Literature DB >> 24849346

Understanding effector selectivity in human posterior parietal cortex by combining information patterns and activation measures.

Frank T M Leoné1, Tobias Heed2, Ivan Toni3, W Pieter Medendorp3.   

Abstract

The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) has traditionally been viewed as containing separate regions for the planning of eye and limb movements, but recent neurophysiological and neuroimaging observations show that the degree of effector specificity is limited. This has led to the hypothesis that effector specificity in PPC is part of a more efficient than strictly modular organization, characterized by both distinct and common activations for different effectors. It is unclear, however, what differentiates the distinctions and commonalities in effector representations. Here, we used fMRI in humans to study the cortical representations involved in the planning of eye, hand, and foot movements. We used a novel combination of fMRI measures to assess the effector-related representational content of the PPC: a multivariate information measure, reflecting whether representations were distinct or common across effectors and a univariate activation measure, indicating which representations were actively involved in movement preparation. Active distinct representations were evident in areas previously reported to be effector specific: eye specificity in the posterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS), hand tuning in anterior IPS, and a foot bias in the anterior precuneus. Crucially, PPC regions responding to a particular effector also contained an active representation common across the other two effectors. We infer that rostral PPC areas do not code single effectors, but rather dichotomies of effectors. Such combinations of representations could be well suited for active effector selection, efficiently coding both a selected effector and its alternatives.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/347102-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; effector selectivity; fMRI; foot; parietal cortex; pointing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24849346      PMCID: PMC6608188          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5242-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  25 in total

Review 1.  The mirror illusion's effects on body state estimation.

Authors:  Tamer M Soliman; Laurel J Buxbaum; Steven A Jax
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Morphological patterns of the intraparietal sulcus and the anterior intermediate parietal sulcus of Jensen in the human brain.

Authors:  Veronika Zlatkina; Michael Petrides
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Egomotion-related visual areas respond to active leg movements.

Authors:  Chiara Serra; Claudio Galletti; Sara Di Marco; Patrizia Fattori; Gaspare Galati; Valentina Sulpizio; Sabrina Pitzalis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Foot placement relies on state estimation during visually guided walking.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Maeda; Shawn M O'Connor; J Maxwell Donelan; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Brain network profiling defines functionally specialized cortical networks.

Authors:  Simone Di Plinio; Sjoerd J H Ebisch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Gaurav Panthi; Rechu Divakar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Planning Ahead: Object-Directed Sequential Actions Decoded from Human Frontoparietal and Occipitotemporal Networks.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Ingrid S Johnsrude; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Egomotion-related visual areas respond to goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Martina Bellagamba; Valentina Sulpizio; Patrizia Fattori; Gaspare Galati; Claudio Galletti; Teresa Maltempo; Sabrina Pitzalis
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 9.  Decision-making in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Decoding Internally and Externally Driven Movement Plans.

Authors:  Giacomo Ariani; Moritz F Wurm; Angelika Lingnau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.