| Literature DB >> 27724874 |
Božo Frajman1, Ivana Rešetnik2, Marjan Niketić3, Friedrich Ehrendorfer4, Peter Schönswetter1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polyploidy is one of the most important evolutionary pathways in flowering plants and has significantly contributed to their diversification and radiation. Due to the prevalence of reticulate evolution spanning three ploidy levels, Knautia is considered one of the taxonomically most intricate groups in the European flora. On the basis of ITS and plastid DNA sequences as well as AFLP fingerprints obtained from 381 populations of almost all species of the genus we asked the following questions. (1) Where and when did the initial diversification in Knautia take place, and how did it proceed further? (2) Did Knautia undergo a similarly recent (Pliocene/Pleistocene) rapid radiation as other genera with similar ecology and overlapping distribution? (3) Did polyploids evolve within the previously recognised diploid groups or rather from hybridisation between groups?Entities:
Keywords: Estimation of divergence times; Genetic versus traditional species groups; Haplotype sharing; Hybridisation; Knautia; Polyploidy; Random walk analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27724874 PMCID: PMC5057222 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0773-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Sampled populations of 51 species of Knautia sect. Trichera. Population identifiers, which correspond to Additional file 1: Table S1, are underlined for tetraploid populations and white with black shading for hexaploid populations. Diploid populations are not highlighted. a distribution of diploid and polyploid taxa outside of the area enlarged in B and C; b distribution of diploid taxa modified from Rešetnik et al. [24]; c distribution of polyploid taxa. Taxa of the exclusively diploid sections Knautia and Tricheroides are not shown
Fig. 2Plastid DNA variation in populations of 51 species of Knautia sect. Trichera based on petN(ycf6)-psbM sequences. a statistical parsimony network of the 97 plastid haplotypes encountered; numbering corresponds to Additional file 1: Table S1 (the numbers 1–57 correspond to diploid accessions from Rešetnik et al. [24]); the size of the circles is proportional to the square-root transformed frequency of the respective haplotype; haplotypes not sampled are shown as small black dots. Only haplotypes retrieved from at least two individuals as well as those mentioned in the text are labelled separately. Haplotypes present in diploids are identified by a black outline. b–d geographic distribution of haplotypes. Symbols for the species are as in Fig. 1; their colour filling corresponds to the haplotype groups shown in a. The grey lines in b delimit three areas for which separate NeighbourNets of AFLP relationships complemented with plastid haplotypes are given in Figures S7–S9 within the Additional file 8
Matrix and phylogenetic analysis statistics for ITS and the plastid marker petN(ycf6)-psbM as well as substitution models proposed by MrAIC and used in the Bayesian analyses
| ITS |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Number of terminals | 278 | 274 |
| Number of included characters | 948 | 1444 |
| Number / percentage of parsimony informative characters | 192 / 20.3 % | 103 / 7.1 % |
| Number of MP trees | 17,635 | 52 |
| Length of MP trees | 539 | 244 |
| Consistency index (CI; excluding uninformative characters) | 0.646 (0.585) | 0.881 (0.797) |
| Retention index (RI) | 0.923 | 0.956 |
| Substitution model | HKY + Γ | GTR + Γ |
Fig. 3Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) variation in Knautia sect. Trichera illustrating dispersion of cytotypes over the network. Relationships are visualised as NeighbourNet diagram based on uncorrected P distances; a fully labelled version is presented in Additional file 4: Figure S3
Fig. 4Bayesian consensus chronogram of the concatenated ITS and plastid datasets obtained with BEAST. Numbers above branches are PP values >0.50 (they were omitted within the crown groups of section Trichera), numbers in bold associated with nodes indicate the mean crown group age in millions of years of the clade diversifying at that node and the bars correspond to the 95 % highest posterior densities of the age estimates. Population identifiers correspond to Additional file 1: Table S1. The insert shows a lineage-through-time plot displaying the dynamics of diversification of Knautia. The black line represents the MCC tree from the BEAST analysis and the grey lines represent the interval resulting from all sampled trees after burnin
Fig. 5Snapshots of estimated ancestral node areas in the Maximum Clade Credibility tree (obtained with BEAST) of combined ITS and plastid datasets of Knautia at different time horizons as visualised using the software SPREAD. The starting point of diversification is indicated with an asterisk in the upper left figure, the 80 % highest posterior density areas for nodes are indicated as grey polygons, and the time scale of diversification is indicated in million years before present in the upper right corner in each panel. Distribution of land in the corresponding periods is indicated by green polygons in the two upper and the left middle panels (from Rögl [81]: Figs. 8 and 12 for the two upper panels, and from Meulenkamp and Sissingh [85]: Fig. 7 for the left middle panel). The coloured lines show the diversification of Knautia sections: black, section Trichera; yellow, section Knautia; red, section Tricheroides. The distribution of K. sect. Trichera is indicated by a dashed line in the right lower panel
Diversification rates (birth–death) in species per Myr in Knautia sect. Trichera assuming 50 species, following the method of Magallón and Sanderson [65] and using 95 % highest posterior density intervals of the age estimates from BEAST analysis of a dataset pruned to Knautia. ε, extinction rate
| Clade | Diversification rate |
|---|---|
| crown group, ε = 0 | 0.42–2.87 |
| crown group, ε = 0.9 | 0.23–1.54 |
| stem group, ε = 0 | 0.22–0.74 |
