Literature DB >> 22968956

No extensive experience in open procedures is needed to learn lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Lars Konge1, René Horsleben Petersen, Henrik Jessen Hansen, Charlotte Ringsted.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Lobectomies done by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) result in fewer complications and less pain and save total costs compared with the traditional approach. However, the majority of procedures are still performed via open thoracotomies, because VATS lobectomy is considered difficult to learn, requiring experience in open surgery, and causing complications in the initial phase of the learning curve. The aim of this study was to describe a training model appreciating patient safety during training and to explore the initial learning curve for a trainee rather inexperienced in open surgery.
METHODS: A trainee who had performed 14 lobectomies by thoracotomy was enrolled in a training programme at a high-volume VATS centre. The training model included courses and simulations followed by the selection of suitable patients operated on during close expert supervision. Data regarding time, a variety of quality indicators and complications were collected prospectively and compared with experts' performance.
RESULTS: Over 12 months, 29 of 214 VATS lobectomies were performed by the trainee. Twice, the supervisor had to finish the procedure due to technical difficulties. None of the operations were converted to open thoracotomy. Compared with experts, the trainee operated significantly slower [median 120 (range 74-160) vs 100 (range 42-255) min, P = 0.04]; had similar perioperative bleeding [median 100 (range 10-500) vs 50 (range 5-2500) ml, P = 0.79]; had earlier chest tube removal [median 1 (range 1-6) vs 2 (range 1-32) postoperative days, P < 0.001]; and reduced hospital stay [median 3 (range 1-10) vs 4 (range 1-41) days, P < 0.001]. Twenty-three (79%) patients had no complications, while 2 had atrial fibrillation. Pneumothorax after chest tube removal, incisional infection, prolonged pain and need for pleuracentesis were each seen once.
CONCLUSIONS: With thorough preparation of trainees and training on selected patients under close supervision, the learning curve can be overcome with good results even if the trainee has limited prior experience in open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22968956      PMCID: PMC3501313          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  24 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy using a standardized anterior approach.

Authors:  Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Merete Christensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Self-perceived video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy proficiency by recent graduates of North American thoracic residencies.

Authors:  Daniel J Boffa; Sidharta Gangadharan; Michael Kent; Faraz Kerendi; Mark Onaitis; Edward Verrier; Eric Roselli
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 3.  New approaches to the minimally invasive treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward V Houck
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.155

4.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mark W Onaitis; Rebecca P Petersen; Stafford S Balderson; Eric Toloza; William R Burfeind; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Validation of a thoracoscopic lobectomy simulator.

Authors:  Betty C Tong; Monica R Gustafson; Stafford S Balderson; Thomas A D'Amico; Shari L Meyerson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: 3-year initial experience with 200 cases.

Authors:  Diego Gonzalez; Mercedes de la Torre; Marina Paradela; Ricardo Fernandez; Maria Delgado; Jose Garcia; Eva Fieira; Lucia Mendez
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Impact of hospital volume of thoracoscopic lobectomy on primary lung cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Henry S Park; Frank C Detterbeck; Daniel J Boffa; Anthony W Kim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is less costly and morbid than open lobectomy: a retrospective multiinstitutional database analysis.

Authors:  Scott J Swanson; Bryan F Meyers; Candace L Gunnarsson; Matthew Moore; John A Howington; Michael A Maddaus; Robert J McKenna; Daniel L Miller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward Houck; Clark Beeman Fuller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Lobectomy--video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial.

Authors:  T J Kirby; M J Mack; R J Landreneau; T W Rice
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  8 in total

1.  Development and validation of a theoretical test of proficiency for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Mona Meral Savran; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; William Walker; Thomas Schmid; Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: which is the learning curve of an experienced consultant?

Authors:  Antonio Mazzella; Anne Olland; Pierre Emmanuel Falcoz; Stephane Renaud; Nicola Santelmo; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Developing competency in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Lars Konge; René Horsleben Petersen; Charlotte Ringsted
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Small incisions, major complications: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery management of intraoperative complications.

Authors:  William Grossi; Gianluca Masullo; Francesco Londero; Angelo Morelli
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-01-15

5.  VATS lobectomy program: the trainee perspective.

Authors:  Alberto Sandri; Pier Luigi Filosso; Paolo Olivo Lausi; Enrico Ruffini; Alberto Oliaro
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  National adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the Italian VATS register evaluation.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Luca Bertolaccini; Mirko Barone; Dario Amore; Desideria Argnani; Gino Zaccagna; Piergiorgio Solli; Gaetano Di Rienzo; Carlo Curcio; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Trainees Can Safely Learn Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy despite Limited Experience in Open Lobectomy.

Authors:  Woo Sik Yu; Chang Young Lee; Seokkee Lee; Do Jung Kim; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-05

8.  Initial experience with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer performed by a surgeon who did not have previous experience performing multiportal thoracoscopic surgery: a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Youngkyu Moon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.005

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.