Literature DB >> 25127430

Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases.

Mohamad Bydon1, Dimitrios Mathios, Mohamed Macki, Rafael de la Garza-Ramos, Daniel M Sciubba, Timothy F Witham, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ziya L Gokaslan, Ali Bydon.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors conducted a study to investigate the rate and timing of reoperation due to symptom recurrence after unilateral posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF).
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed demographic, surgical, and clinical data from 151 patients who underwent unilateral PCF at their institution with an average follow-up of 4.15 years. The main outcome variables were reoperation rate, time to reoperation, and short- and long-term radiculopathy improvement rates. Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to assess risk of reoperation and recurrence of radiculopathy over time.
RESULTS: After index PCF in 151 patients, the overall reoperation rate was 9.9% (15 patients). The average time until reoperation was 2.4 years, and the average last follow-up examination was 4.15 years after the first surgery. Patients who presented with preoperative neck pain in addition to radiculopathy had a higher risk for reoperation and a shorter time to reoperation. The majority of patients who underwent a reoperation had an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (80%). A smaller number of patients had reoperation that included a repeat PCF (6.7%) or laminectomy with posterior cervical fusion (13.3%). The rate of same-level reoperation (6.6%, 10 patients) was significantly higher (p = 0.05) when compared with adjacent-segment (1.3%, 2 patients) or distant-segment (1.9%, 3 patients) reoperation. At last follow-up, the overall rate of improvement in radiculopathy was 85%, with the majority of patients (91.4%) experiencing resolution as early as 1 month after index surgery. Following the subgroup that experienced initial symptom improvement, 16.1% of these patients experienced radiculopathy recurrence an average of 7.3 years after the initial operation. While the reoperation rate for the overall cohort in this series was 9.9%, patients with follow-up periods longer than 2 years had a reoperation rate of 18.3%. Moreover, patients with more than 10 years of follow-up had a reoperation rate of 24.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: PCF is a procedure performed to address nerve root compression in the cervical spine. The authors evaluated 151 patients who underwent unilateral PCF and found a reoperation rate of 9.9% at an average of 2.4 years after the initial surgery (6.6% at same level, 3.3% elsewhere). The reoperation rates reached 18.3% and 24.3% in patients with follow-up periods longer than 2 and 10 years, respectively. The authors' analysis revealed that patients with no preoperative neck pain had the lowest rates of revision surgery after PCF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; PCF = posterior cervical foraminotomy; cervical; degenerative; facetectomy; foraminotomy; laminectomy; posterior; reoperation; spine

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25127430     DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE131110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  16 in total

1.  Point of view: posterior cervical lamino-foraminotomy-safe, viable and cost effective non-fusion technique.

Authors:  Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Sakthivel Rajan Rajaram Manoharan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

2.  Minimally invasive cervical foraminotomy and diskectomy for laterally located soft disk herniation.

Authors:  Chi Heon Kim; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Sung Bae Park; Seung Heon Yang; Sung Mi Kim; Joo-Kyung Sung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls.

Authors:  Dante Leven; Joshua Meaike; Kris Radcliff; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Myung Soo Youn; Myeong Hwan Shon; Yoon Jae Seong; Jong Ki Shin; Tae Sik Goh; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zou; Ping-Chuan Wang; Hao Chen; Xin-Min Feng; Hui-Hui Sun
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

7.  The role of iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from lordotic correction in the development of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Michael A Gallizzi; Charles Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Lindsay T Kleeman; Adam M Caputo; Megan Eure; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Junming Cao; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Venu M Nemani; Chaiwat Piyaskulkaew; Samuel Romero Vargas; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15

10.  Cervical disc hernia operations through posterior laminoforaminotomy.

Authors:  Coskun Yolas; Nuriye Guzin Ozdemir; Hilmi Onder Okay; Ayhan Kanat; Mehmet Senol; Ibrahim Burak Atci; Hakan Yilmaz; Mustafa Kemal Coban; Mehmet Onur Yuksel; Umit Kahraman
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.