Literature DB >> 10070468

Cervical foraminotomy: an effective treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

G R Kumar1, R S Maurice-Williams, R Bradford.   

Abstract

Between 1983 and 1994, posterior cervical foraminotomy as described by Frykholm was performed on 89 patients with exclusively radicular symptoms caused by cervical osteophytes. The main presenting feature was arm pain. Objective neurological signs were present in 50% of the patients. At mean postoperative follow-up of 8.6 months, 95.5% of patients reported excellent or good results, while 4.5% were not improved. No patient was rendered worse following the procedure. There were no deaths and the complication rate was 2.2%. Further surgery for recurrent root symptoms was required by 6.7% of patients. Our findings are in keeping with the good results and low complication rate of this procedure as described in other studies. Informal inquiries suggest that this procedure is not widely used, at any rate in the United Kingdom, and we present this series in order to emphasize the efficacy and safety of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10070468     DOI: 10.1080/02688699844448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  11 in total

1.  Details of fibroligamentous structures in the cervical unco-vertebral region: an obscure corner.

Authors:  S Yilmazlar; I Ikiz; H Kocaeli; I Tekdemir; S B Adim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Anatomical study of the cervical nerve roots for posterior foraminotomy: cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mohamed Barakat; Youssef Hussein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Point of view: posterior cervical lamino-foraminotomy-safe, viable and cost effective non-fusion technique.

Authors:  Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Sakthivel Rajan Rajaram Manoharan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

4.  Long term effect on adjacent segment motion after posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Tack Geun Cho; Young Baeg Kim; Seung Won Park
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-03-31

5.  Operative outcomes for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  J G Galbraith; J S Butler; A M Dolan; J M O'Byrne
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-10-20

6.  Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Byron C Branch; Donald L Hilton; Clark Watts
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-19

7.  Minimally Invasive versus Open Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Clark; Kalil G Abdullah; Michael P Steinmetz; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2011-12

8.  Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC).

Authors:  Anja Tschugg; Sabrina Neururer; Kai Michael Scheufler; Hanno Ulmer; Claudius Thomé; Aldemar Andres Hegewald
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Cervical spinal epidural hematoma following cervical posterior laminoforaminotomy.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 10.  Operative outcomes for cervical degenerative disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kazuya Nishizawa; Kanji Mori; Yasuo Saruhashi; Yoshitaka Matsusue
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2012-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.