| Literature DB >> 27756898 |
Petra Edlund1, Heikki Takala1,2,3, Elin Claesson1, Léocadie Henry1, Robert Dods1, Heli Lehtivuori4, Matthijs Panman1, Kanupriya Pande5, Thomas White5, Takanori Nakane6, Oskar Berntsson1, Emil Gustavsson1, Petra Båth1, Vaibhav Modi7, Shatabdi Roy-Chowdhury8, James Zook8, Peter Berntsen9, Suraj Pandey10, Ishwor Poudyal10, Jason Tenboer10, Christopher Kupitz10, Anton Barty5, Petra Fromme8, Jake D Koralek11, Tomoyuki Tanaka12, John Spence13,14,15, Mengning Liang11, Mark S Hunter11, Sebastien Boutet11, Eriko Nango12, Keith Moffat16,17, Gerrit Groenhof7, Janne Ihalainen18, Emina A Stojković19, Marius Schmidt10, Sebastian Westenhoff1.
Abstract
Phytochromes are a family of photoreceptors that control light responses of plants, fungi and bacteria. A sequence of structural changes, which is not yet fully understood, leads to activation of an output domain. Time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) can potentially shine light on these conformational changes. Here we report the room temperature crystal structure of the chromophore-binding domains of the Deinococcus radiodurans phytochrome at 2.1 Å resolution. The structure was obtained by serial femtosecond X-ray crystallography from microcrystals at an X-ray free electron laser. We find overall good agreement compared to a crystal structure at 1.35 Å resolution derived from conventional crystallography at cryogenic temperatures, which we also report here. The thioether linkage between chromophore and protein is subject to positional ambiguity at the synchrotron, but is fully resolved with SFX. The study paves the way for time-resolved structural investigations of the phytochrome photocycle with time-resolved SFX.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27756898 PMCID: PMC5069500 DOI: 10.1038/srep35279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Comparison of the crystal structures for the PAS-GAF fragment from bacteriophytochrome from D. radiodurans at cryogenic (LowT) and room (SFX) temperatures.
The datasets are truncated at 2.1 Å resolution in all panels. (a) Superimposed SFX (green) and LowT (grey) structures plotted together with the Fo(SFX)-Fo(LowT) difference map (red: negative, green: positive) at 3.8 σ. The overall R-factor for difference map is 24.5%. (b) The same representation zoomed into the chromophore region. The Fo(SFX)-Fo(LowT) difference map is contoured at 3.0 σ. (c) The LowT structure and the corresponding maps (2Fo-Fc, blue at 1.3 σ and Fo-Fc difference map at 3.3 σ). The extra water only present in the LowT structure is indicated by a red arrow. (d) The SFX structure and the corresponding maps (2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc maps, contour levels as in c).
Figure 2Microcrystallisation of PAS-GAF.
(a) Micrograph of microcrystals produced by direct crystallisation in microcentrifuge tubes, and (b) the microcrystals produced by crushing macrocrystals (inset) with seed beads. (c) Absorption spectra of PAS-GAF in solution (black) and microcrystals (blue). (d) Structure and atom names of the bilverdin cofactor.
Figure 3Comparison of LowT and SFX structures to earlier published PAS-GAF structures.
(a) Comparison of the biliverdin conformation and cystein24 thioether linkage of LowT and SFX structures with previously reported PAS-GAF structures 4IJG21, 4Q0H9, and the PAS-GAF-PHY structure 4Q0J9. 4Q0H has very similar conformation around the thioether bond compared to 2O9C and 2O9B8, which are not displayed for clarity. (b) Comparison of the SFX structure and 4Q0H9 PAS-GAF-structures reveals differences in the D- and A-ring orientation, the thioether linkage and the positions of Tyr263, Met267, Tyr173 and the residues 17–25 and 184–186. The grey water (marked by red arrow) is only observable in the LowT structure (see text for details).
Figure 4Structural overlay of the SFX (green) and SACLA (sand) structures plotted together with the Fo(SFX)-Fo(LowT) difference map (red: negative, green: positive) at 3.8 σ.
(a) data truncated at 2.2 Å (overall R-factor 14.6%) and (b) data truncated at 2.5 Å (overall R-factor 11.6%).
Figure 5The omit maps of the chromophore (blue) contoured at a 1.5 σ.
(a) The LowT structure in grey (b). The SFX structure in green. (c) SACLA in sand.
Data Collection and Refinement Statistics.
| LOWT PAS-GAF, ESRF | SFX PAS-GAF, LCLS | SACLA PAS-GAF, SACLA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDB Code | 5K5B | 5L8M | 5LBR |
| Data Collection | |||
| Collection Temperature | 100 K | 293 K | 293 K |
| Space group | C121 | C121 | C121 |
| Cell dimensions | |||
| a, b, c (Å) | 93.76, 54.28, 70.15 | 94.10, 54.80, 69.90 | 96.22 55.49 71.63 |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90.00, 92.20, 90.00 | 90.00, 92.60, 90.00 | 90.00 92.84 90.00 |
| Resolution (Å) | 46.97–1.35 (1.38–1.35) | 38.20–2.10 (2.15–2.10) | 71.55–2.20 (2.28–2.20) |
| Rmerge (%) | 3.60 (56.0) | — | — |
| Rsplit (%) | N/A | 9.19 (85.43) | 11.9 (67.7) |
| I/σI | 18.37 (2.31) | 7.77 (1.80) | 5.62 (0.68) |
| CC(1/2) | 99.9 (76.5) | 98.0 (49) | 97.6 (60.4) |
| Completeness (%) | 98.07 (95.69) | 99.97 (99.8) | 100 (100) |
| Redundancy | 4.36 (4.23) | 819 (526) | 81.2 (24.1) |
| Number of hits | N/A | 114409 | 30146 |
| Number of indexed hits | N/A | 90428 | 20014 |
| Refinement | |||
| Resolution (Å) | 39.37–1.35 (1.39–1.35) | 38.20–2.10 (2.15–2.10) | 71.55–2.20 (2.26–2.20) |
| Number of reflections | 72086 (5211) | 18732 (1202) | 18389 (1326) |
| Rwork/Rfree | 0.141/0.171 (0.260/0.288) | 0.176/0.218 (0.299/0.297) | 0.182/0.203 (0.496/0.483) |
| Number of atoms | 2720 | 2505 | 2492 |
| Average B factor (Å2) | 25.47 | 42.92 | 50.26 |
| R.m.s. deviations | |||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.010 | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Bond angles (°) | 1.506 | 1.313 | 1.287 |
†Highest resolution shell is shown in parenthesis.