0.91 (0.58-1.43) | 0.695 | |
| TTc | 39 | 14 | 14 | 0.739 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CC/CT | 274 | 86 | 119 | 0.88 (0.45-1.69) | 0.692 | 1.30 (0.65-2.61) | 0.452 |
aAdjusted p values and adjusted odds ratios with their 95% CIs were examined using multiple and multinomial logistic regression models after controlling for age between patients with uterine cervical precancerous lesions and control women. bAdjusted p values and adjusted odds ratios with their 95% CIs were examined using multiple and multinomial logistic regression models after controlling for age between patients with uterine cervical invasive cancer and control women. cUsed as a reference for comparison to determine the odds ratios of other genotypes. AORs, adjusted odds ratios; 95% CIs, 95% confidence intervals; Ad. p, adjusted p.
Relationships of genotypic distribution of H19 rs2839698 and rs3741219 with clinicopathological characteristics of the patients with uterine cervical invasive cancer
| Characteristicsa | rs2839698 | ORs (95% CIs) | rs3741219 | ORs (95% CIs) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTb | CC/CT | GGb | AA/AG | ||||||
| 0.122 | 0.091 | ||||||||
| stage Ib | 2 | 73 | 1.00 | 3 | 72 | 1.00 | |||
| ≥ stage II | 5 | 47 | 0.26 (0.05-1.38) | 7 | 46 | 0.27 (0.07-1.11) | |||
| 0.634 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| squamous cell carcinomab | 6 | 99 | 1.00 | 9 | 97 | 1.00 | |||
| adenocarcinoma | 2 | 21 | 0.64 (0.12-3.37) | 2 | 21 | 0.97 (0.20-4.84) | |||
| 0.617 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| well (grade 1)b | 2 | 19 | 1.00 | 2 | 19 | 1.00 | |||
| moderate & poor (grades 2/3) | 6 | 101 | 1.77 (0.33-9.45) | 9 | 99 | 1.16 (0.23-5.79) | |||
| 0.724 | 0.591 | ||||||||
| ≤10 mmb | 3 | 55 | 1.00 | 6 | 53 | 1.00 | |||
| >10 mm | 5 | 62 | 0.68 (0.15-2.96) | 5 | 62 | 1.40 (0.41-4.86) | |||
| 0.142 | 0.014c | ||||||||
| ≤ 4cm | 2 | 67 | 1.00 | 2 | 67 | 1.00 | |||
| >4cm | 6 | 53 | 0.26 (0.05-1.36) | 9 | 51 | 0.17 (0.04-082) | |||
| 0.117 | 0.045c | ||||||||
| no invasionb | 3 | 80 | 1.00 | 4 | 79 | 1.00 | |||
| invasion | 5 | 37 | 0.28 (0.06-1.22) | 7 | 36 | 0.26 (0.07-0.95) | |||
| 0.117 | 0.041c | ||||||||
| no invasionb | 3 | 82 | 1.00 | 4 | 82 | 1.00 | |||
| invasion | 5 | 38 | 0.28 (0.06-1.22) | 7 | 36 | 0.25 (0.07-0.91) | |||
| 0.028c | 0.008c | ||||||||
| no metastasisb | 3 | 91 | 1.00 | 4 | 90 | 1.00 | |||
| metastasis | 5 | 28 | 0.19 (0.04-0.82) | 7 | 27 | 0.17 (0.05-0.63) | |||
Statistical analyses: chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, cp<0.05. aSome clinicopathological data could not be obtained from the patients with cervical invasive cancer due to incomplete medical charts or records. bAs a reference. ORs, odds ratios; 95% CIs, 95% confidence intervals.
Analysis for the associations of H19 genetic variants rs2839698 and rs3741219 as well as various clinicopatholgical characteristics with the recurrence-free survival and overall survival of the patients with uterine cervical cancer
| Recurrence-free survival | Overall survival | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | HR & 95% CIb | HR & 95% CIb | |||
| 0.932 | - | 0.961 | - | ||
| rs2839698 CC/CT vs. TTa | |||||
| rs3741219 AA/AG vs. GGa | 0.935 | - | 0.959 | - | |
| metastasis vs. no metastasisa | 0.033 | 2.81 (1.09-7.26) | 0.002 | 4.79 (1.81-12.66) | |
Statistical analyses: Cox proportional hazard model. aAs a comparison reference. bHR, hazard ratio and 95% CI, 95% confidence interval for H19 genetic variants rs2839698 and rs3741219 and clinicopathological variables, compared to their respective controls.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves for 5 year survival rate based on long non-coding RNA gene H19 polymorphisms and pelvic lymph node status. (A), rs2839698 CC/CT vs. TT, 5 year survival rate: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.89 vs. 0.80, 95% CI: 0.45-1.00; p=0.722); (B), rs3741219 AA/AG vs. GG, 5 year survival rate: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88 vs. 0.88, 95% CI: 0.65-1.00; p=0.429); (C), pelvic lymph node status, positive vs. negative, 5 year survival rate: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.72 vs. 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98; p<0.001). Log-rank test was applied to detect statistical significance. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.