Literature DB >> 32174391

Needle deflection and tissue sampling length in needle biopsy.

Annie D R Li1, Jeffrey Plott2, Lei Chen3, Jeffrey S Montgomery4, Albert Shih5.   

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of needle tip geometry on the needle deflection and tissue sampling length in biopsy. Advances in medical imaging have allowed the identification of suspicious cancerous lesions which then require needle biopsy for tissue sampling and subsequent confirmatory pathological analysis. Precise needle insertion and adequate tissue sampling are essential for accurate cancer diagnosis and individualized treatment decisions. However, the single-bevel needles in current hand-held biopsy devices often deflect significantly during needle insertion, causing variance in the targeted and actual locations of the sampled tissue. This variance can lead to inaccurate sampling and false-negative results. There is also a limited understanding of factors affecting the tissue sampling length which is a critical component of accurate cancer diagnosis. This study compares the needle deflection and tissue sampling length between the existing single-bevel and exploratory multi-bevel needle tip geometries. A coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element analysis was applied to understand the needle-tissue interaction during needle insertion. The needle deflection and tissue sampling length were experimentally studied using tissue-mimicking phantoms and ex-vivo tissue, respectively. This study reveals that the tissue separation location at the needle tip affects both needle deflection and tissue sampling length. By varying the tissue separation location and creating a multi-bevel needle tip geometry, the bending moments induced by the insertion forces can be altered to reduce the needle deflection. However, the tissue separation location also affects the tissue contact inside the needle groove, potentially reducing the tissue sampling length. A multi-bevel needle tip geometry with the tissue separation point below the needle groove face may reduce the needle deflection while maintaining a long tissue sampling length. Results from this study can guide needle tip design to enable the precise needle deployment and adequate tissue sampling for the needle biopsy procedures.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Needle biopsy; Needle deflection; Needle insertion; Needle tip geometry; Tissue sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32174391      PMCID: PMC7078072          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  38 in total

1.  MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies.

Authors:  Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Matthias P Lichy; Udo Nagele; Markus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Joerg Hennenlotter; Stefan Corvin; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Needle insertion into soft tissue: a survey.

Authors:  Niki Abolhassani; Rajni Patel; Mehrdad Moallem
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Needle deflection estimation: prostate brachytherapy phantom experiments.

Authors:  Hossein Sadjadi; Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.

Authors:  Akhil Muthigi; Arvin K George; Abhinav Sidana; Michael Kongnyuy; Richard Simon; Vanessa Moreno; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Neil Mendhiratta; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Xiaosong Meng; James S Wysock; Michael Fenstermaker; Richard Huang; Fang-Ming Deng; Jonathan Melamed; Ming Zhou; William C Huang; Herbert Lepor; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Alberto Briganti; Pieter De Visschere; Mark Emberton; Gianluca Giannarini; Alex Kirkham; Samir S Taneja; Harriet Thoeny; Geert Villeirs; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Richard Memo; Carl R Schaub
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.657

9.  Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Mary Lou Jondal; Jonathan Clain; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Leonard Marks; Shelena Young; Shyam Natarajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more
  3 in total

1.  Automatic segmentation of prostate and extracapsular structures in MRI to predict needle deflection in percutaneous prostate intervention.

Authors:  Franklin King; Nobuhiko Hata; Satoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Multi-Bevel Needle Design Enabling Accurate Insertion in Biopsy for Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Annie D R Li; Yang Liu; Jeffrey Plott; Lei Chen; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Albert Shih
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Electrochemotherapy treatment safety under parallel needle deflection.

Authors:  Daniella L L S Andrade; Raul Guedert; Guilherme B Pintarelli; Marcelo M M Rangel; Krishna D Oliveira; Priscila G Quadros; Daniela O H Suzuki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.