Literature DB >> 27760813

Foot placement relies on state estimation during visually guided walking.

Rodrigo S Maeda1, Shawn M O'Connor2, J Maxwell Donelan1, Daniel S Marigold3,4.   

Abstract

As we walk, we must accurately place our feet to stabilize our motion and to navigate our environment. We must also achieve this accuracy despite imperfect sensory feedback and unexpected disturbances. In this study we tested whether the nervous system uses state estimation to beneficially combine sensory feedback with forward model predictions to compensate for these challenges. Specifically, subjects wore prism lenses during a visually guided walking task, and we used trial-by-trial variation in prism lenses to add uncertainty to visual feedback and induce a reweighting of this input. To expose altered weighting, we added a consistent prism shift that required subjects to adapt their estimate of the visuomotor mapping relationship between a perceived target location and the motor command necessary to step to that position. With added prism noise, subjects responded to the consistent prism shift with smaller initial foot placement error but took longer to adapt, compatible with our mathematical model of the walking task that leverages state estimation to compensate for noise. Much like when we perform voluntary and discrete movements with our arms, it appears our nervous systems uses state estimation during walking to accurately reach our foot to the ground. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Accurate foot placement is essential for safe walking. We used computational models and human walking experiments to test how our nervous system achieves this accuracy. We find that our control of foot placement beneficially combines sensory feedback with internal forward model predictions to accurately estimate the body's state. Our results match recent computational neuroscience findings for reaching movements, suggesting that state estimation is a general mechanism of human motor control.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; internal model; locomotion; uncertainty; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27760813      PMCID: PMC5288482          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00015.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  47 in total

1.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Scott H Frey; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion.

Authors:  Trevor Drew; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Understanding effector selectivity in human posterior parietal cortex by combining information patterns and activation measures.

Authors:  Frank T M Leoné; Tobias Heed; Ivan Toni; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  An evaluation of R2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: a Monte Carlo approach.

Authors:  Andrej-Nikolai Spiess; Natalie Neumeyer
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-07

9.  Neural control of locomotion; The central pattern generator from cats to humans.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 10.  Do human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination?

Authors:  Volker Dietz
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  18 in total

1.  The critical phase for visual control of human walking over complex terrain.

Authors:  Jonathan Samir Matthis; Sean L Barton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Challenging balance during sensorimotor adaptation increases generalization.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; J Maxwell Donelan; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The recovery response to a novel unannounced laboratory-induced slip: The "first trial effect" in older adults.

Authors:  Xuan Liu; Sasha Reschechtko; Shuaijie Wang; Yi-Chung Clive Pai
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Visual deprivation is met with active changes in ground reaction forces to minimize worsening balance and stability during walking.

Authors:  Otella Shoja; Alireza Farsi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Anatol G Feldman; Behrouz Abdoli; Alireza Bahramian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Altering attention to split-belt walking increases the generalization of motor memories across walking contexts.

Authors:  Dulce M Mariscal; Pablo A Iturralde; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Restricted vision increases sensorimotor cortex involvement in human walking.

Authors:  Anderson S Oliveira; Bryan R Schlink; W David Hairston; Peter König; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Use-dependent plasticity explains aftereffects in visually guided locomotor learning of a novel step length asymmetry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Wood; Hyosub E Kim; Margaret A French; Darcy S Reisman; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Motor cost affects the decision of when to shift gaze for guiding movement.

Authors:  F Javier Domínguez-Zamora; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Learning from the Physical Consequences of Our Actions Improves Motor Memory.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-01

10.  A leg to stand on: computational models of proprioception.

Authors:  Chris J Dallmann; Pierre Karashchuk; Bingni W Brunton; John C Tuthill
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2021-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.