| Literature DB >> 27690076 |
Sarah P Loughran1,2, Md Shahriar Al Hossain3, Alan Bentvelzen4,5, Mark Elwood6,7, John Finnie8,9, Joseph Horvat10, Steve Iskra11,12,13, Elena P Ivanova14,15, Jim Manavis16, Chathuranga Keerawella Mudiyanselage17,18, Alireza Lajevardipour19,20, Boris Martinac21,22, Robert McIntosh23,24,25, Raymond McKenzie26,27, Mislav Mustapic28, Yoshitaka Nakayama29, Elena Pirogova30,31, M Harunur Rashid32, Nigel A Taylor33,34, Nevena Todorova35,36, Peter M Wiedemann37, Robert Vink38,39, Andrew Wood40,41, Irene Yarovsky42,43, Rodney J Croft44,45.
Abstract
Mobile phone subscriptions continue to increase across the world, with the electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by these devices, as well as by related technologies such as Wi-Fi and smart meters, now ubiquitous. This increase in use and consequent exposure to mobile communication (MC)-related EMF has led to concern about possible health effects that could arise from this exposure. Although much research has been conducted since the introduction of these technologies, uncertainty about the impact on health remains. The Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research (ACEBR) is a National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence that is undertaking research addressing the most important aspects of the MC-EMF health debate, with a strong focus on mechanisms, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and exposure dosimetry. This research takes as its starting point the current scientific status quo, but also addresses the adequacy of the evidence for the status quo. Risk communication research complements the above, and aims to ensure that whatever is found, it is communicated effectively and appropriately. This paper provides a summary of this ACEBR research (both completed and ongoing), and discusses the rationale for conducting it in light of the prevailing science.Entities:
Keywords: EMF; RF bioeffects; bioelectromagnetics; research
Year: 2016 PMID: 27690076 PMCID: PMC5086706 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13100967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The effect of static magnetic field (SMF) on the gating of the M42C mechanosensitive channels of large conductance (MscL) labelled with paramagnetic nanoparticles coated with sulfhydryl (SH) groups. (A) 3D crystallographic structure of MscL viewed from the side (left) and the top (right). Red spheres show the methionine 42 residue of each subunit, which is replaced with a cysteine used for labelling in this study; (B) patch-clamp chamber with a ring-shaped magnet (left) and SMF application protocol (right); (C) patch-clamp recording from M42C MscL (upper trace) upon application of a pressure ramp (lower trace) in the absence of the magnetic field (left) and 5 min after SMF application (right; same patch). The number of the open channels (O1–11) is indicated in the trace.
Figure 2All-atom computer model of an amyloid peptide in solution under the influence of varying strength electromagnetic fields (EMF) (from [47]), (A) exemplifies the amyloidogenic ApoC-II peptide adopting an elongated conformation under the fields higher than 0.04 V/nm due to the peptide dipole alignment along the electric field direction; (B) illustrates the peptide conformation being native-like under the fields less than 0.04 V/nm in strength. For detailed systematic analysis of the EMF field strength effects on the conformational dynamics of this peptide refer to [47]. The peptide conformation is shown as a ribbon (purple) and atomic structure in CPK representation. Water molecules near the peptide are shown explicitly in grey CPK representation and the overall solution is coloured blue. Yellow arrows represent the peptide dipole moment and black arrows represent the direction of the applied electric and magnetic field respectively.