| Literature DB >> 27741291 |
Kota Fukai1,2, Sei Harada1,2, Miho Iida3, Ayako Kurihara1,2, Ayano Takeuchi1, Kazuyo Kuwabara1, Daisuke Sugiyama1, Tomonori Okamura1, Miki Akiyama2,4, Yuji Nishiwaki5, Yuko Oguma6,7, Asako Suzuki2, Chizuru Suzuki2, Akiyoshi Hirayama2, Masahiro Sugimoto2, Tomoyoshi Soga2,4, Masaru Tomita2,4, Toru Takebayashi1,2,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity is known to be preventive against various non-communicable diseases. We investigated the relationship between daily physical activity level and plasma metabolites using a targeted metabolomics approach in a population-based study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27741291 PMCID: PMC5065216 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the original population (n = 808).
| Characteristic | TPA-Q1 (n = 205) | Q2 (n = 210) | Q3 (n = 192) | Q4 (n = 201) | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total physical activity (MET-hours/week) | 24.7 | (0–43.7) | 68.3 | (44–96.2) | 133.5 | (96.5–191.6) | 273.0 | (192.8–630.2) | < 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 62.3 | (7.9) | 62.9 | (7.7) | 63.4 | (7.1) | 62.2 | (8) | 0.457 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 | (3.1) | 23.7 | (3.3) | 23.8 | (2.9) | 23.0 | (2.9) | 0.032 |
| Current smoking, Yes | 23.9% | (49/205) | 26.7% | (56/210) | 25.5% | (49/192) | 34.3% | (69/201) | 0.022 |
| Ex-smoker | 55.6% | (114/205) | 57.1% | (120/210) | 54.2% | (104/192) | 41.3% | (83/201) | - |
| Alcohol intake (g/day) | 28.6 | (40.9) | 28.3 | (32.2) | 27.4 | (28.9) | 34.2 | (31.6) | 0.004 |
| Energy without alcohol (kcal/day) | 1790.5 | (391.8) | 1815.5 | (504.1) | 1889.0 | (390.7) | 1983.8 | (448.6) | < 0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.4 | (16.8) | 130.7 | (19.3) | 132.7 | (18.7) | 129.9 | (19.7) | 0.325 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.5 | (10.1) | 78.7 | (10.7) | 78.4 | (10.4) | 77.8 | (11.7) | 0.293 |
| Hypertension | 52.7% | (108/205) | 54.8% | (115/210) | 54.2% | (104/192) | 43.3% | (87/201) | 0.072 |
| Hypertension on medication | 37.1% | (76/205) | 37.6% | (79/210) | 34.9% | (67/192) | 26.4% | (53/201) | 0.046 |
| FPG (mg/dL) | 101.0 | (80–175) | 100.5 | (83–200) | 101.0 | (81–211) | 100.0 | (76–230) | 0.996 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.7 | (4.9–8.2) | 5.7 | (4.8–10) | 5.6 | (5–9.4) | 5.6 | (4.9–9.3) | 0.473 |
| IGT | 29.8% | (61/205) | 26.7% | (56/210) | 26% | (50/192) | 24.9% | (50/201) | 0.714 |
| IGT on medication | 14.1% | (29/205) | 9.5% | (20/210) | 8.9% | (17/192) | 8.5% | (17/201) | 0.201 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 127.6 | (31–872) | 135.8 | (33–1879) | 123.3 | (32–565) | 110.1 | (37–431) | < 0.001 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 114.9 | (29.4) | 116.6 | (28.3) | 119.3 | (31.4) | 114.0 | (31.6) | 0.177 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 59.5 | (14.9) | 62.6 | (14.3) | 63.3 | (15.6) | 67.6 | (17.2) | < 0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia | 49.8% | (102/205) | 54.3% | (114/210) | 46.9% | (90/192) | 37.3% | (75/201) | 0.006 |
| Dyslipidemia on medication | 18.5% | (38/205) | 15.2% | (32/210) | 14.1% | (27/192) | 8.0% | (16/201) | 0.021 |
| History of coronary heart disease | 3.9% | (8/205) | 3.3% | (7/210) | 1.6% | (3/192) | 0.5% | (1/201) | 0.082 |
| History of cerebral vascular disorder | 5.4% | (11/205) | 2.4% | (5/210) | 6.3% | (12/192) | 3.0% | (6/201) | 0.182 |
| History of cancer | 3.9% | (8/205) | 6.7% | (14/210) | 4.7% | (9/192) | 5.0% | (10/201) | 0.585 |
aReported as median (range).
bReported as mean (standard deviation).
cP-values of the chi-sqare test for categorical variables, analysis of variance for continuous variables.
1Hypertension: systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, or on medication.
2Impaired glucose tolerance: FPG ≥ 110 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5%, or on medication.
3Dyslipidemia: triglyceride ≥ 150 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol ≥ 140 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol ≤ 40 mg/dL, or on medication.
TPA, total physical activity; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.
Fig 1Correlation matrix for plasma metabolite levels: Pearson correlation coefficients for 13 metabolite concentrations (log-transferred) associated with TPA in the original dataset.
Fig 2Associations between TPA and metabolite measurements.
Associations between metabolites and TPA level (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) in the original (left) and replication (right) populations. Linear regression between each metabolite and TPA was performed. Raw p-values for unadjusted and adjusted models are shown. Fold change (with 95% CI) per one-unit increase in TPA level were calculated using the beta of the linear regression analysis of the unadjusted model. The blue bars mean lower concentrations and the red bars mean higher concentrations in highly active groups. Metabolites associated with TPA levels are shown in this figure (FDR p <0.05 for unadjusted model in the original population). Replication analysis was performed only for these metabolites. AAs, amino acids; CI, confidence interval. #Adjusted for age, BMI, smoking (never/former/current), current alcohol drinker (yes/no), and energy intake (high/low).
Fig 3Associations between sedentary behavior level and metabolite measurements.
Associations between metabolites and sitting time level (long, medium, short) in the original (left) and replication (right) populations. Linear regression between each metabolite was performed, and p-values for unadjusted and adjusted models are shown. Fold change per one-unit decrease with 95% CI in sitting time level were calculated using the beta of the linear regression analysis of the unadjusted model. Blue bars mean lower concentrations in the shorter sitting time groups. Only metabolites associated with sitting time levels (p <0.05 for the unadjusted model in the original population) among metabolites associated with TPA (shown in Fig 2) are shown. #Adjusted for age, BMI, smoking (never/former/current), current alcohol drinker (yes/no), and energy intake (high/low).
Fig 4Cross-classified multivariable-adjusted mean concentrations of metabolites associated with TPA and sedentary behavior levels.
Multivariable-adjusted (age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, energy intake) mean concentrations were calculated by groups cross-classified by TPA level and sitting time. Metabolites that showed a strong association with both exposures (Figs 2 and 3) are shown. P-values for interactions between TPA and sitting time levels were tested. Details of the number of subjects in each cross-classified group are shown in S2 Fig.