Literature DB >> 27739440

'Non-classical' HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Morgan Ballard1, Florencia Jalikis2, Gregor Krings3, Rodney A Schmidt2, Yunn-Yi Chen3, Mara H Rendi2, Suzanne M Dintzis2, Kristin C Jensen1,4, Robert B West1, Richard K Sibley1, Megan L Troxell1, Kimberly H Allison1.   

Abstract

The 2013 CAP/ASCO HER2 Testing Guidelines Update modified HER2 FISH categories such that some cases with 'monosomy', 'co-amplification/polysomy', low-level increased HER2 signals or clustered heterogeneity now are considered amplified or equivocal. This study examines the frequency and clinico-pathologic characteristics of breast cancers with equivocal or 'non-classical' HER2 FISH results. Breast cancers (2001-2014) with HER2 FISH results, HER2 immunohistochemistry, ER, grade, and age from three institutions (Stanford, UCSF, UWMC) were collected. HER2 FISH was interpreted using the updated recommendations. Amplified cases with non-classical results were grouped into the following categories: (1) 'monosomy' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell<4.0); (2) 'co-amplified' (ratio<2.0, mean HER2/cell ≥6.0); (3) 'low amplified' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell 4.0-5.9). Heterogeneous cases with clustered HER2-positive cells were also included. Of 8068 cases, 5.2% were equivocal and 4.6% had a 'non-classical' HER2 amplified result; 1.4% 'monosomy', 0.8% 'co-amplified', 2.1% 'low amplified', and 0.3% clustered heterogeneity. These cancers had a high frequency of ER positive (80.4%), Nottingham grade 3 (52.1%) results. The highest percentage of grade 3 cancers (66.7%) and positive HER2 immunohistochemistry (31.7%) was in the 'co-amplified' group. The 'monosomy' group had the highest percent grade 1 cancers (13.3%) and was most frequently HER2 immunohistochemistry negative (30.1%). Equivocal cases had very similar characteristics to the 'low-amplified' category. Cases with non-classical HER2 amplification or equivocal results are typically ER positive, higher grade cancers. 'Co-amplified' cases have the highest frequencies of aggressive characteristics and 'monosomy' cases the highest frequencies of lower risk features. With little clinical outcomes data currently available on these non-classical HER2 results, these results support the current classification scheme for HER2 FISH, with case-by-case correlation with additional clinical-pathologic factors when evaluating whether to offer HER2-targeted therapies in these non-classical cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27739440     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  29 in total

1.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas.

Authors:  M F Press; L Bernstein; P A Thomas; L F Meisner; J Y Zhou; Y Ma; G Hung; R A Robinson; C Harris; A El-Naggar; D J Slamon; R N Phillips; J S Ross; S R Wolman; K J Flom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer--re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data.

Authors:  Oliver C Stoss; Andreas Scheel; Iris Nagelmeier; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Thomas Henkel; Giuseppe Viale; Bharat Jasani; Michael Untch; Josef Rüschoff
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification: impact on patient outcome and a clinically relevant definition.

Authors:  Alastair I Bartlett; Jane Starcyznski; Tammy Robson; Alex Maclellan; Fiona M Campbell; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Annette Hasenburg; Christos Markopoulos; Caroline Seynaeve; Daniel Rea; John M S Bartlett
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Marked Intratumoral Heterogeneity of the Proto-Oncogene Her-2/neu Determined by Three Different Detection Systems.

Authors:  Louis P. Pertschuk; Constantine A. Axiotis; Joseph G. Feldman; Yong-Doo Kim; Sebastian J. Karavattayhayyil; Lorraine Braithwaite
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2/neu in breast cancer--a rare event.

Authors:  Wedad Hanna; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Harriette J Kahn
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  HER2 and chromosome 17 effect on patient outcome in the N9831 adjuvant trastuzumab trial.

Authors:  Edith A Perez; Monica M Reinholz; David W Hillman; Kathleen S Tenner; Matthew J Schroeder; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; George W Sledge; Lyndsay N Harris; Julie R Gralow; Amylou C Dueck; Rhett P Ketterling; James N Ingle; Wilma L Lingle; Peter A Kaufman; Daniel W Visscher; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Clinicopathologic Significance of the Intratumoral Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Adjuvant Trastuzumab.

Authors:  Hee Jin Lee; Joo Young Kim; So Yeon Park; In Ah Park; In Hye Song; Jong Han Yu; Jin-Hee Ahn; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing in breast cancer: panel summary and guidelines.

Authors:  Gail H Vance; Todd S Barry; Kenneth J Bloom; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; David G Hicks; Robert B Jenkins; Diane L Persons; Raymond R Tubbs; M Elizabeth H Hammond
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Predicting degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in NSABP trial B-31.

