Literature DB >> 21812009

Individual differences in the effects of mobile phone exposure on human sleep: rethinking the problem.

Sarah P Loughran1, Raymond J McKenzie, Melinda L Jackson, Mark E Howard, Rodney J Croft.   

Abstract

Mobile phone exposure-related effects on the human electroencephalogram (EEG) have been shown during both waking and sleep states, albeit with slight differences in the frequency affected. This discrepancy, combined with studies that failed to find effects, has led many to conclude that no consistent effects exist. We hypothesised that these differences might partly be due to individual variability in response, and that mobile phone emissions may in fact have large but differential effects on human brain activity. Twenty volunteers from our previous study underwent an adaptation night followed by two experimental nights in which they were randomly exposed to two conditions (Active and Sham), followed by a full-night sleep episode. The EEG spectral power was increased in the sleep spindle frequency range in the first 30 min of non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep following Active exposure. This increase was more prominent in the participants that showed an increase in the original study. These results confirm previous findings of mobile phone-like emissions affecting the EEG during non-REM sleep. Importantly, this low-level effect was also shown to be sensitive to individual variability. Furthermore, this indicates that previous negative results are not strong evidence for a lack of an effect and, given the far-reaching implications of mobile phone research, we may need to rethink the interpretation of results and the manner in which research is conducted in this field.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21812009     DOI: 10.1002/bem.20691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  9 in total

1.  Radiofrequency signal affects alpha band in resting electroencephalogram.

Authors:  Rania Ghosn; Lydia Yahia-Cherif; Laurent Hugueville; Antoine Ducorps; Jean-Didier Lemaréchal; György Thuróczy; René de Seze; Brahim Selmaoui
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Does the Brain Detect 3G Mobile Phone Radiation Peaks? An Explorative In-Depth Analysis of an Experimental Study.

Authors:  Suzanne Roggeveen; Jim van Os; Richel Lousberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Bioelectromagnetics Research within an Australian Context: The Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research (ACEBR).

Authors:  Sarah P Loughran; Md Shahriar Al Hossain; Alan Bentvelzen; Mark Elwood; John Finnie; Joseph Horvat; Steve Iskra; Elena P Ivanova; Jim Manavis; Chathuranga Keerawella Mudiyanselage; Alireza Lajevardipour; Boris Martinac; Robert McIntosh; Raymond McKenzie; Mislav Mustapic; Yoshitaka Nakayama; Elena Pirogova; M Harunur Rashid; Nigel A Taylor; Nevena Todorova; Peter M Wiedemann; Robert Vink; Andrew Wood; Irene Yarovsky; Rodney J Croft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure and the Resting EEG: Exploring the Thermal Mechanism Hypothesis.

Authors:  Sarah P Loughran; Adam Verrender; Anna Dalecki; Catriona A Burdon; Kyoko Tagami; Joonhee Park; Nigel A S Taylor; Rodney J Croft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Short-term radiofrequency exposure from new generation mobile phones reduces EEG alpha power with no effects on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Vecsei; Balázs Knakker; Péter Juhász; György Thuróczy; Attila Trunk; István Hernádi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness.

Authors:  Christopher Höhn; Sarah R Schmid; Christina P Plamberger; Kathrin Bothe; Monika Angerer; Georg Gruber; Belinda Pletzer; Kerstin Hoedlmoser
Journal:  Clocks Sleep       Date:  2021-01-22

7.  Exposure to 1800 MHz LTE electromagnetic fields under proinflammatory conditions decreases the response strength and increases the acoustic threshold of auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Julie Lameth; Quentin Gaucher; Délia Arnaud-Cormos; Philippe Lévêque; Jean-Marc Edeline; Michel Mallat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Adolescents' Memory Performance and Individual Brain Dose of Microwave Radiation from Wireless Communication.

Authors:  Milena Foerster; Arno Thielens; Wout Joseph; Marloes Eeftens; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses.

Authors:  Maël Dieudonné
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.