Literature DB >> 30048144

Does 3DMR provide equivalent information as 3DCT for the pre-operative evaluation of adult Hip pain conditions of femoroacetabular impingement and Hip dysplasia?

Kevin Yan1, Yin Xi1, Chayanit Sasiponganan1, Joseph Zerr1, Joel E Wells2, Avneesh Chhabra1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia (HD) are frequently evaluated by isotropic CT (3DCT) for preoperative planning at the expense of radiation. The aim was to determine if isotropic MRI (3DMR) imaging can provide similar quantitative and qualitative morphological information as 3DCT.
METHODS: : 25 consecutive patients with a final diagnosis of FAI or HD were retrospectively selected from December 2016-December 2017. Two readers (R1, R2) performed quantitative angular measurements on 3DCT and 3DMR, blinded to the diagnosis and each other's measurements. 3DMR and 3DCT of the hips were qualitatively and independently evaluated by a radiologist (R3), surgeon (R4), and fellow (R5). Interobserver and intermodality comparisons were performed.
RESULTS: : The ICC was good to excellent for all measurements between R1 and R2 (ICC:0.60-0.98) and the majority of intermodality measurements for R1 and R2. Average inter-reader and inter-modality PABAK showed good to excellent agreement for qualitative reads. On CT, all alpha angles (AA) were significantly lower in dysplasia patients than in cam patients (p < 0.05). All lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) were significantly lower in dysplasia than in cam patients (p < 0.05). On MR, AA at 12, 1, and 2 o'clock, and LCEA at center were significantly lower in dysplasia patients than in cam patients (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: : 3DMR offers similar qualitative and quantitative analysis as 3DCT in adult painful hip conditions. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: 3DMR has good potential to replace 3DCT and serve as a one-stop modality for bone and soft tissue characterizations in the pre-operative evaluation of FAI and HD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30048144      PMCID: PMC6319831          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  30 in total

1.  The anterior centre-edge angle. A cadaver study.

Authors:  J R Crockarell; R T Trousdale; J L Guyton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-05

Review 2.  Relationship of acetabular dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement to hip osteoarthritis: a focused review.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Nathaniel K Royer
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Quantification of the accuracy of MRI generated 3D models of long bones compared to CT generated 3D models.

Authors:  Kanchana Rathnayaka; Konstantin I Momot; Hansrudi Noser; Andrew Volp; Michael A Schuetz; Tony Sahama; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 4.  Femoral acetabular impingement.

Authors:  Daniel Hendry; Eric England; Keith Kenter; Robert D Wissman
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 5.  Femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Simon Dimmick; Kathryn J Stevens; David Brazier; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Bone and joint modeling from 3D knee MRI: feasibility and comparison with radiographs and 2D MRI.

Authors:  Vibhor Wadhwa; Vidur Malhotra; Yin Xi; Shaun Nordeck; Katherine Coyner; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  3-D Isotropic MR Imaging for Planning Bone Reconstruction in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Shaun Nordeck; Jennifer Flanagan; Lulu Tenorio; William Robertson; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

8.  Automatic hip cartilage segmentation from 3D MR images using arc-weighted graph searching.

Authors:  Ying Xia; Shekhar S Chandra; Craig Engstrom; Mark W Strudwick; Stuart Crozier; Jurgen Fripp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.

Authors:  Joel Wells; Jeffrey J Nepple; Karla Crook; James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Perry Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular dysplasia in the adult.

Authors:  D R Cooperman; R Wallensten; S D Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  MRI-based static and functional assessment of complex hip deformities in comparison with CT: a validation study.

Authors:  Sophia Blum; Lea Franken; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Verena Plodeck; Dirk Danowski; Jens-Peter Kühn; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jens Goronzy
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review.

Authors:  Mateusz C Florkow; Koen Willemsen; Vasco V Mascarenhas; Edwin H G Oei; Marijn van Stralen; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.119

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.