Literature DB >> 27172819

Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?

Joel Wells1, Michael Millis2, Young-Jo Kim2, Evgeny Bulat2, Patricia Miller2, Travis Matheney2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) continues to be a commonly performed nonarthroplasty option to treat symptomatic developmental hip dysplasia, but there are few long-term followup studies evaluating results after PAO. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the long-term survivorship of the hip after PAO? (2) What were the validated outcomes scores among patients who had PAO more than 14 years ago? (3) What factors are associated with long-term failure?
METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight dysplastic hips (133 patients) underwent PAO between May 1991 and September 1998 by a single surgeon. Of those, 37 hips (34 patients [26%]) were lost to followup; an additional seven patients (5% [eight hips]) had not been seen in the last 5 years. The 121 hips (in 99 patients) were retrospectively evaluated at a mean of 18 years (range, 14-22 years). Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the endpoint. Hips were evaluated for activity, pain, and general health using the UCLA Activity Score, modified Harris hip score, WOMAC, and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Failure was defined as a WOMAC pain subscale score ≥ 10 or having undergone THA. Hips were divided into three groups: asymptomatic (did not meet any failure criteria at any point in time), symptomatic (met WOMAC pain failure criteria at previous or most recent followup), and replaced (having undergone THA). A multinomial logistic regression model using a general estimating equations approach was used to assess factors associated with failure.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis with THA as the endpoint revealed a survival rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 74% (66%-83%) at 18 years. Twenty-six hips (21%) underwent THA at an average of 9 ± 5 years from the surgery. Sixty-four hips (53%) remained asymptomatic and did not meet any failure criteria at most recent followup. Thirty-one hips (26%) were symptomatic and considered failed based on a WOMAC pain score of ≥ 10 with a mean ± SD of 11 ± 4 out of 20 at most recent followup. Although some failed initially by pain, their most recent WOMAC score may have been < 10. Of the 16 symptomatic hips that failed early by pain (reported a WOMAC pain subscale score ≥ 10 in the prior study), two were lost to followup, two underwent THA at 16 and 17 years, four still failed because of pain at most recent followup, and the remaining eight had WOMAC pain scores < 10 at most recent followup. Asymptomatic hips reported better UCLA Activity Scores (asymptomatic: mean ± SD, 7 ± 2; symptomatic: 6 ± 2, p = 0.001), modified Harris hip scores (pain, function, and activity sections; asymptomatic: 80 ± 11; symptomatic: 50 ± 15, p < 0.001), WOMAC (asymptomatic: 2 ± 2, symptomatic: 11 ± 4, p < 0.001), and HOOS (asymptomatic: 87 ± 11, symptomatic: 52 ± 20, p < 0.001) compared with symptomatic hips at long-term followup. Age older than 25 years at the time of PAO (symptomatic: odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3-9.8; p = 0.01; replaced: OR, 8.9; 95% CI, 2.6-30.9; p < 0.001) and a preoperative joint space width ≤ 2 mm (replaced: OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.12-0.71; p = 0.007) or ≥ 5 mm (replaced: OR, 0.121; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56; p = 0.007) were associated with long-term failure while controlling for poor or fair preoperative joint congruency.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the durability of the Bernese PAO at long-term followup. In a subset of patients, there was progression to failure over time. Factors of progression to THA or more severe symptoms include age older than 25 years, poor or fair preoperative hip congruency, and a preoperative joint space width that is less than 2 mm or more than 5 mm. Future studies should focus on evaluating the two failure groups that we have identified in our study: those that failed early and went on to THA and those that are symptomatic at long-term followup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27172819      PMCID: PMC5213921          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4887-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  43 in total

1.  Periacetabular osteotomy without abductor dissection using direct anterior exposure.

Authors:  S B Murphy; M B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  C B Terwee; W Bouwmeester; S L van Elsland; H C W de Vet; J Dekker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery.

Authors:  Joanne L Kemp; Natalie J Collins; Ewa M Roos; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: outcomes at a minimum of twenty-two years.

Authors:  George Georgiades; George C Babis; George Hartofilakidis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Identification of cut-points in commonly used hip osteoarthritis-related outcome measures that define the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS).

Authors:  Alicia J Emerson Kavchak; Chad Cook; Eric J Hegedus; Alexis A Wright
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome.

Authors:  S B Murphy; R Ganz; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger.

Authors:  James P McAuley; Edward S Szuszczewicz; Anthony Young; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Radiographic and patient factors associated with pre-radiographic osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Rebecca H Jessel; David Zurakowski; Christoph Zilkens; Deborah Burstein; Martha L Gray; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Intermediate to long-term results following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Travis Matheney; Young-Jo Kim; David Zurakowski; Catherine Matero; Michael Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  34 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: A Possible New Radiographic Predictor of Progression of Osteoarthritis in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: The Center Gap.

Authors:  Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are Complications After the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy Associated With Subsequent Outcomes Scores?

Authors:  Joel Wells; Perry Schoenecker; Jeff Petrie; Kayla Thomason; Charles W Goss; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Periacetabular osteotomy-what influence does age have on patient-relevant results? : A prospective 5‑year investigation].

Authors:  L Franken; F Thielemann; A Postler; S Blum; A Hartmann; K-P Günther; J Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Daud Tai Shan Chou; Lucian Bogdan Solomon; Kerry Costi; Susan Pannach; Oksana Tamara Holubowycz; Donald William Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.

Authors:  Till Dominic Lerch; Simon Damian Steppacher; Emanuel Francis Liechti; Moritz Tannast; Klaus Arno Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Automatic MRI-based Three-dimensional Models of Hip Cartilage Provide Improved Morphologic and Biochemical Analysis.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Ronja Helfenstein; Guodong Zeng; Till D Lerch; Eduardo N Novais; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.

Authors:  Joel Wells; Jeffrey J Nepple; Karla Crook; James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Perry Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Long-term results of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy using a dual approach in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Hyun Chul Shon; Woo Sung Park; Jae-Suk Chang; Seong-Eun Byun; Dong-Wook Son; Hee Jin Park; Sang Hoon Ha; Ki Tae Park; Jai Hyung Park
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Hip dysplasia in the young adult caused by residual childhood and adolescent-onset dysplasia.

Authors:  Stephanie Pun
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.