Literature DB >> 32082853

Videothoracoscopic lobectomy training in non-small cell lung cancer.

Celal Buğra Sezen1, Celalettin İbrahim Kocatürk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies performed by a training consultant or an experienced consultant.
METHODS: The study included 103 patients (81 males, 22 females; mean age 59.6±9.5 years; range, 32 to 84 years) who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy due to non-small cell lung cancer. The training consultant assisted on the same side with the experienced consultant during the operations of the experienced consultant. The experienced consultant observed in the operating room and provided advice from a distance during the first five operations of the training consultant. Comorbidities, postoperative complications, and mortality were evaluated.
RESULTS: Patients" demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were similar between the two surgeons (p>0.05). Operative time, incidence of prolonged air leak, and length of hospital stay were higher in procedures performed by the training consultant (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in rates of life-threatening complications or mortality.
CONCLUSION: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy can be performed safely by surgeons in training. Effective training programs may produce outcomes comparable to those of experienced surgeons.
Copyright © 2019, Turkish League Against Rheumatism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; lung cancer; thoracoscopic lobectomy; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 32082853      PMCID: PMC7021397          DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.16509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg        ISSN: 1301-5680            Impact factor:   0.332


  19 in total

1.  Developing a VATS lobectomy programme--can VATS lobectomy be taught?

Authors:  Jonathan Ferguson; William Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mark W Onaitis; Rebecca P Petersen; Stafford S Balderson; Eric Toloza; William R Burfeind; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections.

Authors:  Gaetano Rocco; Eveline Internullo; Stephen D Cassivi; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Mark K Ferguson
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

Review 4.  Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

5.  Assessment of competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: A Danish nationwide study.

Authors:  René Horsleben Petersen; Kirsten Gjeraa; Katrine Jensen; Lars Borgbjerg Møller; Henrik Jessen Hansen; Lars Konge
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 6.  Reasons for conversion during VATS lobectomy: what happens with increased experience.

Authors:  Dario Amore; Davide Di Natale; Roberto Scaramuzzi; Carlo Curcio
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

7.  Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgical Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: Description of a Learning Curve.

Authors:  Fei Yao; Jian Wang; Ju Yao; Fangrong Hang; Shiqi Cao; Yongke Cao
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward Houck; Clark Beeman Fuller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Peter Goldstraw; Kari Chansky; John Crowley; Ramon Rami-Porta; Hisao Asamura; Wilfried E E Eberhardt; Andrew G Nicholson; Patti Groome; Alan Mitchell; Vanessa Bolejack
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 10.  Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson; Shawn S Groth; Susan J Duval; Scott J Swanson; Michael A Maddaus
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of short-term quality of life in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy.

Authors:  Levent Cansever; Celal Buğra Sezen; Onur Volkan Yaran; Mehmet Ali Bedirhan
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 0.332

2.  The effect of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on chronic postoperative pain and long-term quality of life.

Authors:  Levent Cansever; Celal Buğra Sezen; Onur Volkan Yaran; Salih Duman; Yunus Seyrek; Merve Hatipoğlu; Kadriye Öneş; Mehmet Ali Bedirhan
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 0.332

3.  Effect of intraoperative blood loss on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lijun Yao; Weiwei Wang
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 0.332

4.  Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes and the Learning Curve Wherein a Thoracic Resident Doctor Performed Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomical Lung Resection for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Fujita; Shigeyuki Morino; Akihiro Nakamura
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.