Literature DB >> 33936436

Predicting Volume Responsiveness Among Sepsis Patients Using Clinical Data and Continuous Physiological Waveforms.

Rishikesan Kamaleswaran1, Jiaoying Lian2, Dong-Lien Lin2, Himasagar Molakapuri2, SriManikanth Nunna2, Parth Shah2, Shiv Dua3, Rema Padman2.   

Abstract

The efficacy of early fluid treatment in patients with sepsis is unclear and may contribute to serious adverse events due to fluid non-responsiveness. The current method of deciding if patients are responsive to fluid administration is often subjective and requires manual intervention. This study utilizes MIMIC III and associated matched waveform datasets across the entire ICU stay duration of each patient to develop prediction models for assessing fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients. We developed a pipeline to extract high frequency continuous waveform data and included waveform features in the prediction models. Comparing across five machine learning models, random forest performed the best when no waveform information is added (AUC = 0.84), with mean arterial blood pressure and age identified as key factors. After incorporation of features from physiologic waveforms, logistic regression with L1 penalty provided consistent performance and high interpretability, achieving an accuracy of 0.89 and F1 score of 0.90. ©2020 AMIA - All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIMIC III; Sepsis; fluid responsiveness prediction; machine learning; waveform data

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33936436      PMCID: PMC8075451     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  25 in total

1.  Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?

Authors:  Melissa J Azur; Elizabeth A Stuart; Constantine Frangakis; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  John H Boyd; Jason Forbes; Taka-aki Nakada; Keith R Walley; James A Russell
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Improving Sepsis Treatment Strategies by Combining Deep and Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Xuefeng Peng; Yi Ding; David Wihl; Omer Gottesman; Matthieu Komorowski; Li-Wei H Lehman; Andrew Ross; Aldo Faisal; Finale Doshi-Velez
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

5.  Applying Artificial Intelligence to Identify Physiomarkers Predicting Severe Sepsis in the PICU.

Authors:  Rishikesan Kamaleswaran; Oguz Akbilgic; Madhura A Hallman; Alina N West; Robert L Davis; Samir H Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 6.  Clinical review: a review and analysis of heart rate variability and the diagnosis and prognosis of infection.

Authors:  Saif Ahmad; Anjali Tejuja; Kimberley D Newman; Ryan Zarychanski; Andrew Je Seely
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.

Authors:  Matthieu Komorowski; Leo A Celi; Omar Badawi; Anthony C Gordon; A Aldo Faisal
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity.

Authors:  Bouchra Lamia; Ana Ochagavia; Xavier Monnet; Denis Chemla; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Steven W Thiel; Marin H Kollef; Warren Isakow
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold.

Authors:  Ivaylo I Christov
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies.

Authors:  Hong-Fei Deng; Ming-Wei Sun; Yu Wang; Jun Zeng; Ting Yuan; Ting Li; Di-Huan Li; Wei Chen; Ping Zhou; Qi Wang; Hua Jiang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.