Authors:  Katherine L Pogue-Geile; Chungyeul Kim; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Noriko Tanaka; Hanna Bandos; Patrick G Gavin; Debora Fumagalli; Lynn C Goldstein; Nour Sneige; Eike Burandt; Yusuke Taniyama; Olga L Bohn; Ahwon Lee; Seung-Il Kim; Megan L Reilly; Matthew Y Remillard; Nicole L Blackmon; Seong-Rim Kim; Zachary D Horne; Priya Rastogi; Louis Fehrenbacher; Edward H Romond; Sandra M Swain; Eleftherios P Mamounas; D Lawrence Wickerham; Charles E Geyer; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Genotypic intratumoral heterogeneity in breast carcinoma with HER2/neu amplification: evaluation according to ASCO/CAP criteria.

Authors:  Matteo Brunelli; Erminia Manfrin; Guido Martignoni; Keith Miller; Andrea Remo; Daniela Reghellin; Samantha Bersani; Stefano Gobbo; Albino Eccher; Marco Chilosi; Franco Bonetti
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.493

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Applying the New Guidelines of HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Huina Zhang; Ioana Moisini; Rana M Ajabnoor; Bradley M Turner; David G Hicks
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Updates on breast biomarkers.

Authors:  Saleh Najjar; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.535

3.  Computer-aided scoring of erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) gene amplification status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Alyson Yoder; Landon J Inge; Chen-Chun Chen; Vijay R Marati; Trung Kien Nguyen; Karel Zuiderveld; Jim Martin; Sarah Gladden; Mohammad Saleh Miri; Raghavan Venugopal; Bryan Lopez; Jim Ranger-Moore; Christoph Guetter
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  Concordance of Genomic Alterations between Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Tumor Tissue in Chinese Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Bing Xu; Guangyu Shan; Qixi Wu; Weiwei Li; Hongjiang Wang; Hui Li; Yaping Yang; Qiming Long; Ping Zhao
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.375

5.  Retrospective observational study of HER2 immunohistochemistry in borderline breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, with an emphasis on Group 2 (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0, HER2 copy number <4.0 signals/cell) cases.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Islam M Miligy; Cecily M Quinn; Elena Provenzano; Abeer M Shaaban; Caterina Marchiò; Michael S Toss; Grace Gallagy; Ciara Murray; Janice Walshe; Ayaka Katayama; Karim Eldib; Nahla Badr; Bruce Tanchel; Rebecca Millican-Slater; Colin Purdie; Dave Purnell; Sarah E Pinder; Ian O Ellis; Andrew H S Lee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The Dilemma of HER2 Double-equivocal Breast Carcinomas: Genomic Profiling and Implications for Treatment.

Authors:  Caterina Marchiò; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Laura Annaratone; Felipe C Geyer; Tiziana Venesio; Enrico Berrino; Ludovica Verdun di Cantogno; Andrea Garofoli; Nelson Rangel; Laura Casorzo; Carmine dell'Aglio; Patrizia Gugliotta; Elena Trisolini; Alessandra Beano; Francesca Pietribiasi; Renzo Orlassino; Paola Cassoni; Achille Pich; Filippo Montemurro; Marcella Mottolese; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Enzo Medico; Charlotte K Y Ng; Giuseppe Viale; Anna Sapino
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Intratumor heterogeneity defines treatment-resistant HER2+ breast tumors.

Authors:  Inga H Rye; Anne Trinh; Anna B Saetersdal; Daniel Nebdal; Ole Christian Lingjaerde; Vanessa Almendro; Kornelia Polyak; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Åslaug Helland; Florian Markowetz; Hege G Russnes
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jie Song; Alexander Yu; Diana Munoz; Song Han; Manjunath Nimmakayalu; Peter C Hu; Jianli Dong
Journal:  Cancer Med J       Date:  2021-04-15

9.  Triple-Positive Breast Carcinoma: Histopathologic Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jennifer Zeng; Marcia Edelweiss; Dara S Ross; Bin Xu; Tracy-Ann Moo; Edi Brogi; Timothy M D'Alfonso
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.686

10.  Breast carcinomas with low amplified/equivocal HER2 by Ish: potential supporting role of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Cristiana Ercolani; Caterina Marchiò; Anna Di Benedetto; Alessandra Fabi; Letizia Perracchio; Patrizia Vici; Francesca Sperati; Simonetta Buglioni; Vincenzo Arena; Edoardo Pescarmona; Anna Sapino; Irene Terrenato; Marcella Mottolese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.