Literature DB >> 31732944

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Use After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Nicole Christian1, Emily C Zabor2, Michael Cassidy1, Jessica Flynn2, Monica Morrow1, Mary L Gemignani3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer increases breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates, but many women opt for mastectomy with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Here we evaluate factors associated with CPM use in women undergoing mastectomy post-NAC.
METHODS: A retrospective institutional NAC database review identified women with clinical stage I-III, unilateral invasive breast cancer undergoing unilateral mastectomy (UM) or CPM mastectomy from 9/2013 to 12/2017. Clinical/pathologic characteristics, imaging, and presence of contraindications to BCS post-NAC were compared, with subset analysis of BCS candidates. The multivariable analysis was adjusted for potential confounders.
RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-nine women underwent mastectomy after NAC, 297 (52%) UM and 272 (48%) CPM. On univariable analysis, younger age, BRCA+, lower pre-NAC clinical stage, pathologic complete response, and axillary surgery extent were associated with CPM (all p < 0.01). Favorable post-NAC clinical factors of no residual palpable disease, clinically negative nodes, complete response on breast imaging, and no post-NAC contraindication to BCS were also associated with CPM (all p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, young age (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.95), lower pre-NAC stage (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77), and no contraindication to BCS (OR 3.12, 95% CI 2.02-4.82) were significantly associated with CPM. Among the 203 (35%) women who had no contraindications to BCS post-NAC, 145 (71%) underwent CPM. BRCA+ and family history were reasons more frequently cited for mastectomy among CPM than UM (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: CPM was performed in 48% of women undergoing mastectomy after NAC; younger women with earlier-stage cancers were more likely to undergo CPM. While increased use of CPM in women with more favorable disease is medically appropriate, our findings indicate a lost opportunity for use of BCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31732944      PMCID: PMC7004848          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08038-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  26 in total

1.  The Shifting Paradigm for Breast Cancer Surgery in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Gaurav Ajmani; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Avisek Datta; Katharine Yao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): survival outcomes of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial and their association with pathological complete response.

Authors:  Evandro de Azambuja; Andrew P Holmes; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Eileen Holmes; Serena Di Cosimo; Ramona F Swaby; Michael Untch; Christian Jackisch; Istvan Lang; Ian Smith; Frances Boyle; Binghe Xu; Carlos H Barrios; Edith A Perez; Hatem A Azim; Sung-Bae Kim; Sherko Kuemmel; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Peter Vuylsteke; Ruey-Kuen Hsieh; Vera Gorbunova; Alexandru Eniu; Lydia Dreosti; Natalia Tavartkiladze; Richard D Gelber; Holger Eidtmann; José Baselga
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  E A Peralta; J D Ellenhorn; L D Wagman; A Dagis; J S Andersen; D Z Chu
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Rita Sakr; Sujata Patil; Inga Gurevich; Michelle Stempel; Michelle Sampson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III triple negative breast cancer on eligibility for breast-conserving surgery and breast conservation rates: surgical results from CALGB 40603 (Alliance).

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Constance T Cirrincione; William M Sikov; Donald A Berry; Sara Jasinski; Tracey F Weisberg; George Somlo; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; David W Ollila
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Survival outcomes after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Pamela R Portschy; Karen M Kuntz; Todd M Tuttle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Susan G Fisher; Bahman Emami
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The Optimal Treatment Plan to Avoid Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Differs by Surgical Strategy and Tumor Subtype.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Emily C Zabor; Anita Mamtani; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J S D Mieog; J A van der Hage; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

10.  The Manchester guidelines for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy.

Authors:  Narendra Nath Basu; G L Ross; D G Evans; L Barr
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer: what to discuss with patients.

Authors:  Giacomo Montagna; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.512

2.  ASO Author Reflections: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer May Not Alter Increasing Trends for CPM Utilization.

Authors:  Nicole Christian; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Oncologic outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction in young women with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Wu; Hee Jeong Kim; Jongwon Lee; Il Yong Chung; Jisun Kim; Sae Byul Lee; Byung-Ho Son; Eun Key Kim; Jae Ho Jeong; Hee Jin Lee; Eun Young Chae; Jinhong Jung; Sei-Hyun Ahn; BeomSeok Ko
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: An Advanced Personalized Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation Model (APMP-M) to Optimize Outcomes.

Authors:  Alba Di Leone; Daniela Terribile; Stefano Magno; Alejandro Martin Sanchez; Lorenzo Scardina; Elena Jane Mason; Sabatino D'Archi; Claudia Maggiore; Cristina Rossi; Annalisa Di Micco; Stefania Carnevale; Ida Paris; Fabio Marazzi; Valeria Masiello; Armando Orlandi; Antonella Palazzo; Alessandra Fabi; Riccardo Masetti; Gianluca Franceschini
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-21

5.  How Often Does Modern Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Downstage Patients to Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Authors:  Oriana Petruolo; Varadan Sevilimedu; Giacomo Montagna; Tiana Le; Monica Morrow; Andrea V Barrio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.