Literature DB >> 15390246

Rotational X-ray coronary angiography.

Subha V Raman1, Ronald Morford, Matthew Neff, Talal T Attar, Gilbert Kukielka, Raymond D Magorien, Charles A Bush.   

Abstract

We designed and implemented a digital flat-panel-based rotational X-ray coronary angiography technique hypothesizing that luminal disease could be identified with less radiation exposure and contrast usage compared to conventional angiography. Individuals scheduled for diagnostic coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled. In addition to conventional acquisitions in standard planes, subjects underwent one additional left coronary artery (LCA) or right coronary artery (RCA) rotational (spin) acquisition using a predefined trajectory. Radiation exposure and contrast volume were recorded for each run. Seventy-five subjects were enrolled. When compared with standard five-view cine acquisition, LCA spin angiography with one cranial and one caudal run resulted in 34.38% +/- 13.65% less radiation, 18.98% +/- 4.97% less contrast, and comparable assessment of stenosis severity. One spin acquisition compared with three standard cine acquisitions for RCA angiography resulted in 59.31% +/- 29.07% lower radiation, no significant change in contrast, and comparable assessment of stenosis severity. Rotational X-ray coronary angiography provides comparable visualization of coronary anatomy compared with traditional nonrotational coronary angiography with significantly less radiation exposure and contrast volume. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15390246     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  7 in total

Review 1.  Coronary angiography in the angioplasty era: projections with a meaning.

Authors:  Carlo Di Mario; Nilesh Sutaria
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment.

Authors:  Zhi-Geng Jin; Zhuo-Qi Zhang; Li-Min Jing; Yu-Jie Wei; Jiao Zhang; Jian-Ping Luo; Sheng-Li Yang; Dong-Xing Ma; Ying Liu; Wei Han; Yong Yang; Hui-Liang Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Three-dimensional rotational angiography of a patient with pulmonary atresia intact septum and coronary fistulas.

Authors:  J Panzer; Y Taeymans; D De Wolf
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  A comparison of radiation dose between standard and 3D angiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  João Luiz Langer Manica; Mônica Scott Borges; Rogério Fachel de Medeiros; Leandro dos Santos Fischer; Gabriel Broetto; Raul Ivo Rossi Filho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography.

Authors:  Zhi-Geng Jin; Rui Bai; Yi Li; Yong Yang; Wei Han; Qing Zhao; Lu Zhang; Hui-Liang Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  When is rotational angiography superior to conventional single-plane angiography for planning coronary angioplasty?

Authors:  Paul D Morris; Jane Taylor; Sara Boutong; Sarah Brett; Amal Louis; James Heppenstall; Allison C Morton; Julian P Gunn
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Guidance of interventions in structural heart disease; three-dimensional techniques are here to stay.

Authors:  M Voskuil; H Sievert; F Arslan
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.380

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.