Literature DB >> 27701777

Modeling complexes of modeled proteins.

Ivan Anishchenko1, Petras J Kundrotas1, Ilya A Vakser1,2.   

Abstract

Structural characterization of proteins is essential for understanding life processes at the molecular level. However, only a fraction of known proteins have experimentally determined structures. This fraction is even smaller for protein-protein complexes. Thus, structural modeling of protein-protein interactions (docking) primarily has to rely on modeled structures of the individual proteins, which typically are less accurate than the experimentally determined ones. Such "double" modeling is the Grand Challenge of structural reconstruction of the interactome. Yet it remains so far largely untested in a systematic way. We present a comprehensive validation of template-based and free docking on a set of 165 complexes, where each protein model has six levels of structural accuracy, from 1 to 6 Å Cα RMSD. Many template-based docking predictions fall into acceptable quality category, according to the CAPRI criteria, even for highly inaccurate proteins (5-6 Å RMSD), although the number of such models (and, consequently, the docking success rate) drops significantly for models with RMSD > 4 Å. The results show that the existing docking methodologies can be successfully applied to protein models with a broad range of structural accuracy, and the template-based docking is much less sensitive to inaccuracies of protein models than the free docking. Proteins 2017; 85:470-478.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interactome; protein docking; protein modeling; protein recognition; structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27701777      PMCID: PMC5313347          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  43 in total

1.  Docking of protein models.

Authors:  Andrei Tovchigrechko; Christopher A Wells; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

3.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques.

Authors:  E Katchalski-Katzir; I Shariv; M Eisenstein; A A Friesem; C Aflalo; I A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Joël Janin; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Protein-protein alternative binding modes do not overlap.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes.

Authors:  Thomas A Hopf; Charlotta P I Schärfe; João P G L M Rodrigues; Anna G Green; Oliver Kohlbacher; Chris Sander; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Debora S Marks
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Accuracy of functional surfaces on comparatively modeled protein structures.

Authors:  Jieling Zhao; Joe Dundas; Sema Kachalo; Zheng Ouyang; Jie Liang
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2011-05-04

8.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Text Mining for Protein Docking.

Authors:  Varsha D Badal; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Predicted binding site information improves model ranking in protein docking using experimental and computer-generated target structures.

Authors:  Surabhi Maheshwari; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2015-11-23
View more
  14 in total

1.  Gene ontology improves template selection in comparative protein docking.

Authors:  Anna Hadarovich; Ivan Anishchenko; Alexander V Tuzikov; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2018-12-27

2.  Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins.

Authors:  Amar Singh; Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Michael J E Sternberg; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-20

4.  How to choose templates for modeling of protein complexes: Insights from benchmarking template-based docking.

Authors:  Devlina Chakravarty; G W McElfresh; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-02-07

Review 5.  Computational approaches to macromolecular interactions in the cell.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser; Eric J Deeds
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Modeling CAPRI targets 110-120 by template-based and free docking using contact potential and combined scoring function.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ivan Anishchenko; Varsha D Badal; Madhurima Das; Taras Dauzhenka; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-09-28

7.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIII.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-23

8.  Computational Feasibility of an Exhaustive Search of Side-Chain Conformations in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions.

Authors:  Burcu Ozden; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Ezgi Karaca
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 10.  Methods for sequence and structural analysis of B and T cell receptor repertoires.

Authors:  Shunsuke Teraguchi; Dianita S Saputri; Mara Anais Llamas-Covarrubias; Ana Davila; Diego Diez; Sedat Aybars Nazlica; John Rozewicki; Hendra S Ismanto; Jan Wilamowski; Jiaqi Xie; Zichang Xu; Martin de Jesus Loza-Lopez; Floris J van Eerden; Songling Li; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 7.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.