Literature DB >> 27730313

Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment.

Zhi-Geng Jin1, Zhuo-Qi Zhang2, Li-Min Jing3, Yu-Jie Wei3, Jiao Zhang3, Jian-Ping Luo3, Sheng-Li Yang3, Dong-Xing Ma3, Ying Liu3, Wei Han3, Yong Yang3, Hui-Liang Liu4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) for coronary lesion assessment by directly comparing with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). From October 2014 to December 2015, 40 patients (58 lesions) who had undergone both DARCA and IVUS were included in the image analysis. The minimum lumen diameter (MLD), lesion length, reference vessel diameter (RVD) and percent diameter stenosis at the same lesion, were identified and assessed. Significant correlation with IVUS was found for DARCA in either lesion length (r = 0.90, P < 0.001) or RVD (r = 0.81, P < 0.001) comparison. DARCA had fair correlation with IVUS for both MLD (r = 0.65, P < 0.001) and diameter stenosis (r = 0.48, P < 0.001). From the Bland-Altman plots, there was a good agreement between DARCA and IVUS regarding MLD (mean difference: -0.23 mm, 95 % limits of agreement: -0.96 to 0.50 mm) and RVD (mean difference: -0.15 mm, 95 % limits of agreement: -0.85 to 0.55 mm), while lesser agreement was found on lesion length (mean difference: -3.39 mm, 95 % limits of agreement: -12.63 to 5.85 mm) and diameter stenosis (mean difference: 4.82 %, 95 % limits of agreement: -17.05 to 26.68 %). There is an adequate correlation and agreement between DARCA and IVUS in coronary lesion assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Intravascular ultrasound; Quantitative coronary angiography; Rotational coronary angiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27730313     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0999-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  27 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  A novel dual-axis rotational coronary angiography evaluation of coronary artery disease--case presentation and review.

Authors:  Paul A Hudson; Andrew J Klein; Michael S Kim; Onno Wink; Adam Hansgen; Ivan P Casserly; John C Messenger; S Y James Chen; John D Carroll; Joel A Garcia
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Rotational X-ray coronary angiography.

Authors:  Subha V Raman; Ronald Morford; Matthew Neff; Talal T Attar; Gilbert Kukielka; Raymond D Magorien; Charles A Bush
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Coronary lesions quantification with dual-axis rotational coronary angiography.

Authors:  Leire Unzué Vallejo; Juan Luis Delcán Domínguez; Ana Alegría Barrero; Juan Medina Peralta; Francisco José Rodríguez Rodrigo; Jose Luis Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2012-12-05

5.  Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen.

Authors:  Z Vlodaver; R Frech; R A Van Tassel; J E Edwards
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries.

Authors:  I De Scheerder; F De Man; M C Herregods; K Wilczek; L Barrios; E Raymenants; W Desmet; H De Geest; J Piessens
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--Correlation between subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-11

8.  Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory.

Authors:  Joel A Garcia; S-Y James Chen; John C Messenger; Ivan P Casserly; Adam Hansgen; Onno Wink; Babak Movassaghi; Andrew J Klein; John D Carroll
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Klaus Empen; Eberhard Kuon; Astrid Hummel; Chris Gebauer; Marcus Dörr; Raik Könemann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Alexander Staudt; Kerstin Weitmann; Thorsten Reffelmann; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Ahmad Farshid; Jaya Chandrasekhar; Donald McLean
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.037

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Dimitri Buytaert; Benny Drieghe; Frédéric Van Heuverswyn; Jan De Pooter; Peter Gheeraert; Daniël De Wolf; Yves Taeymans; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.