Literature DB >> 22645367

Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins.

Petras J Kundrotas1, Zhengwei Zhu, Joël Janin, Ilya A Vakser.   

Abstract

Traditional approaches to protein-protein docking sample the binding modes with no regard to similar experimentally determined structures (templates) of protein-protein complexes. Emerging template-based docking approaches utilize such similar complexes to determine the docking predictions. The docking problem assumes the knowledge of the participating proteins' structures. Thus, it provides the possibility of aligning the structures of the proteins and the template complexes. The progress in the development of template-based docking and the vast experience in template-based modeling of individual proteins show that, generally, such approaches are more reliable than the free modeling. The key aspect of this modeling paradigm is the availability of the templates. The current common perception is that due to the difficulties in experimental structure determination of protein-protein complexes, the pool of docking templates is insignificant, and thus a broad application of template-based docking is possible only at some future time. The results of our large scale, systematic study show that, surprisingly, in spite of the limited number of protein-protein complexes in the Protein Data Bank, docking templates can be found for complexes representing almost all the known protein-protein interactions, provided the components themselves have a known structure or can be homology-built. About one-third of the templates are of good quality when they are compared to experimental structures in test sets extracted from the Protein Data Bank and would be useful starting points in modeling the complexes. This finding dramatically expands our ability to model protein interactions, and has far-reaching implications for the protein docking field in general.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22645367      PMCID: PMC3386081          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200678109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; Zhexin Xiang; Christopher L Tang; Lei Xie; Marina Gimpelev; Therese Mitros; Cinque S Soto; Sharon Goldsmith-Fischman; Andrew Kernytsky; Avner Schlessinger; Ingrid Y Y Koh; Emil Alexov; Barry Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

2.  The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update.

Authors:  Lukasz Salwinski; Christopher S Miller; Adam J Smith; Frank K Pettit; James U Bowie; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; Ryan Brenke; Stephen R Comeau; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-01

Review 4.  Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.

Authors:  S F Altschul; T L Madden; A A Schäffer; J Zhang; Z Zhang; W Miller; D J Lipman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins.

Authors:  S B Needleman; C D Wunsch
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices.

Authors:  S Henikoff; J G Henikoff
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-09

8.  An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences.

Authors:  O Gotoh
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database and related tools 2005 update.

Authors:  C Alfarano; C E Andrade; K Anthony; N Bahroos; M Bajec; K Bantoft; D Betel; B Bobechko; K Boutilier; E Burgess; K Buzadzija; R Cavero; C D'Abreo; I Donaldson; D Dorairajoo; M J Dumontier; M R Dumontier; V Earles; R Farrall; H Feldman; E Garderman; Y Gong; R Gonzaga; V Grytsan; E Gryz; V Gu; E Haldorsen; A Halupa; R Haw; A Hrvojic; L Hurrell; R Isserlin; F Jack; F Juma; A Khan; T Kon; S Konopinsky; V Le; E Lee; S Ling; M Magidin; J Moniakis; J Montojo; S Moore; B Muskat; I Ng; J P Paraiso; B Parker; G Pintilie; R Pirone; J J Salama; S Sgro; T Shan; Y Shu; J Siew; D Skinner; K Snyder; R Stasiuk; D Strumpf; B Tuekam; S Tao; Z Wang; M White; R Willis; C Wolting; S Wong; A Wrong; C Xin; R Yao; B Yates; S Zhang; K Zheng; T Pawson; B F F Ouellette; C W V Hogue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  81 in total

1.  Assessment of ligand binding site predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Tiziano Gallo Cassarino; Lorenza Bordoli; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

2.  Evaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Howook Hwang; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Protein-protein alternative binding modes do not overlap.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Structural templates for modeling homodimers.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser; Joël Janin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Global and local structural similarity in protein-protein complexes: implications for template-based docking.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

6.  Extending RosettaDock with water, sugar, and pH for prediction of complex structures and affinities for CAPRI rounds 20-27.

Authors:  Krishna Praneeth Kilambi; Michael S Pacella; Jianqing Xu; Jason W Labonte; Justin R Porter; Pravin Muthu; Kevin Drew; Daisuke Kuroda; Ora Schueler-Furman; Richard Bonneau; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

Review 7.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Integrating ab initio and template-based algorithms for protein-protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Sweta Vangaveti; Thom Vreven; Yang Zhang; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Structural templates for comparative protein docking.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Alexander V Tuzikov; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-06-13

10.  Modeling CAPRI targets 110-120 by template-based and free docking using contact potential and combined scoring function.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ivan Anishchenko; Varsha D Badal; Madhurima Das; Taras Dauzhenka; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.