Literature DB >> 23615833

Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice.

Ahmad Farshid1, Jaya Chandrasekhar, Donald McLean.   

Abstract

Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) is a new imaging technique involving three-dimensional rotation of the gantry around the patient with simultaneous left to right and craniocaudal movements. This allows complete imaging of the left or right coronary tree with a single acquisition run. Previous small studies have indicated that DARCA is associated with reduced radiation dose and contrast use in comparison with standard coronary angiography (SCA). We conducted a registry of unselected patients undergoing DARCA or SCA. DARCA was used in 107 patients and SCA in 105 patients. Mean number of acquisition runs was 2.6 for DARCA and 6.9 for SCA (P < 0.0001). Mean radiation dose (dose-area product, DAP) was 30.4 Gy cm(2) for SCA and 15.9 Gy cm(2) for DARCA (P < 0.0001). Mean contrast volume was 41.7 ml for SCA and 25.7 ml for DARCA (P < 0.0001). Case time for DARCA in the first half of the study was 20.8 ± 1.4 min compared with 15.2 ± 2.0 min in the second half of the study (P = 0.0015), suggesting a learning curve. In the DARCA group, 64 % of patients required only two acquisition runs for complete and satisfactory imaging. There were no adverse effects resulting from DARCA. Two cases are presented to illustrate the diagnostic ability of DARCA. DARCA was associated with a 48 % reduction in radiation dose and 36 % reduction in contrast volume in comparison with SCA, with comparable diagnostic ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23615833     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-013-0349-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  19 in total

1.  Association between deteriorated renal function and long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Manabu Ogita; Kenichi Sakakura; Tomohiro Nakamura; Hiroshi Funayama; Hiroshi Wada; Ryo Naito; Yoshitaka Sugawara; Norifumi Kubo; Junya Ako; Shin-ichi Momomura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Prediction of the no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention using coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Hiroto Harigaya; Sadako Motoyama; Masayoshi Sarai; Kaori Inoue; Tomonori Hara; Masanori Okumura; Hiroyuki Naruse; Junnichi Ishii; Hitoshi Hishida; Yukio Ozaki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of coronary plaque morphology in patients with stable angina.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Takashi Fukunaga; Seitaro Oda; Kazuo Awai; Takeshi Nakaura; Joji Urata; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.

Authors:  Antonio E Gómez-Menchero; José F Díaz; Carlos Sánchez-González; Rosa Cardenal; Amit B Sanghvi; Jessica Roa-Garrido; José L Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2012-04-01

5.  Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark J Eisenberg; Jonathan Afilalo; Patrick R Lawler; Michal Abrahamowicz; Hugues Richard; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Klaus Empen; Eberhard Kuon; Astrid Hummel; Chris Gebauer; Marcus Dörr; Raik Könemann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Alexander Staudt; Kerstin Weitmann; Thorsten Reffelmann; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  James T Maddux; Onno Wink; John C Messenger; Bertron M Groves; Robert Liao; Jodi Strzelczyk; Shiuh-Yung Chen; John D Carroll
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation.

Authors:  Roxana Mehran; Eve D Aymong; Eugenia Nikolsky; Zoran Lasic; Ioannis Iakovou; Martin Fahy; Gary S Mintz; Alexandra J Lansky; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; George Dangas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Andrew H Haims; Edward P Monico; James A Brink; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Shigeru Nakamura; Tomoko Kobayashi; Atsushi Funatsu; Tadahisa Okada; Maria Mauti; Yuki Waizumi; Shinichi Yamada
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment.

Authors:  Zhi-Geng Jin; Zhuo-Qi Zhang; Li-Min Jing; Yu-Jie Wei; Jiao Zhang; Jian-Ping Luo; Sheng-Li Yang; Dong-Xing Ma; Ying Liu; Wei Han; Yong Yang; Hui-Liang Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  First reported revascularization of complex occlusion of the right coronary artery using the IVUS-guided reverse CART technique via a gastroepiploic artery graft.

Authors:  Jian Dai; Osamu Katoh; Hua Zhou; Eisho Kyo
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography.

Authors:  Zhi-Geng Jin; Rui Bai; Yi Li; Yong Yang; Wei Han; Qing Zhao; Lu Zhang; Hui-Liang Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Dimitri Buytaert; Benny Drieghe; Frédéric Van Heuverswyn; Jan De Pooter; Peter Gheeraert; Daniël De Wolf; Yves Taeymans; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.