Literature DB >> 35029776

Updates on breast biomarkers.

Saleh Najjar1, Kimberly H Allison2.   

Abstract

Recent advancements in breast cancer treatment have ushered in a new era of precision medicine. Novel trials have led to the approval of a growing list of personalized therapies and corresponding biomarkers. These advancements have shifted the pathologist's practice into a leading role in the management breast cancer. Understanding the complex algorithms and diagnostic modalities used to assess predictive and prognostic biomarkers is central for quality oncology care. ER and HER2 subcategorize breast cancers into treatment groups under which different biomarkers and therapies are indicated, while they also serve as predictive biomarkers for specific targeted treatments. This review will cover the evolution and latest updates of the CAP/ASCO guidelines relevant to these two important biomarkers in breast cancer. Still evolving concepts such as HER2 heterogeneity, HER2 "low," and HER2-mutated cancers have the potential to continue to change HER2 testing in breast cancers. In addition to ER and HER2, biomarkers used in specific clinical scenarios will be covered. In early-stage ER-positive/HER2-negative disease, multi-gene expression panels (such as OncotypeDX) have emerged as the new standard biomarker when determining if chemotherapy should be added to endocrine therapy. In the more aggressive ER-negative/HER2-positive or triple negative early-stage breast cancers, response to neoadjuvant therapy has proved to be a useful biomarker to help determine if additional therapy should be added for patients with an incomplete response. Ki67 has also recently emerged as a marker that can be used to identify the highest risk ER-positive and HER2-negative cancers if considering adding a cell cycle inhibitor (abemaciclib) to endocrine therapy. Importantly, in the metastatic setting, numerous predictive biomarkers have emerged, including recommendations for germline BRCA mutation testing for all metastatic patients (to determine if PARP inhibitor therapy is an option) and other ER-/HER2-dependent biomarkers such as PD-L1 (for potential immunotherapy in triple negative patients) and PIK3CA mutation status (for potential PI3K inhibitor therapy in ER-positive metastatic patients). Other less common biomarkers of targeted therapy options (e.g., MSI/MMR, TMB, NTRK) as well as comprehensive genomic profiling to identify uncommon targets are also available in the metastatic setting to determine additional treatment options.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Predictive; Prognostic; Biomarker; HER2; ER; Gene expression panel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35029776     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03267-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.535


  65 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic cancer biomarkers revisited.

Authors:  Kenneth P H Pritzker
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.225

2.  HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update Summary.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth Hale Hammond; Kimberly H Allison; Brittany E Harvey; Lisa M McShane; Mitchell Dowsett
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Mitchell Dowsett; Shannon E McKernin; Lisa A Carey; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Daniel F Hayes; Sunil R Lakhani; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Jane Perlmutter; Charles M Perou; Meredith M Regan; David L Rimm; W Fraser Symmans; Emina E Torlakovic; Leticia Varella; Giuseppe Viale; Tracey F Weisberg; Lisa M McShane; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Update.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Mitchell Dowsett; Shannon E McKernin; Lisa A Carey; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Daniel F Hayes; Sunil R Lakhani; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Jane Perlmutter; Charles M Perou; Meredith M Regan; David L Rimm; W Fraser Symmans; Emina E Torlakovic; Leticia Varella; Giuseppe Viale; Tracey F Weisberg; Lisa M McShane; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 5.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version).

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Clinical utility of epidermal growth factor receptor expression for selecting patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer for treatment with erlotinib.

Authors:  Gary M Clark; Denni M Zborowski; Jennifer L Culbertson; Marlo Whitehead; Michelle Savoie; Lesley Seymour; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  PIK3CA Mutation as Potential Poor Prognostic Marker in Asian Female Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoon Ah Cho; Seung Yeon Ko; Yong Joon Suh; Sanghwa Kim; Jung Ho Park; Hye-Rim Park; Jinwon Seo; Hyo Geun Choi; Ho Suk Kang; Hyun Lim; Ha Young Park; Mi Jung Kwon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Experimentally Deduced Criteria for Detection of Clinically Relevant Fusion 3' Oncogenes from FFPE Bulk RNA Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Elizaveta Rabushko; Maxim Sorokin; Maria Suntsova; Alexander P Seryakov; Denis V Kuzmin; Elena Poddubskaya; Anton A Buzdin
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.