Literature DB >> 17414911

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without instrumentation.

Ian P Wright1, Stephen M Eisenstein.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review of clinical file information and postoperative imaging, collected prospectively over a period of 14 years, in anticipation of study.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Assessment of technical success in achieving anterior cervical fusion without internal fixation; 2) assessment of postoperative neck pain relevant to technical success or failure of fusion; and 3) assessment of morbidity arising from iliac crest bone graft donor site. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: After anterior cervical discectomy and bone grafting for cervical radiculopathy or the intractable pain of cervical spondylosis, common clinical practice varies widely between the extremes of internal fixation in all cases, and never applying fixation. The clinical information and relevant imaging of 97 consecutive patients, 46 male, was reviewed at 12 months after surgery.
METHODS: All surgery was performed at no more than 2 contiguous levels, by one surgeon (S.M.E.). After anterior discectomy alone, or combined with posterior vertebral body margin osteophytectomy, anterior bone grafting (Smith-Robinson) was performed at each level using a tricortical autogenous iliac crest bone block inserted under compression. In the interests of maximizing resource allocation and minimizing potential complications, all surgery was completed without internal fixation. A postoperative semirigid cervical collar was prescribed for 2 months.
RESULTS: In 54 patients having 1-level fusion, there were 6 pseudarthroses (11%). In 43 patients having 2-level fusion, 12 patients demonstrated pseudarthroses (28% of patients) at a total of 18 levels (21% of levels). Only 2 of the 97 patients had pain related to the donor site.
CONCLUSIONS: These results tend to confirm published reports of high pseudarthrosis rates in anterior cervical fusions carried out at 2 or more levels without fixation, as against improved fusion rates when internal fixation is applied. The authors are inclined to change their practice to include internal fixation in the form of anterior plating for fusions carried out at more than one level. Patients with technically successful fusions were less likely to have postoperative neck pain. Donor site pain was not a significant postoperative complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414911     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000258846.86537.ad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

1.  A new source of structural autograft for ACDF surgery: cervical laminae.

Authors:  Jiaming Liu; Xu Xiong; Xinhua Long; Yong Shu; Shanhu Huang; Dong Yang; Zhili Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

2.  Higher reoperation rate following cervical disc replacement in a retrospective, long-term comparative study of 715 patients.

Authors:  Martin Skeppholm; Thomas Henriques; Tycho Tullberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Point of view: posterior cervical lamino-foraminotomy-safe, viable and cost effective non-fusion technique.

Authors:  Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Sakthivel Rajan Rajaram Manoharan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

4.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical Implant Allergy With Chronic Neck Pain: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ryoma Aoyama; Ukei Anazawa; Hiraku Hotta; Itsuo Watanabe; Yuichiro Takahashi; Shogo Matsumoto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-23

6.  Risk Factors for Nonroutine Discharge in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion for Intervertebral Disc Disorders.

Authors:  Matthew J Best; Leonard T Buller; Jonathan Falakassa; David Vecchione
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 7.  Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Anthony M T Chau; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; Todd H Lanman; J Kenneth Burkus; Scott D Hodges; Jeffrey R McConnell; Randall F Dryer; Francine W Schranck; Anne G Copay
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

9.  Deuk Laser Disc Repair(®) is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Ara J Deukmedjian; S T Jason Cutright; Pa-C Augusto Cianciabella; Arias Deukmedjian
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-05-28

10.  Iliac crest autograft versus alternative constructs for anterior cervical spine surgery: Pros, cons, and costs.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.