Literature DB >> 27163281

The Effects of Precautionary Messages about Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones and Base Stations Revisited: The Role of Recipient Characteristics.

Christoph Boehmert1,2, Peter Wiedemann3, Jonathon Pye3,4, Rodney Croft2,5.   

Abstract

Precautionary messages have been shown to increase recipients' threat perceptions about radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) emitted by mobile phones and mobile phone base stations. The current study explored the interplay of variables on the side of message recipients with this effect. The individual difference variables of interest were gender, trait anxiety, personal need for structure, and personal fear of invalidity. Furthermore, the study determined whether the increased threat perception is accompanied by emotional distress. A total of 298 university students answered a survey after reading either a basic text about RF-EMFs or a text including precautionary information. Linear multiple regression with interactions analyses showed that the effect of precautionary messages differed for people with different levels of trait anxiety. How trait anxiety was related to the effect of precautionary messages in turn depended on participants' gender. Personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity were mostly unrelated to the effect of precautionary messages. Regarding participants' emotional distress, we found no difference in state anxiety scores between those participants who received precautionary information and those who did not. The findings show that the effects of precautionary messages on threat perception depend on individual difference variables such as recipients' trait anxiety and gender. Also, the fact that precautionary communication did not result in heightened state anxiety challenges the assumption that precautionary messages induce fear or anxiety.
© 2016 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMF; individual differences; precaution; risk communication; risk perception

Year:  2016        PMID: 27163281     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bioelectromagnetics Research within an Australian Context: The Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research (ACEBR).

Authors:  Sarah P Loughran; Md Shahriar Al Hossain; Alan Bentvelzen; Mark Elwood; John Finnie; Joseph Horvat; Steve Iskra; Elena P Ivanova; Jim Manavis; Chathuranga Keerawella Mudiyanselage; Alireza Lajevardipour; Boris Martinac; Robert McIntosh; Raymond McKenzie; Mislav Mustapic; Yoshitaka Nakayama; Elena Pirogova; M Harunur Rashid; Nigel A Taylor; Nevena Todorova; Peter M Wiedemann; Robert Vink; Andrew Wood; Irene Yarovsky; Rodney J Croft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Improving Precautionary Communication in the EMF Field? Effects of Making Messages Consistent and Explaining the Effectiveness of Precautions.

Authors:  Christoph Boehmert; Peter Wiedemann; Rodney Croft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study.

Authors:  Christoph Boehmert; Adam Verrender; Mario Pauli; Peter Wiedemann
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Wi-fi related radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF): a pilot experimental study of personal exposure and risk perception.

Authors:  Berihun M Zeleke; Christopher Brzozek; Chhavi R Bhatt; Michael J Abramson; Frederik Freudenstein; Rodney J Croft; Peter Wiedemann; Geza Benke
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-03-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.