Le Zhang1,2, Alex Burant3,2, Andrew McCallister3,2, Victor Zhao3, Karl M Koshlap4, Simone Degan5, Michael Antonacci3,2, Rosa Tamara Branca3,2. 1. Department of Applied Physical Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 4. Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 5. Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Dermatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the temperature dependence of the resonance frequency of lipid-dissolved xenon (LDX) and to assess the accuracy of LDX-based MR thermometry. METHODS: The chemical shift temperature dependence of water protons, methylene protons, and LDX was measured from samples containing tissues with varying fat contents using a high-resolution NMR spectrometer. LDX results were then used to acquire relative and absolute temperature maps in vivo and the results were compared with PRF-based MR thermometry. RESULTS: The temperature dependence of proton resonance frequency (PRF) is strongly affected by the specific distribution of water and fat. A redistribution of water and fat compartments can reduce the apparent temperature dependence of the water chemical shift from -0.01 ppm/°C to -0.006 ppm, whereas the LDX chemical shift shows a consistent temperature dependence of -0.21 ppm/°C. The use of the methylene protons resonance frequency as internal reference improves the accuracy of LDX-based MR thermometry, but degrades that of PRF-based MR thermometry, as microscopic susceptibility gradients affected lipid and water spins differently. CONCLUSION: The LDX resonance frequency, with its higher temperature dependence, provides more accurate and precise temperature measurements, both in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, the resonance frequency of nearby methylene protons can be used to extract absolute temperature information. Magn Reson Med 78:1070-1079, 2017.
PURPOSE: To investigate the temperature dependence of the resonance frequency of lipid-dissolved xenon (LDX) and to assess the accuracy of LDX-based MR thermometry. METHODS: The chemical shift temperature dependence of water protons, methylene protons, and LDX was measured from samples containing tissues with varying fat contents using a high-resolution NMR spectrometer. LDX results were then used to acquire relative and absolute temperature maps in vivo and the results were compared with PRF-based MR thermometry. RESULTS: The temperature dependence of proton resonance frequency (PRF) is strongly affected by the specific distribution of water and fat. A redistribution of water and fat compartments can reduce the apparent temperature dependence of the water chemical shift from -0.01 ppm/°C to -0.006 ppm, whereas the LDX chemical shift shows a consistent temperature dependence of -0.21 ppm/°C. The use of the methylene protons resonance frequency as internal reference improves the accuracy of LDX-based MR thermometry, but degrades that of PRF-based MR thermometry, as microscopic susceptibility gradients affected lipid and water spins differently. CONCLUSION: The LDX resonance frequency, with its higher temperature dependence, provides more accurate and precise temperature measurements, both in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, the resonance frequency of nearby methylene protons can be used to extract absolute temperature information. Magn Reson Med 78:1070-1079, 2017.
Authors: Paul Baron; Roel Deckers; Martijn de Greef; Laura G Merckel; Chris J G Bakker; Job G Bouwman; Ronald L A W Bleys; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Lambertus W Bartels Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sara M Sprinkhuizen; Chris J G Bakker; Johannes H Ippel; Rolf Boelens; Max A Viergever; Lambertus W Bartels Journal: MAGMA Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Paul Baron; Roel Deckers; Job G Bouwman; Chris J G Bakker; Martijn de Greef; Max A Viergever; Chrit T W Moonen; Lambertus W Bartels Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Rosa Tamara Branca; Ting He; Le Zhang; Carlos S Floyd; Matthew Freeman; Christian White; Alex Burant Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kong Y Chen; Robert J Brychta; Zahraa Abdul Sater; Thomas M Cassimatis; Cheryl Cero; Laura A Fletcher; Nikita S Israni; James W Johnson; Hannah J Lea; Joyce D Linderman; Alana E O'Mara; Kenneth Y Zhu; Aaron M Cypess Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Michael A Antonacci; Christian McHugh; Michele Kelley; Andrew McCallister; Simone Degan; Rosa T Branca Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Andrew McCallister; Sang Hun Chung; Michael Antonacci; Margret Z Powell; Agathe S Ceppe; Scott H Donaldson; Yueh Z Lee; Rosa Tamara Branca; Jennifer L Goralski Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-08-08 Impact factor: 4.668