Mike Wu1, Marzyeh Ghassemi2, Mengling Feng2, Leo A Celi2, Peter Szolovits2, Finale Doshi-Velez3. 1. Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The widespread adoption of electronic health records allows us to ask evidence-based questions about the need for and benefits of specific clinical interventions in critical-care settings across large populations. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prediction of vasopressor administration and weaning in the intensive care unit. Vasopressors are commonly used to control hypotension, and changes in timing and dosage can have a large impact on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered a cohort of 15 695 intensive care unit patients without orders for reduced care who were alive 30 days post-discharge. A switching-state autoregressive model (SSAM) was trained to predict the multidimensional physiological time series of patients before, during, and after vasopressor administration. The latent states from the SSAM were used as predictors of vasopressor administration and weaning. RESULTS: The unsupervised SSAM features were able to predict patient vasopressor administration and successful patient weaning. Features derived from the SSAM achieved areas under the receiver operating curve of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.71 for predicting ungapped vasopressor administration, gapped vasopressor administration, and vasopressor weaning, respectively. We also demonstrated many cases where our model predicted weaning well in advance of a successful wean. CONCLUSION: Models that used SSAM features increased performance on both predictive tasks. These improvements may reflect an underlying, and ultimately predictive, latent state detectable from the physiological time series.
BACKGROUND: The widespread adoption of electronic health records allows us to ask evidence-based questions about the need for and benefits of specific clinical interventions in critical-care settings across large populations. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prediction of vasopressor administration and weaning in the intensive care unit. Vasopressors are commonly used to control hypotension, and changes in timing and dosage can have a large impact on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered a cohort of 15 695 intensive care unit patients without orders for reduced care who were alive 30 days post-discharge. A switching-state autoregressive model (SSAM) was trained to predict the multidimensional physiological time series of patients before, during, and after vasopressor administration. The latent states from the SSAM were used as predictors of vasopressor administration and weaning. RESULTS: The unsupervised SSAM features were able to predict patient vasopressor administration and successful patient weaning. Features derived from the SSAM achieved areas under the receiver operating curve of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.71 for predicting ungapped vasopressor administration, gapped vasopressor administration, and vasopressor weaning, respectively. We also demonstrated many cases where our model predicted weaning well in advance of a successful wean. CONCLUSION: Models that used SSAM features increased performance on both predictive tasks. These improvements may reflect an underlying, and ultimately predictive, latent state detectable from the physiological time series.
Authors: Kristel J M Janssen; A Rogier T Donders; Frank E Harrell; Yvonne Vergouwe; Qingxia Chen; Diederick E Grobbee; Karel G M Moons Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J R Le Gall; P Loirat; A Alperovitch; P Glaser; C Granthil; D Mathieu; P Mercier; R Thomas; D Villers Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1984-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Patrick Biston; Jacques Devriendt; Christian Madl; Didier Chochrad; Cesar Aldecoa; Alexandre Brasseur; Pierre Defrance; Philippe Gottignies; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marzyeh Ghassemi; Tristan Naumann; Peter Schulam; Andrew L Beam; Irene Y Chen; Rajesh Ranganath Journal: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Date: 2020-05-30
Authors: Stephanie L Hyland; Martin Faltys; Matthias Hüser; Xinrui Lyu; Thomas Gumbsch; Cristóbal Esteban; Christian Bock; Max Horn; Michael Moor; Bastian Rieck; Marc Zimmermann; Dean Bodenham; Karsten Borgwardt; Gunnar Rätsch; Tobias M Merz Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jessica M Schwartz; Amanda J Moy; Sarah C Rossetti; Noémie Elhadad; Kenrick D Cato Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Joost D J Plate; Rutger R van de Leur; Luke P H Leenen; Falco Hietbrink; Linda M Peelen; M J C Eijkemans Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2019-10-26 Impact factor: 4.615