Literature DB >> 9699842

The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

N Sugano1, P C Noble, E Kamaric, J K Salama, T Ochi, H S Tullos.   

Abstract

We studied the morphometry of 35 femora from 31 female patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and another 15 from 15 age- and sex-matched control patients using CT and three-dimensional computer reconstruction models. According to the classification of Crowe et al 15 of the dysplastic hips were graded as class I (less than 50% subluxation), ten as class I/III (50% to 100% subluxation) and ten as class IV (more than 100% subluxation). The femora with DDH had 10 to 14 degrees more anteversion than the control group independent of the degree of subluxation of the hip. In even the most mildly dysplastic joints, the femur had a smaller and more anteverted canal than the normal control. With increased subluxation, additional abnormalities were observed in the size and position of the femoral head. Femora from dislocated joints had a short, anteverted neck associated with a smaller, narrower, and straighter canal than femora of classes I and II/III or the normal control group. We suggest that when total hip replacement is performed in the patient with DDH, the femoral prosthesis should be chosen on the basis of the severity of the subluxation and the degree of anteversion of each individual femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9699842     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b4.8319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  79 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA.

Authors:  Akinobu Matsushita; Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanori Fujii; Taishi Sato; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Prospective analyses of female urinary incontinence symptoms following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keiko Okumura; Kumiko Yamaguchi; Tatsuya Tamaki; Kazuhiro Oinuma; Hikaru Tomoe; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia.

Authors:  G Papachristou; P Hatzigrigoris; K Panousis; S Plessas; J Sourlas; C Levidiotis; E Chronopoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Articular surface remodeling of the hip after periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Brian J Rasquinha; Junaid Sayani; John F Rudan; Gavin C A Wood; Randy E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Periacetabular osteotomy restores the typically excessive range of motion in dysplastic hips with a spherical head.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Corinne A Zurmühle; Marc Puls; Klaus A Siebenrock; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The effect of femoral neck osteotomy on femoral component position of a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Is there a distinct pattern to the acetabular labrum and articular cartilage damage in the non-dysplastic hip with instability?

Authors:  Kotaro R Shibata; Shuichi Matsuda; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.

Authors:  Joel Wells; Jeffrey J Nepple; Karla Crook; James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Perry Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.

Authors:  S D Steppacher; M Tannast; S Werlen; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.