Literature DB >> 21541664

Accuracy of functional surfaces on comparatively modeled protein structures.

Jieling Zhao1, Joe Dundas, Sema Kachalo, Zheng Ouyang, Jie Liang.   

Abstract

Identification and characterization of protein functional surfaces are important for predicting protein function, understanding enzyme mechanism, and docking small compounds to proteins. As the rapid speed of accumulation of protein sequence information far exceeds that of structures, constructing accurate models of protein functional surfaces and identify their key elements become increasingly important. A promising approach is to build comparative models from sequences using known structural templates such as those obtained from structural genome projects. Here we assess how well this approach works in modeling binding surfaces. By systematically building three-dimensional comparative models of proteins using MODELLER: , we determine how well functional surfaces can be accurately reproduced. We use an alpha shape based pocket algorithm to compute all pockets on the modeled structures, and conduct a large-scale computation of similarity measurements (pocket RMSD and fraction of functional atoms captured) for 26,590 modeled enzyme protein structures. Overall, we find that when the sequence fragment of the binding surfaces has more than 45% identity to that of the template protein, the modeled surfaces have on average an RMSD of 0.5 Å, and contain 48% or more of the binding surface atoms, with nearly all of the important atoms in the signatures of binding pockets captured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541664      PMCID: PMC3415962          DOI: 10.1007/s10969-011-9109-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics        ISSN: 1345-711X


  60 in total

Review 1.  Protein-protein interaction in insulin signaling and the molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance.

Authors:  A Virkamäki; K Ueki; C R Kahn
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites.

Authors:  Gail J Bartlett; Craig T Porter; Neera Borkakoti; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Predicting protein function from sequence and structure.

Authors:  David Lee; Oliver Redfern; Christine Orengo
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?

Authors:  David Eramian; Narayanan Eswar; Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; C Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology.

Authors:  R B Russell; P D Sasieni; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Cytochrome P450 diversity and induction by gorgonian allelochemicals in the marine gastropod Cyphoma gibbosum.

Authors:  Kristen E Whalen; Victoria R Starczak; David R Nelson; Jared V Goldstone; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection.

Authors:  Vincent Le Guilloux; Peter Schmidtke; Pierre Tuffery
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modeling complexes of modeled proteins.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 2.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Accurate protein function prediction via graph attention networks with predicted structure information.

Authors:  Boqiao Lai; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Inhibition of protein interactions: co-crystalized protein-protein interfaces are nearly as good as holo proteins in rigid-body ligand docking.

Authors:  Saveliy Belkin; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Modeling regionalized volumetric differences in protein-ligand binding cavities.

Authors:  Brian Y Chen; Soutir Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  CASTp 3.0: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Chang Chen; Xue Lei; Jieling Zhao; Jie Liang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.