Literature DB >> 27708117

Deflection Analysis of Different Needle Designs for Prostate Biopsy and Focal Therapy.

Nelson N Stone1, Vladimir Mouraviev2, David Schechter3, Josh Goetz3, M Scott Lucia4, E Erin Smith5, E David Crawford5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The biopsy needles currently used were designed for a transrectal biopsy and are known to experience significant deflection from the point of entry into the gland to the needle tip.
METHODS: Five designs were selected for testing: 18-gauge Bard, 15-gauge lancet tip needle with 12° vet-point cannula, and trocar tip needle with 12°, 15°, and 20° vet-point cannulas. The 15-gauge needle was designed to take a variable specimen sample between 20 and 60 mm, whereas the Bard needle specimen bed was fixed at 20 mm. The needles were bench tested on a spring-loaded platform and fired into gelatin matrix with modulus of elasticity similar to human prostate.
RESULTS: The Bard device with lancet tip needle deflected an average of 0.9 mm (range 0.3-1.3 mm) and 1.9° (range 0.6°-2.8°). Increasing needle diameter from 18-gauge Bard to 15-gauge variable with the same lancet tip needle design resulted in an average deflection across the 3 test lengths of 0.9 mm (range 0-2.0 mm) and 0.9° (range 0°-2.0°) with no significant difference. On the contrary, the use of the 3-point trocar tip needles with 12°, 15°, and 20° vet-point cannulas demonstrated significant reduction in the extent of deflection in both millimeters and degrees. There was no deflection at the 2- and 4-cm shots for both spring loads and preloads for the 3 vet tip angles tested. At 6 cm, the 20° vet tip performed the best.
CONCLUSION: We proposed a mechanism that provides more accurate prostate sampling by combining a 3-point trocar tip on the needle with a 20° vet tip on the cutting cannula. Using the phantom, mimicking prostate gland tissue density, no deflection was revealed between 20- and 60-mm biopsy lengths, which should permit a straight sample in the majority of prostate glands and improve cancer localization for focal therapy planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deflection of biopsy needles; prostate cancer; transperineal template-mapping biopsy; transrectal ultrasound; trocar tip needle

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27708117      PMCID: PMC5665157          DOI: 10.1177/1533034616671007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  15 in total

1.  Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Jonathan A Coleman; Sarah Crane; Mark Emberton; Larry Goldenberg; Hedvig Hricak; Mike W Kattan; John Kurhanewicz; Caroline M Moore; Chris Parker; Thomas J Polascik; Peter Scardino; Nicholas van As; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue.

Authors:  Allison M Okamura; Christina Simone; Mark D O'Leary
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study.

Authors:  Philip Blumenfeld; Nobuhiko Hata; Simon DiMaio; Kelly Zou; Steven Haker; Gabor Fichtinger; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Improving accuracy in image-guided prostate biopsy by using trocar-sharpened needles.

Authors:  Timur H Kuru; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Matthias Roethke; Markus Hohenfellner; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Optimizing prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Y Bostanci; A Kazzazi; B Djavan
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.720

6.  Clinical-pathologic correlation between transperineal mapping biopsies of the prostate and three-dimensional reconstruction of prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Kyle O Rove; Al B Barqawi; Paul D Maroni; Priya N Werahera; Craig A Baer; Hari K Koul; Cory A Rove; M Scott Lucia; Francisco G La Rosa
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Trocar-sharpened needles for image-guided prostate biopsy improve sample quality and performance: first clinical results.

Authors:  Tobias Simpfendörfer; Timur H Kuru; Sarah Steinemann; Claudia Bergsträsser; Svenja Block; Wilfried Roth; Matthias C Roethke; Markus Hohenfellner; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Optimal prostate biopsy regimen.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Prostate needle biopsy: what we do and what should be improved.

Authors:  Filippo Fraggetta; Pietro Pepe; Giuseppina Improta; Francesco Aragona; Maurizio Colecchia
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Biopsy strategies for selecting patients for focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Abi Kanthabalan; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.309

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer?

Authors:  Samuel A Gold; Graham R Hale; Jonathan B Bloom; Clayton P Smith; Kareem N Rayn; Vladimir Valera; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Automatic segmentation of prostate and extracapsular structures in MRI to predict needle deflection in percutaneous prostate intervention.

Authors:  Franklin King; Nobuhiko Hata; Satoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Needle deflection and tissue sampling length in needle biopsy.

Authors:  Annie D R Li; Jeffrey Plott; Lei Chen; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Albert Shih
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-01-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.