| Literature DB >> 27723825 |
Benjamin D Menze1,2, Jacob M Riveron1,2, Sulaiman S Ibrahim1,3, Helen Irving1, Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio2, Parfait H Awono-Ambene2, Charles S Wondji1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the recent progress in establishing the patterns of insecticide resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles funestus, Central African populations of this species remain largely uncharacterised. To bridge this important gap and facilitate the implementation of suitable control strategies against this vector, we characterised the resistance patterns of An. funestus population from northern Cameroon. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27723825 PMCID: PMC5056689 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Susceptibility status of the An. funestus population from Gounougou in 2012; A) Mortality rates after 1hr exposure to insecticides; B) Mortality rate after PBO synergist assay.
Error-bars represent the standard error (n = 4).
Fig 2Susceptibility status of the An. funestus population from Gounougou in 2015.
Error-bars represent the standard error (n = 4).
Summary statistics for polymorphism in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in susceptible and resistant An. funestus from Gounougou.
N, number of sequences (2n); S, number of polymorphic sites; h, number of haplotypes (haplotype diversity); π, nucleotide diversity (k = mean number of nucleotide differences); D and D*, Tajima’s and Fu and Li’s statistics; ns, not significant
| Samples | N | S | π (k) | h (hd) | Syn | Nonsyn | D | D* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 16 | 0.0054(5.0) | 9(0.98) | 0 | 2(I877L, V881L) | -0.52ns | -0.42ns | |
| 10 | 17 | 0.0049(4.5) | 8(0.93) | 2 | 1(A1007S) | -1.14ns | -0.99ns | |
| 20 | 33 | 0.0052(4.8) | 16(0.95) | 2 | 3 | -1.43ns | -1.42ns | |
| 10 | 14 | 0.0053(4.87) | 9(0.978) | 0 | 1(A1007S) | -0.38ns | -0.03ns | |
| 10 | 14 | 0.0043(4.00) | 9(0.978) | 0 | 0 | -0.89ns | -0.96ns | |
| 20 | 28 | 0.0048(4.48) | 16(0.97) | 0 | 1 | -1.18ns | -1.22ns | |
| 40 | 38 | 0.0051(4.7) | 28(0.98) | 2 | 3 | -1.71ns | -2.48ns | |
Fig 3Analysis of the polymorphism of the voltage gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene: A) Sequencing traces showing the A877L and V881L mutations whereas B) shows the A1007S mutation. C) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of VGSC fragment showing a lack of association between haplotypes and resistance phenotype to permethrin. B) is for DDT. R and S in the haplotype names stand for resistant and susceptible respectively.
Fig 4Temporal distribution of resistance markers in Gounougou.
A) Frequency of the three genotypes of the L119F-GSTe2 conferring DDT resistance between 2006, 2012 and 2015; B) is for A296S-RDL mutation conferring dieldrin resistance.