| Literature DB >> 29076399 |
Piotr Lewczuk1,2, Peter Riederer3, Sid E O'Bryant4, Marcel M Verbeek5,6, Bruno Dubois7, Pieter Jelle Visser8,9, Kurt A Jellinger10, Sebastiaan Engelborghs11,12, Alfredo Ramirez13,14,15, Lucilla Parnetti16, Clifford R Jack17, Charlotte E Teunissen18, Harald Hampel19, Alberto Lleó20,21, Frank Jessen15,22, Lidia Glodzik23, Mony J de Leon23, Anne M Fagan24,25, José Luis Molinuevo26,27, Willemijn J Jansen8, Bengt Winblad28, Leslie M Shaw29, Ulf Andreasson30,31, Markus Otto32, Brit Mollenhauer33, Jens Wiltfang34,35,36, Martin R Turner37, Inga Zerr35,38, Ron Handels8,28, Alexander G Thompson37, Gunilla Johansson28, Natalia Ermann1, John Q Trojanowski29, Ilker Karaca13, Holger Wagner13, Patrick Oeckl32, Linda van Waalwijk van Doorn5,6, Maria Bjerke11, Dimitrios Kapogiannis39, H Bea Kuiperij5,6, Lucia Farotti16, Yi Li23, Brian A Gordon24,40, Stéphane Epelbaum7, Stephanie J B Vos8, Catharina J M Klijn5, William E Van Nostrand41, Carolina Minguillon26, Matthias Schmitz35,38, Carla Gallo42, Andrea Lopez Mato43, Florence Thibaut44, Simone Lista19, Daniel Alcolea20,21, Henrik Zetterberg30,31,45, Kaj Blennow30, Johannes Kornhuber1.
Abstract
In the 12 years since the publication of the first Consensus Paper of the WFSBP on biomarkers of neurodegenerative dementias, enormous advancement has taken place in the field, and the Task Force takes now the opportunity to extend and update the original paper. New concepts of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the conceptual interactions between AD and dementia due to AD were developed, resulting in two sets for diagnostic/research criteria. Procedures for pre-analytical sample handling, biobanking, analyses and post-analytical interpretation of the results were intensively studied and optimised. A global quality control project was introduced to evaluate and monitor the inter-centre variability in measurements with the goal of harmonisation of results. Contexts of use and how to approach candidate biomarkers in biological specimens other than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), e.g. blood, were precisely defined. Important development was achieved in neuroimaging techniques, including studies comparing amyloid-β positron emission tomography results to fluid-based modalities. Similarly, development in research laboratory technologies, such as ultra-sensitive methods, raises our hopes to further improve analytical and diagnostic accuracy of classic and novel candidate biomarkers. Synergistically, advancement in clinical trials of anti-dementia therapies energises and motivates the efforts to find and optimise the most reliable early diagnostic modalities. Finally, the first studies were published addressing the potential of cost-effectiveness of the biomarkers-based diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; consensus; dementia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29076399 PMCID: PMC5916324 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2017.1375556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry ISSN: 1562-2975 Impact factor: 4.132