Literature DB >> 26403781

Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer--re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data.

Oliver C Stoss1, Andreas Scheel2, Iris Nagelmeier3, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus4, Thomas Henkel1, Giuseppe Viale5, Bharat Jasani6, Michael Untch7, Josef Rüschoff1,3.   

Abstract

Recently the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists have updated their clinical practice guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer. In order to evaluate these new recommendations, we have re-assessed the HER2 status of 6018 breast cancer cases of the screening population for the HERceptin adjuvant (HERA) trial that were originally centrally tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization based on the FDA-released test guidelines. According to the most recent 2013 ASCO/CAP recommendations, 3380 (56.2%) cases were classified as HER2 positive compared with 3359 (55.8%) applying the HERA/FDA scheme and 3339 (55.5%) applying the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Twenty-one cases switched from negative (HERA/FDA scheme) to positive (2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines). This group is characterized by a mean HER2 gene copy number of ≥6.0, polysomy or co-amplification of CEP17 with an average CEP17 count of 5, and with HER2 receptor overexpression in 75% of cases. On the basis of the HER2 gene copy number alone, we observe 494 cases (8.2%) that are in the equivocal range. Most of these cases (>80%) were also nondecisive by immunohistochemistry (score 2+) irrespective of whether ratio was <2.0>. The number of equivocal cases that would require HER2 reflex testing decreases to 113 (1.9%) if in addition to the HER2 gene copy number also the ratio of HER2 and CEP17 copy numbers is considered via dual-color in situ hybridization. The combination of applying the HER2 mean gene copy number as well as the HER2/CEP17 ratio to define equivocal test decisions by fluorescence in situ hybridization as proposed by the current ASCO/CAP guidelines appears to be a more optimum approach to adopt in order to avoid or minimize reporting of false negative results. Using the mean HER2 gene copy number alone for decision making results in a significant increase of equivocal cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26403781     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  16 in total

1.  Alterations in the TOP2A and HER2 genes: association with adjuvant anthracycline sensitivity in human breast cancers.

Authors:  Dennis J Slamon; Michael F Press
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.

Authors:  Lavinia P Middleton; Kathy M Price; Pamela Puig; Lori J Heydon; Emily Tarco; Nour Sneige; Kaye Barr; Michael T Deavers
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 intergroup adjuvant trial.

Authors:  Edith A Perez; Vera J Suman; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Peter A Kaufman; Wilma L Lingle; Patrick J Flynn; James N Ingle; Daniel Visscher; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Polysomy 17 in breast cancer: clinicopathologic significance and impact on HER-2 testing.

Authors:  Isabelle Vanden Bempt; Peter Van Loo; Maria Drijkoningen; Patrick Neven; Ann Smeets; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Robert Paridaens; Christiane De Wolf-Peeters
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; A S Coates; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Disease-free survival according to degree of HER2 amplification for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without 1 year of trastuzumab: the HERA Trial.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Marion Procter; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Evandro de Azambuja; Urania Dafni; Josef Rueschoff; Bruce Jordan; Stella Dolci; Mark Abramovitz; Oliver Stoss; Giuseppe Viale; Richard D Gelber; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Brian Leyland-Jones
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Does chromosome 17 centromere copy number predict polysomy in breast cancer? A fluorescence in situ hybridization and microarray-based CGH analysis.

Authors:  Caterina Marchiò; Maryou B Lambros; Patrizia Gugliotta; Ludovica Verdun Di Cantogno; Cristina Botta; Barbara Pasini; David S P Tan; Alan Mackay; Kerry Fenwick; Narinder Tamber; Gianni Bussolati; Alan Ashworth; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Anna Sapino
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  HER2 staining intensity in HER2-positive disease: relationship with FISH amplification and clinical outcome in the HERA trial of adjuvant trastuzumab.

Authors:  L Zabaglo; O Stoss; J Rüschoff; D Zielinski; J Salter; M Arfi; I Bradbury; U Dafni; M Piccart-Gebhart; M Procter; M Dowsett
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  10 in total

1.  'Non-classical' HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Morgan Ballard; Florencia Jalikis; Gregor Krings; Rodney A Schmidt; Yunn-Yi Chen; Mara H Rendi; Suzanne M Dintzis; Kristin C Jensen; Robert B West; Richard K Sibley; Megan L Troxell; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Incidence and Survival by Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status in Young Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer: SEER, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Alexandra Thomas; Anthony Rhoads; Jonathan Suhl; Kristin M Conway; William G Hundley; Lacey R McNally; Jacob Oleson; Susan A Melin; Charles F Lynch; Paul A Romitti
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Applying the New Guidelines of HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Huina Zhang; Ioana Moisini; Rana M Ajabnoor; Bradley M Turner; David G Hicks
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Comparison of HercepTest™ mAb pharmDx (Dako Omnis, GE001) with Ventana PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) in breast cancer: correlation with HER2 amplification and HER2 low status.

Authors:  Josef Rüschoff; Michael Friedrich; Iris Nagelmeier; Matthias Kirchner; Lena M Andresen; Karin Salomon; Bryce Portier; Simone T Sredni; Hans Ulrich Schildhaus; Bharat Jasani; Marius Grzelinski; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.535

Review 5.  Updates on breast biomarkers.

Authors:  Saleh Najjar; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.535

6.  Computer-aided scoring of erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) gene amplification status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Alyson Yoder; Landon J Inge; Chen-Chun Chen; Vijay R Marati; Trung Kien Nguyen; Karel Zuiderveld; Jim Martin; Sarah Gladden; Mohammad Saleh Miri; Raghavan Venugopal; Bryan Lopez; Jim Ranger-Moore; Christoph Guetter
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-07-05

7.  Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes.

Authors:  Kristen C Blanton; Allison M Deal; Kathleen A Kaiser-Rogers; Carey K Anders; Siobhan M O'Connor; Johann D Hertel; Benjamin C Calhoun
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.090

8.  Regional Variability in Percentage of Breast Cancers Reported as Positive for HER2 in California: Implications of Patient Demographics on Laboratory Benchmarks.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Eugene E Carneal; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett L Gomez; Christina A Clarke; Kristin C Jensen; Allison W Kurian; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.400

9.  Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Wei Ding; Ke Sun; Xiaoling Wang; Liming Xu; Xiaodong Teng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Breast carcinomas with low amplified/equivocal HER2 by Ish: potential supporting role of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Cristiana Ercolani; Caterina Marchiò; Anna Di Benedetto; Alessandra Fabi; Letizia Perracchio; Patrizia Vici; Francesca Sperati; Simonetta Buglioni; Vincenzo Arena; Edoardo Pescarmona; Anna Sapino; Irene Terrenato; Marcella Mottolese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.