Audrey Perrotin1, Renaud La Joie2, Vincent de La Sayette3, Louisa Barré4, Florence Mézenge1, Justine Mutlu1, Denis Guilloteau5, Stéphanie Egret1, Francis Eustache1, Gaël Chételat1. 1. INSERM, U1077, Caen, France; Université de Caen Normandie, UMR-S1077, Caen, France; Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, UMR-S1077, Caen, France; CHU de Caen, U1077, Caen, France. 2. INSERM, U1077, Caen, France; Université de Caen Normandie, UMR-S1077, Caen, France; Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, UMR-S1077, Caen, France; CHU de Caen, U1077, Caen, France. Electronic address: lajoie@cyceron.fr. 3. INSERM, U1077, Caen, France; Université de Caen Normandie, UMR-S1077, Caen, France; Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, UMR-S1077, Caen, France; CHU de Caen, Service de Neurologie, Caen, France. 4. Université de Caen Normandie, UMR-S1077, Caen, France; CEA, DRF/I2BM, LDM-TEP Group, Caen, France; CNRS, UMR ISTCT 6301, LDM-TEP Group, Caen, France. 5. INSERM U930, Université François Rabelais de Tours, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) could indicate preclinical Alzheimer's disease, but the existing literature is confounded by heterogeneous approaches to studying SCD. We assessed the differential cognitive, affective, and neuroimaging correlates of two aspects of SCD: reporting high cognitive difficulties on a self-rated questionnaire versus consulting at a memory clinic. METHODS: We compared 28 patients from a memory clinic with isolated SCD, 35 community-recruited elders with similarly high levels of self-reported cognitive difficulties, and 35 community-recruited controls with low self-reported cognitive difficulties. RESULTS: Increased anxiety and amyloid β deposition were observed in both groups with high self-reported difficulties, whereas subclinical depression and (hippocampal) atrophy were specifically associated with medical help seeking. Cognitive tests showed no group differences. DISCUSSION: These results further validate the concept of SCD in both community- and clinic-based groups. Yet, recruitment methods influence associated biomarkers and affective symptomatology, highlighting the heterogeneous nature of SCD depending on study characteristics.
INTRODUCTION: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) could indicate preclinical Alzheimer's disease, but the existing literature is confounded by heterogeneous approaches to studying SCD. We assessed the differential cognitive, affective, and neuroimaging correlates of two aspects of SCD: reporting high cognitive difficulties on a self-rated questionnaire versus consulting at a memory clinic. METHODS: We compared 28 patients from a memory clinic with isolated SCD, 35 community-recruited elders with similarly high levels of self-reported cognitive difficulties, and 35 community-recruited controls with low self-reported cognitive difficulties. RESULTS: Increased anxiety and amyloid β deposition were observed in both groups with high self-reported difficulties, whereas subclinical depression and (hippocampal) atrophy were specifically associated with medical help seeking. Cognitive tests showed no group differences. DISCUSSION: These results further validate the concept of SCD in both community- and clinic-based groups. Yet, recruitment methods influence associated biomarkers and affective symptomatology, highlighting the heterogeneous nature of SCD depending on study characteristics.
Authors: Rosalinde E R Slot; Sietske A M Sikkes; Johannes Berkhof; Henry Brodaty; Rachel Buckley; Enrica Cavedo; Efthimios Dardiotis; Francoise Guillo-Benarous; Harald Hampel; Nicole A Kochan; Simone Lista; Tobias Luck; Paul Maruff; José Luis Molinuevo; Johannes Kornhuber; Barry Reisberg; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Shannon L Risacher; Susanne Roehr; Perminder S Sachdev; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Philip Scheltens; Melanie B Shulman; Andrew J Saykin; Sander C J Verfaillie; Pieter Jelle Visser; Stephanie J B Vos; Michael Wagner; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Frank Jessen; Wiesje M van der Flier Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Mariella Lauriola; Roberto Esposito; Stefano Delli Pizzi; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Francesco Londrillo; Joel H Kramer; Gil D Rabinovici; Armando Tartaro Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Ian M McDonough; Graham J McDougall; Michael LaRocca; Safiya G Dalmida; Kristopher L Arheart Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2019-04-07 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Piotr Lewczuk; Peter Riederer; Sid E O'Bryant; Marcel M Verbeek; Bruno Dubois; Pieter Jelle Visser; Kurt A Jellinger; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Alfredo Ramirez; Lucilla Parnetti; Clifford R Jack; Charlotte E Teunissen; Harald Hampel; Alberto Lleó; Frank Jessen; Lidia Glodzik; Mony J de Leon; Anne M Fagan; José Luis Molinuevo; Willemijn J Jansen; Bengt Winblad; Leslie M Shaw; Ulf Andreasson; Markus Otto; Brit Mollenhauer; Jens Wiltfang; Martin R Turner; Inga Zerr; Ron Handels; Alexander G Thompson; Gunilla Johansson; Natalia Ermann; John Q Trojanowski; Ilker Karaca; Holger Wagner; Patrick Oeckl; Linda van Waalwijk van Doorn; Maria Bjerke; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; H Bea Kuiperij; Lucia Farotti; Yi Li; Brian A Gordon; Stéphane Epelbaum; Stephanie J B Vos; Catharina J M Klijn; William E Van Nostrand; Carolina Minguillon; Matthias Schmitz; Carla Gallo; Andrea Lopez Mato; Florence Thibaut; Simone Lista; Daniel Alcolea; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Johannes Kornhuber Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Jacob W Vogel; Monika Varga Doležalová; Renaud La Joie; Shawn M Marks; Henry D Schwimmer; Susan M Landau; William J Jagust Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Frank Jessen; Rebecca E Amariglio; Rachel F Buckley; Wiesje M van der Flier; Ying Han; José Luis Molinuevo; Laura Rabin; Dorene M Rentz; Octavio Rodriguez-Gomez; Andrew J Saykin; Sietske A M Sikkes; Colette M Smart; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Michael Wagner Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jason D Flatt; Julene K Johnson; Stephen E Karpiak; Liz Seidel; Britta Larson; Mark Brennan-Ing Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472