Literature DB >> 34337786

Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions.

Burcu Ozden1,2, Andriy Kryshtafovych3, Ezgi Karaca1,2.   

Abstract

In CASP14, 39 research groups submitted more than 2500 3D models on 22 protein complexes. In general, the community performed well in predicting the fold of the assemblies (for 80% of the targets), although it faced significant challenges in reproducing the native contacts. This is especially the case for the complexes without whole-assembly templates. The leading predictor, BAKER-experimental, used a methodology combining classical techniques (template-based modeling, protein docking) with deep learning-based contact predictions and a fold-and-dock approach. The Venclovas team achieved the runner-up position with template-based modeling and docking. By analyzing the target interfaces, we showed that the complexes with depleted charged contacts or dominating hydrophobic interactions were the most challenging ones to predict. We also demonstrated that if AlphaFold2 predictions were at hand, the interface prediction challenge could be alleviated for most of the targets. All in all, it is evident that new approaches are needed for the accurate prediction of assemblies, which undoubtedly will expand on the significant improvements in the tertiary structure prediction field.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; contact prediction; protein assembly; quaternary structure prediction; template-based modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34337786      PMCID: PMC9109697          DOI: 10.1002/prot.26199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  44 in total

1.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

2.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?

Authors:  Jinrui Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  High-resolution protein-protein docking by global optimization: recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Hasup Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER.

Authors:  Benjamin Webb; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-20

5.  Blind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: The CASP13-CAPRI experiment.

Authors:  Marc F Lensink; Guillaume Brysbaert; Nurul Nadzirin; Sameer Velankar; Raphaël A G Chaleil; Tereza Gerguri; Paul A Bates; Elodie Laine; Alessandra Carbone; Sergei Grudinin; Ren Kong; Ran-Ran Liu; Xi-Ming Xu; Hang Shi; Shan Chang; Miriam Eisenstein; Agnieszka Karczynska; Cezary Czaplewski; Emilia Lubecka; Agnieszka Lipska; Paweł Krupa; Magdalena Mozolewska; Łukasz Golon; Sergey Samsonov; Adam Liwo; Silvia Crivelli; Guillaume Pagès; Mikhail Karasikov; Maria Kadukova; Yumeng Yan; Sheng-You Huang; Mireia Rosell; Luis A Rodríguez-Lumbreras; Miguel Romero-Durana; Lucía Díaz-Bueno; Juan Fernandez-Recio; Charles Christoffer; Genki Terashi; Woong-Hee Shin; Tunde Aderinwale; Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subraman; Daisuke Kihara; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda; Kathryn Porter; Dzmitry Padhorny; Israel Desta; Dmitri Beglov; Mikhail Ignatov; Sergey Kotelnikov; Iain H Moal; David W Ritchie; Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne; Bernard Maigret; Marie-Dominique Devignes; Maria E Ruiz Echartea; Didier Barradas-Bautista; Zhen Cao; Luigi Cavallo; Romina Oliva; Yue Cao; Yang Shen; Minkyung Baek; Taeyong Park; Hyeonuk Woo; Chaok Seok; Merav Braitbard; Lirane Bitton; Dina Scheidman-Duhovny; Justas Dapkūnas; Kliment Olechnovič; Česlovas Venclovas; Petras J Kundrotas; Saveliy Belkin; Devlina Chakravarty; Varsha D Badal; Ilya A Vakser; Thom Vreven; Sweta Vangaveti; Tyler Borrman; Zhiping Weng; Johnathan D Guest; Ragul Gowthaman; Brian G Pierce; Xianjin Xu; Rui Duan; Liming Qiu; Jie Hou; Benjamin Ryan Merideth; Zhiwei Ma; Jianlin Cheng; Xiaoqin Zou; Panagiotis I Koukos; Jorge Roel-Touris; Francesco Ambrosetti; Cunliang Geng; Jörg Schaarschmidt; Mikael E Trellet; Adrien S J Melquiond; Li Xue; Brian Jiménez-García; Charlotte W van Noort; Rodrigo V Honorato; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-25

6.  Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information.

Authors:  Sergey Ovchinnikov; Hetunandan Kamisetty; David Baker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Automated evaluation of quaternary structures from protein crystals.

Authors:  Spencer Bliven; Aleix Lafita; Althea Parker; Guido Capitani; Jose M Duarte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Limits and potential of combined folding and docking.

Authors:  Gabriele Pozzati; Wensi Zhu; Claudio Bassot; John Lamb; Petras Kundrotas; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests.

Authors:  Valerio Mariani; Marco Biasini; Alessandro Barbato; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.

Authors:  John Jumper; Richard Evans; Alexander Pritzel; Tim Green; Michael Figurnov; Olaf Ronneberger; Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool; Russ Bates; Augustin Žídek; Anna Potapenko; Alex Bridgland; Clemens Meyer; Simon A A Kohl; Andrew J Ballard; Andrew Cowie; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Stanislav Nikolov; Rishub Jain; Demis Hassabis; Jonas Adler; Trevor Back; Stig Petersen; David Reiman; Ellen Clancy; Michal Zielinski; Martin Steinegger; Michalina Pacholska; Tamas Berghammer; Sebastian Bodenstein; David Silver; Oriol Vinyals; Andrew W Senior; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Pushmeet Kohli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Davi Nakajima An; Jerry M Parks; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-07

3.  Cryo-EM targets in CASP14.

Authors:  Tristan Cragnolini; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Maya Topf
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-09-16

4.  The Structure of the Arabidopsis PEX4-PEX22 Peroxin Complex-Insights Into Ubiquitination at the Peroxisomal Membrane.

Authors:  Melissa S Traver; Sarah E Bradford; Jose Luis Olmos; Zachary J Wright; Mitchell D Miller; Weijun Xu; George N Phillips; Bonnie Bartel
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Target highlights in CASP14: Analysis of models by structure providers.

Authors:  Leila T Alexander; Rosalba Lepore; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Athanassios Adamopoulos; Markus Alahuhta; Ann M Arvin; Yannick J Bomble; Bettina Böttcher; Cécile Breyton; Valerio Chiarini; Naga Babu Chinnam; Wah Chiu; Krzysztof Fidelis; Rhys Grinter; Gagan D Gupta; Marcus D Hartmann; Christopher S Hayes; Tatjana Heidebrecht; Andrea Ilari; Andrzej Joachimiak; Youngchang Kim; Romain Linares; Andrew L Lovering; Vladimir V Lunin; Andrei N Lupas; Cihan Makbul; Karolina Michalska; John Moult; Prasun K Mukherjee; William Sam Nutt; Stefan L Oliver; Anastassis Perrakis; Lucy Stols; John A Tainer; Maya Topf; Susan E Tsutakawa; Mauricio Valdivia-Delgado; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-10

Review 6.  Modeling the Dynamics of Protein-Protein Interfaces, How and Why?

Authors:  Ezgi Karaca; Chantal Prévost; Sophie Sacquin-Mora
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.