Literature DB >> 27746996

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: which is the learning curve of an experienced consultant?

Antonio Mazzella1, Anne Olland2, Pierre Emmanuel Falcoz1, Stephane Renaud3, Nicola Santelmo1, Gilbert Massard3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the number of video-assisted thoracic surgery-lobectomies (VATS-lobectomies) required for an experienced consultant thoracic surgeon to obtain competence and to perform standard quality surgery.
METHODS: We have analysed the initial VATS-experience (January 2012 to September 2014) of a confirmed senior consultant who has performed 145 consecutive anatomic resections by thoracoscopy. After excluding bilobectomies, segmentectomies, and lobectomies for infectious disease, we have focused into 119 consecutive lobectomies, classified into 4 chronologic groups of 30 each. We have considered: demographics; pathology; postoperative outcomes; conversion rate; morbidity. We compared the 4 groups in a Bayesian inference model (very strong probability of a difference if Pr>95% or <5%; strong probability if 95%>Pr>80% or 5%<Pr<20%).
RESULTS: There was a very strong probability of difference of group 1 (first 30 lobectomies) compared to the 3 other groups: less incomplete fissures (Pr1<2=0.019, Pr1<3=0.037, Pr1<4=0.046), more node samplings (Pr1>2=0.977, Pr1>3=0.96, Pr1>4=0.997) and, conversely, less radical dissections (Pr1<2=0.022, Pr1<3=0.039, Pr1<4=0.003), less harvested nodes (Pr1<2≤0.001, Pr1<3≤0.001, Pr1<4≤0.001), less pleural adhesions (Pr1<2=0.077, Pr1<3=0.044). Instead, there was a very strong probability of difference of group 4 compared to the first three groups (first 90 lobectomies): lower conversion rate (Pr1>4=0.992, Pr3>4=0.996, Pr2>4=0.995), lower duration of the operation (Pr1>4=0.946, Pr2>4=0.901, Pr3>4=0.932), less air leak (Pr1>4=0.936, Pr2>4=0.97) and shorter chest tube drainage (Pr1>4=0.94, Pr2>4=0.94, Pr3>4=0.937), as well as shorter hospital stay (Pr2>4=0.94, Pr3>4=0.937).
CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve was bimodal. After the initial 30 lobectomies, oncologic quality of the procedure improved and stabilized. The surgeon became less selective and accepted to proceed with more complex cases (incomplete fissures, pleural adhesions). Efficiency was obtained after 90 lobectomies (shorter operative time and lower conversion rate).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); learning curve; learning tools; lung, lobectomy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27746996      PMCID: PMC5059302          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  25 in total

1.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mark W Onaitis; Rebecca P Petersen; Stafford S Balderson; Eric Toloza; William R Burfeind; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database.

Authors:  Subroto Paul; Nasser K Altorki; Shubin Sheng; Paul C Lee; David H Harpole; Mark W Onaitis; Brendon M Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy and its learning curve. A single center study introducing the technique in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Eric H J Belgers; Jan Siebenga; Anne Marie Bosch; Eric H J van Haren; Ewald C M Bollen
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-10-22

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for stage I lung cancer: A meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Zhengjun Li; Hongxu Liu; LE Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Long-term survival in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs open lobectomy in lung-cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emanuela Taioli; Dong-Seok Lee; Martin Lesser; Raja Flores
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: the learning curve.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Liang Bu; Fan Yang; Jianfeng Li; Yun Li; Jun Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure.

Authors:  I Nagahiro; A Andou; M Aoe; Y Sano; H Date; N Shimizu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  No extensive experience in open procedures is needed to learn lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Lars Konge; René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen; Charlotte Ringsted
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-09-11

9.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson; Rafael S Andrade; Adam Boettcher; Ricardo Bardales; Robert A Kratzke; Peter S Dahlberg; Michael A Maddaus
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Learning Curve of a Young Surgeon's Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy during His First Year Experience in Newly Established Institution.

Authors:  Yong Joon Ra; Hyo Yeong Ahn; Min Su Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-06-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Defining the learning curve of robotic thoracic surgery: what does it take?

Authors:  Alexandra D Power; Desmond M D'Souza; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Robert E Merritt; Peter J Kneuertz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Thoracic surgery training in Europe-the perspective of a trainee.

Authors:  Anna Elisabeth Frick; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Teaching video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy-using an ex vivo simulation model.

Authors:  Marcelo Jimenez; Maria Teresa Gomez-Hernandez
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-17

Review 4.  Training in robotic thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Paul L Linsky; Benjamin Wei
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-01-04

5.  What is difficult about doing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)? A retrospective study comparing VATS anatomical resection and conversion to thoracotomy for lung cancer in a university-based hospital.

Authors:  Si-Wook Kim; Jong-Myeon Hong; Dohun Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Conversion from video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to thoracotomy during major lung resection: how does it affect perioperative outcomes?

Authors:  Joseph Seitlinger; Anne Olland; Sophie Guinard; Gilbert Massard; Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-01

7.  Videothoracoscopic lobectomy training in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Celal Buğra Sezen; Celalettin İbrahim Kocatürk
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 0.332

8.  Factors during training which predict future use of minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Paul E Rothenberg; Byron D Hughes; Farshad Amirkhosravi; Bless P Onaiwu; Ikenna C Okereke
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.