| Literature DB >> 27876039 |
Rousseau J Djouaka1, Seun M Atoyebi2,3, Genevieve M Tchigossou2,4, Jacob M Riveron5, Helen Irving5, Romaric Akoton2,4, Michael O Kusimo2, Adekunle A Bakare3, Charles S Wondji5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowing the extent and spread of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors is vital to successfully manage insecticide resistance in Africa. This information in the main malaria vector, Anopheles funestus sensu stricto, is completely lacking in the most populous country in Africa, Nigeria. This study reports the insecticide susceptibility status and the molecular basis of resistance of An. funestus as well as its involvement in malaria transmission in Akaka-Remo, a farm settlement village in southwest Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles funestus; Insecticide resistance; Malaria control; Nigeria; Resistance mechanisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27876039 PMCID: PMC5120565 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1615-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Seasonal density of An. funestus per room at Akaka-Remo. m/r mosquitoes per room
Plasmodium infection rates of An. funestus from Akaka-Remo
| Locality | Species Id | F0 tested | +ve | +ve | +ve | Total infected with TaqMan (% infection) | Total infected with nested PCR (% infection) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akaka-Remo |
| 93 | 6 | 1 | – | 7 (8) | 4 (4) |
fal falciparum, OVM the combination of ovale, vivax and malariae
Fig. 2Insecticide resistance profiles of An. funestus s.s. from Akaka-Remo. Error bars represent standard error of the mean
Fig. 3Insecticide resistance profiles of An. funestus after exposure to PBO. Error bars represent standard error of the mean; Control 1 Mosquitoes that were neither exposed to PBO nor insecticides; Control 2 Mosquitoes that were exposed to only PBO
Fig. 4Screening of L119F-GSTe2 mutation (a) shows a high presence of RR and RS individuals and a low presence of SS in F0 females An. funestus from Akaka-remo. b F1 An. funestus s.s. from Akaka-Remo showing high presence of RR and RS and a relatively low presence of SS individuals in both the resistant (alive) and susceptible (dead) individuals post DDT exposure
Fig. 5Genotype distribution of A296S-RDL mutation (a) showing a significant presence of RR and RS individuals in the F0 population of An. funestus from Akaka Remo (b) F1 An. funestus s.s. from Akaka-Remo post dieldrin exposure showing high presence of RR individuals in resistant (alive) and the absence of RR and low presence of RS in susceptible (dead) individuals