| stem group, ε = 0.9 | 0.10–0.33 |
Fig. 6Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) variation in 251 populations of 51 species of Knautia sect. Trichera. Relationships are visualised as NeighbourNet diagram based on uncorrected P distances. Dots at the tips of branches indicate ploidy levels: white, diploid; grey, tetraploid; black, hexaploid. The colours of individual branches indicate the ten genetic clusters identified as optimal solution by K-means clustering. Nine groups, whose circumscription was additionally informed by the clustering of diploid accessions [24] and the topology of the NeighbourNet, are indicated by thick black lines. Species assigned to more than one cluster are highlighted with dots, whose colours reflect all clusters a species is assigned to. An enlargeable version of Fig. 6 with labelling of terminal splits is presented as Additional file 7: Figure S6
Comparison of the species groups within Knautia sect. Trichera proposed by us with those of Ehrendorfer [21, 30]. Information in squared brackets refers to accessions of the same species belonging to different AFLP groups. The addition “p.p.” after a species’ name indicates that the species is included in more than one AFLP groups. Distributions of individual species are characterised based on floras as well as on the author’s field observations
| AFLP groups and constituent species | Groups recognised by Ehrendorfer (1962a, 1981) | Ploidy levels of AFLP groups and constituent species | Habitat preference of individual species | Distribution type of AFLP groups and distribution of individual species | Morphological characteristics of AFLP groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| 2 | grasslands and ruderal places | SE Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
| 2 | grasslands and ruderal places | most of Europe except for the extreme south | |
|
|
| 2 | forests | S Italy | |
|
|
| 2 | grasslands and ruderal places | Central Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
| 2 | grasslands and ruderal places | Central and W Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| [2 | grasslands and ruderal places | most of Europe except for the extreme south | |
|
|
| 2 | natural grasslands and rock cervices, limestone | Austria (E Central Alps) | |
|
|
| 4 | forest margins, tall herb communities, meadows | Central Europe [Alps, Central Balkan Peninsula] | |
|
| 4 | meadows, wood margins | Central Europe | ||
|
|
| 4 | grassy forest understory, rocks | Austria (E Alps) | |
|
| 2 | alpine rock pastures | W Krkonoše (Czech Republic) | ||
|
| 2 | serpentine forest clearings and edges | NW Czech Republic | ||
|
| 2 | natural grasslands on limestone | central E Slovakia | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| 2 | (sub) alpine meadows, tall herb communities | Central and W Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
| 2 | (sub) alpine meadows, tall herb communities | Central and W Balkan Peninsula; S Italy | |
|
|
| 4 | rocky forest clearings | Central Balkan Peninsula [Alps, Central Europe] | |
|
|
| 2 | forest and forest margins | Central and SE Europe, N Italy | |
|
|
| 4 | forest margins | Central Balkan Peninsula | |
|
| 4 | serpentine clearings | Central Balkan Peninsula | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| [4 | forests, forest margins, tall herb communities | Alps [Central Europe, Central Balkan Peninsula] | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| 4 | subalpine meadows | N Italy | |
|
|
| 4 | thermophilous shrubland | Slovenia | |
|
|
| 2 | meadows, pastures, open forests | SE Alps to NW Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
| 2 | upper montane to alpine meadows and tall herb communities | S and E Alps, S and E Carpathians | |
|
|
| 2 | damp mountain meadows | Zlatibor planina (Serbia) | |
|
|
| 4 | stabilised limestone screes | N Italy | |
|
|
| 2 | meadows | SW and S Europe | |
|
|
| 6 | forest margins | N Italy | |
|
|
| 2 | screes, pastures, forest edges | S Alps | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 4 | subalpine grasslands, pastures | E central Balkan Peninsula | ||
|
|
| 2 | tall herb communities, rocky pastures | E central Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| 2 | subalpine meadows | Anatolia to Caucasus | |
|
|
| 2 | tall herb communities | Caucasus to Urals | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| 4 | forest margins, wet meadows | Massif Central (France) | |
|
|
| 2 | (sub) alpine grasslands on volcanic bedrock | Massif Central (France) | |
|
| 4 | dwarf shrub-communities | |||
|
|
| 2 | wet meadows, fens | Massif Central (France) to Jura Mountains (Switzerland) | |
|
|
| 2 | tall herb communities, open forests | Eastern Pyrenees | |
|
| 4 | meadows | N Iberian Peninsula | ||
|
|
| 4 | tall herb communities, road margins, silicate | Iberian Peninsula | |
|
| 4 | montane meadows, limestone screes | E Iberian Peninsula | ||
|
|
| 2 | tall herb communities, (sub) alpine meadows | Western Alps | |
|
| 2 | grassy and rocky slopes | Iberian Peninsula | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 4 | rocky limestone slopes, calcareous hillsides, scrub margins | Dalmatia (Croatia) | ||
|
|
| 2 | dry grasslands | Central W Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
| 2 | grasslands and ruderal places | most of Europe except for the extreme south | |
|
|
| 2 | mountain grasslands | Central and S Italy, Sicily | |
|
|
| 4 | dry grasslands | Dalmatia (Croatia) | |
|
|
| 2 | dry grasslands and subruderal places | S France and NW Italy? | |
|
|
| 4 | rocky limestone slopes, calcareous hillsides, scrub margines | Dalmatia (Croatia) | |
|
|
| 2 | dry grasslands | SE Alps to NW Balkan Peninsula | |
|
|
| 2 | mountain grasslands | SW Alps | |
|
|
| 2 | dry mountain grasslands | NW Balkan Peninsula (Velebit) | |
|
|
| 2 | dry grasslands and ruderal places | SW and S Europe | |
|
| 6 | upper montane meadows | NW Balkan Peninsula (S Velebit) | ||
|
|
| 2 | dry mountain grasslands | Central NW Balkan Peninsula | |
|
| K. | 2 | dry mountain grasslands | NW Balkan Peninsula (Velebit) |