Larissa A Korde1, Mark R Somerfield2, Lisa A Carey3, Jennie R Crews4, Neelima Denduluri5, E Shelley Hwang6, Seema A Khan7, Sibylle Loibl8, Elizabeth A Morris9, Alejandra Perez10, Meredith M Regan11, Patricia A Spears3, Preeti K Sudheendra12, W Fraser Symmans13, Rachel L Yung4, Brittany E Harvey2, Dawn L Hershman14. 1. Clinical Investigations Branch, CTEP, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA. 3. University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA. 5. US Oncology Network, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Arlington, VA. 6. Duke University, Durham, NC. 7. Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 8. German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany. 9. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 10. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Plantation, FL. 11. Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 12. MD Anderson Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ. 13. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 14. Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options. RESULTS: A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
PURPOSE: To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options. RESULTS: A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Authors: Sara M Tolaney; Hao Guo; Sonia Pernas; William T Barry; Deborah A Dillon; Lauren Ritterhouse; Bryan P Schneider; Fei Shen; Kit Fuhrman; Michele Baltay; Chau T Dang; Denise A Yardley; Beverly Moy; P Kelly Marcom; Kathy S Albain; Hope S Rugo; Mathew J Ellis; Iuliana Shapira; Antonio C Wolff; Lisa A Carey; Beth Overmoyer; Ann H Partridge; Clifford A Hudis; Ian E Krop; Harold J Burstein; Eric P Winer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Courtney Tyne; Douglas W Blayney; Diane Blum; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sara A Hurvitz; Miguel Martin; W Fraser Symmans; Kyung Hae Jung; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Alastair M Thompson; Nadia Harbeck; Vicente Valero; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Hans Wildiers; Mario Campone; Jean-François Boileau; Matthias W Beckmann; Karen Afenjar; Rodrigo Fresco; Hans-Joachim Helms; Jin Xu; Yvonne G Lin; Joseph Sparano; Dennis Slamon Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jessica M Pastoriza; George S Karagiannis; Juan Lin; Sonali Lanjewar; David Entenberg; John S Condeelis; Joseph A Sparano; Xiaonan Xue; Thomas E Rohan; Maja H Oktay Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Douglas W Blayney; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Julie M Vose; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Fisher; A Brown; E Mamounas; S Wieand; A Robidoux; R G Margolese; A B Cruz; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; N Wolmark; A DeCillis; J L Hoehn; A W Lees; N V Dimitrov Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Günther G Steger; Arik Galid; Michael Gnant; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Alois Lang; Christoph Tausch; Margaretha Rudas; Richard Greil; Catharina Wenzel; Christian F Singer; Anton Haid; Sabine Pöstlberger; Hellmut Samonigg; Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth; Werner Kwasny; Eduard Klug; Ernst Kubista; Christian Menzel; Raimund Jakesz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Prabhani U Atukorale; Taylor J Moon; Alexandr R Bokatch; Christina F Lusi; Jackson T Routhier; Victoria J Deng; Efstathios Karathanasis Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Haeyoung Kim; Yeon Jeong Kim; Donghyun Park; Woong-Yang Park; Doo Ho Choi; Won Park; Won Kyung Cho; Nalee Kim Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Javier I J Orozco; Shu-Ching Chang; Diego M Marzese; Janie G Grumley; Chikako Matsuba; Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez; Gary L Grunkemeier Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Valentino Martelli; Maria Maddalena Latocca; Tommaso Ruelle; Marta Perachino; Luca Arecco; Kristi Beshiri; Maria Grazia Razeti; Marco Tagliamento; Maurizio Cosso; Piero Fregatti; Matteo Lambertini Journal: Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Date: 2021-05-24