| Literature DB >> 27729043 |
Jangsup Moon1,2, Do-Yong Kim1, Jung-Ick Byun1,3, Jun-Sang Sunwoo1,4, Jung-Ah Lim1,2, Tae-Joon Kim1,2, Jung-Won Shin5, Woo-Jin Lee1,2, Han Sang Lee1,2, Jin-Sun Jun1,2, Kyung-Il Park6, Keun-Hwa Jung1,2, Soon-Tae Lee1,2, Ki-Young Jung1,2, Kon Chu7,8, Sang Kun Lee9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with postural tachycardia syndrome often appear depressive and report diminished quality of life (QOL). In the current study, we first evaluated if the maximal heart rate (HR) increment after standing is associated with the clinical symptoms in patients with excessive orthostatic tachycardia (OT). Next, we investigated the correlations among the symptoms of orthostatic intolerance (OI), depression, and health-related QOL in these patients. Finally we assessed if patients with minimal OI symptoms suffer from depression or diminished QOL.Entities:
Keywords: Correlation; Depression; Orthostatic intolerance; Postural tachycardia syndrome; Quality of life
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27729043 PMCID: PMC5059908 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0548-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Clinical characteristics of the patients
| OIQ Total Score | Gender, F(%) | Age | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI | Max HR Increment | BDI-II | PCS | MCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total ( | 67 (62.6%) | 31.1 ± 1.3 | 166.3 ± 0.9 | 62.2 ± 1.3 | 22.3 ± 0.3 | 42.8 ± 1.2 | 14.8 ± 0.8 | 43.4 ± 0.8 | 39.9 ± 1.1 |
| 0–4 ( | 7 (43.8%) | 23.6 ± 3.0 | 169.2 ± 2.3 | 63.7 ± 2.8 | 22.2 ± 0.7 | 46.4 ± 3.0 | 7.4 ± 1.0 | 49.6 ± 2.2 | 46.9 ± 2.6 |
| 5–9 ( | 9 (60%) | 30.5 ± 2.4 | 168.8 ± 2.6 | 65.4 ± 3.9 | 22.7 ± 0.9 | 38.9 ± 3.0 | 10.2 ± 1.6 | 49.0 ± 1.7 | 45.4 ± 2.1 |
| 10–14 ( | 13 (61.9%) | 34.7 ± 4.0 | 168.5 ± 2.5 | 64.2 ± 3.6 | 22.4 ± 0.8 | 45.9 ± 2.9 | 13.3 ± 1.9 | 42.4 ± 1.3 | 41.0 ± 2.1 |
| 15–19 ( | 16 (64%) | 32.2 ± 2.3 | 165.2 ± 1.9 | 62.2 ± 3.1 | 22.6 ± 0.8 | 43.2 ± 2.8 | 17.2 ± 1.6 | 42.2 ± 1.3 | 38.8 ± 1.8 |
| 20–24 ( | 14 (82.4%) | 33.1 ± 2.3 | 161.5 ± 1.6 | 58.4 ± 2.4 | 22.4 ± 0.8 | 37.2 ± 1.5 | 19.1 ± 2.0 | 40.7 ± 1.5 | 35.9 ± 1.9 |
| 25–29 ( | 4 (100%) | 25.3 ± 3.2 | 160.1 ± 4.5 | 55.2 ± 4.9 | 21.4 ± 1.1 | 42.0 ± 4.6 | 21.8 ± 2.8 | 39.3 ± 3.7 | 29.7 ± 2.0 |
| 30–34 ( | 3 (50%) | 32.5 ± 6.3 | 167.8 ± 3.6 | 60.7 ± 4.3 | 21.5 ± 1.2 | 47.7 ± 3.9 | 21.5 ± 3.5 | 36.9 ± 2.2 | 30.1 ± 8.3 |
| 35–39 ( | 1 (33.3%) | 33.7 ± 8.8 | 164.9 ± 4.2 | 57.1 ± 5.4 | 20.9 ± 1.2 | 40.0 ± 6.2 | 21.0 ± 4.9 | 32.3 ± 6.7 | 33.5 ± 10.1 |
|
| 0.047 | 0.211 | 0.81 | 0.984 | 0.1 | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
The values are the mean ± SEM. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the mean among the subgroups
Abbreviations: OIQ orthostatic intolerance questionnaire, F female, BMI body-mass index, HR heart rate, BDI-II Beck depression inventory-II, PCS physical component summary scale of Short Form 36, MCS mental component summary scale of Short Form 36
* p < 0.01
Correlations among the questionnaire parameters
| ( | OIQ Total | BDI-II | PCS | MCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OIQ Total Score |
|
|
| |
| 1. Nausea |
| −.379** | −.209* | |
| 2. Tremor in hands | .325** | −.157 | −.176 | |
| 3. Dizziness | .272** |
| −.307** | |
| 4. Palpitation |
| −.390** | −.283** | |
| 5. Headache | .224* |
| −.262** | |
| 6. Profuse perspiration | .272** | −.213* | −.096 | |
| 7. Blurred vision | .339** | −.249** | −.248* | |
| 8. Chest discomfort |
| −.348** | −.399** | |
| 9. Lightheadedness |
|
| −.335** | |
| 10. Concentration difficulties |
|
|
| |
| Max HR increase | −.081 | −.032 | .123 | .083 |
Spearman’s correlation coefficient was performed for all patients (n = 107). The values represent the Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient
Abbreviations: OIQ orthostatic intolerance questionnaire, BDI-II Beck depression inventory-II, PCS physical component summary scale of Short Form 36, MCS mental component summary scale of Short Form 36
** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, Bold: stronger correlation
Fig. 1Correlation analyses between orthostatic intolerance symptoms and other questionnaire parameters. a The total orthostatic intolerance questionnaire (OIQ) score showed a significant positive linear correlation with the Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) score (p < 0.001). b, c The total OIQ score displayed a significant inverse linear correlation with the physical component summary scale (PCS) and the mental component summary scale (MCS) of the 36 Item Short-Form Health Survey (p < 0.001). r represents a measure of goodness-of-fit of linear regression
Fig. 2Mean values of BDI-II, PCS and MCS scores in subgroups categorized by total OIQ score. All patients were subcategorized according to total OIQ scores at intervals of 5 points. The mean BDI-II score in each group shows a tendency to increase as the OIQ score increases. The mean PCS and MCS values display a tendency to decrease as the total OIQ score decreases
Multivariate analysis for a significant functional deterioration
| ( | Depression | Diminished physical QOL | Diminished mental QOL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI |
| OR | 95 % CI |
| OR | 95 % CI |
| |
| Total OIQ score a | |||||||||
| OIQ scores 0–9 | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| OIQ scores 10–19 | 6.190 | 2.021–18.958 | 0.001* | 3.103 | 0.748–12.883 | 0.119 | 4.686 | 1.583–13.882 | 0.005* |
| OIQ scores ≥20 | 14.300 | 4.083–50.078 | <0.001* | 13.144 | 3.037–56.891 | 0.001* | 10.392 | 3.071–35.163 | <0.001* |
| OIQ score items b | |||||||||
| Nausea | 2.501 | 1.631–3.834 | <0.001* | ||||||
| Chest discomfort | 1.717 | 1.130–2.610 | 0.011* | ||||||
| Concentration difficulties | 1.470 | 1.027–2.104 | 0.035* | 1.756 | 1.290–2.389 | <0.001* | |||
Abbreviations: OIQ orthostatic intolerance questionnaire, QOL quality of life
a Ordinal regression analysis was performed. Basic demographics (age, sex, body mass index, maximal HR increment) and total OIQ scores were analyzed
b Logistic regression analysis was performed. Basic demographics (age, sex, body mass index, maximal HR increment) and OIQ items with P < 0.1 were analyzed using the backward Wald elimination method (cutoff P ≥ 0.05). The final OIQ items remained in the models are displayed
*p < 0.05
Mean score of the OIQ items in each subgroup
| ( | OIQ score | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–4 | 5–9 | 10–14 | 15–19 | 20–24 | 25–29 | 30–34 | 35–39 | Total | |
| 1. Nausea | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| 2. Tremor in hands | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| 3. Dizziness |
|
|
|
|
| 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 0.2 |
|
|
| 4. Palpitation | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 3.5 ± 0.2 |
| 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| 5. Headache |
|
|
|
| 2.8 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.5 |
| 3.7 ± 0.3 |
|
| 6. Profuse perspiration | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| 7. Blurred vision | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 2.5 ± 0.6 |
| 1.2 ± 0.1 |
| 8. Chest discomfort | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.2 |
| 1.3 ± 0.1 |
| 9. Lightheadedness | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.2 |
|
| 3.8 ± 0.2 |
| 1.9 ± 0.1 |
| 10. Concentration difficulties | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
|
| 3.7 ± 0.3 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| OIQ total | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 11.3 ± 0.3 | 17.3 ± 0.3 | 21.2 ± 0.3 | 26.8 ± 1.0 | 32.3 ± 0.8 | 37.0 ± 1.0 | 14.9 ± 0.9 |
The values are demonstrated as the mean ± SEM
The two most common symptoms in each group are displayed in bold characters
Fig. 3Symptoms self-reported by patients subcategorized according to total OIQ score. All patients were subcategorized according to total OIQ scores at intervals of 5 points. Each point of the decagonal scale represents the mean score of each symptom in the designated subgroup. For example, in the subgroup of patients with total OIQ score between 15 and 19 (purple line), the mean score of Nausea, Tremor in hands, Dizziness, and Palpitation was 1.3, 0.7, 2.8, and 1.8, respectively. Dizziness and headache were the two most common symptoms complained of by patients with an OIQ score < 20. As the OIQ score increased, patients tended to complain more about lightheadedness, concentration difficulties and palpitation. Profuse perspiration was the least reported patient complaint