Literature DB >> 27757437

Point of view: posterior cervical lamino-foraminotomy-safe, viable and cost effective non-fusion technique.

Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan1, Sakthivel Rajan Rajaram Manoharan2.   

Abstract

Year:  2016        PMID： 27757437      PMCID： PMC5067268          DOI： 10.21037/jss.2016.08.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN： 2414-4630


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases.

Authors:  Mohamad Bydon; Dimitrios Mathios; Mohamed Macki; Rafael de la Garza-Ramos; Daniel M Sciubba; Timothy F Witham; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-08-15

2.  Long-lasting cervical radicular pain managed with surgery, physiotherapy, or a cervical collar. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  L C Persson; C A Carlsson; J Y Carlsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy in the military: the cost effectiveness of posterior cervical foraminotomy compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Luis M Tumialán; Ryan P Ponton; Wayne M Gluf
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Cervical foraminotomy: an effective treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

Authors:  G R Kumar; R S Maurice-Williams; R Bradford
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990.

Authors:  K Radhakrishnan; W J Litchy; W M O'Fallon; L T Kurland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chunpeng Ren; Yueming Song; Youdi Xue; Xi Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rick B Delamarter; Jack Zigler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without instrumentation.

Authors:  Ian P Wright; Stephen M Eisenstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yan Hu; Guohua Lv; Siying Ren; Daniel Johansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Tandem keyhole foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: retrospective review of 35 cases.

Authors:  Hidetomi Terai; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Hiroyuki Yasuda; Kunikazu Kaneda; Hirofumi Katsutani; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.359
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.