| Literature DB >> 27686975 |
Deasy Irawati1,2,3, John C L Mamo1,2, Satvinder S Dhaliwal1,2, Mario J Soares1,2, Karin M Slivkoff-Clark1, Anthony P James4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subjects with metabolic syndrome (MetS) exhibit impaired lipoprotein metabolism and have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Although the risk is attributed primarily to the risk associated with individual components, it is also likely affected by other associated metabolic defects. Remnants of postprandial lipoproteins show potent atherogenicity in cell and animal models of insulin resistance and in pre-diabetic subjects with postprandial dyslipidemia. However, few studies have considered regulation of chylomicron remnant homeostasis in MetS per se. This study measured the plasma concentration in Caucasian men and women of small dense chylomicrons following fasting and explored associations with metabolic and anthropometric measures.Entities:
Keywords: Apolipoprotein B-48; Chylomicron; Metabolic syndrome
Year: 2016 PMID: 27686975 PMCID: PMC5043522 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0330-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Subject characteristics
| Characteristics | Total ( | No-MetS ( | MetS ( |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 68/147 | 46/129 | 22/18 |
| Age (years) | 62 (56–69) | 62 (56–68) | 66 (59–71)* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.3 ± 0.3 | 25.5 ± 0.3 | 29.9 ± 0.6** |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 87.1 ± 0.9 | 84.1 ± 1 | 100.3 ± 1.4** |
| WHR | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.01** |
| SAD (cm) | 24.7 ± 0.3 | 23.6 ± 0.3 | 29.3 ± 0.5** |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 141 ± 1 | 139 ± 2 | 150 ± 3** |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 83 ± 1 | 82 ± 1 | 85 ± 2 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.1 ± 0.03 | 1 ± 0.03 | 1.7 ± 0.1** |
| Total chol (mmol/L) | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.2 |
| LDL chol (mmol/L) | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.1 |
| HDL chol (mmol/L) | 1.5 ± 0.03 | 1.6 ± 0.03 | 1.2 ± 0.03** |
| Non-HDL chol (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.2** |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.1 (4.8–5.4) | 5.1 (4.8–5.3) | 5.6 (5.3–5.9)** |
| Insulin (mIU/L) | 6 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 8.8 ± 0.5** |
| HOMA-IR | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.04 | 2.2 ± 0.1** |
| CRP (μg/mL) | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.4** |
| ApoB-48 (μg/mL) | 4.8 (3.4–7.9) | 4.6 (3.3–7.5) | 6.8 (3.9–11.4)** |
| Metabolic parameters | Number of subjects | ||
| BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 | 129 (60 %) | 91 (52 %) | 38 (95 %) |
| Large waist | 104 (48 %) | 68 (39 %) | 36 (90 %) |
| Triglyceride ≥ 1.7 mmol/L | 31 (14 %) | 6 (3 %) | 25 (63 %) |
| Low HDL chol | 30 (14 %) | 10 (5 %) | 20 (50 %) |
| Hypertension | 147 (69 %) | 111 (63 %) | 36 (92 %) |
| Fasting glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/L | 32 (15 %) | 11 (6 %) | 21 (53 %) |
Mean ± SE for normally distributed variables or median (25th and 75th interquartile range) for non-normally distributed variables; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; MetS compared to no-MetS group. P values between groups were based on independent t-test and Mann-Whitney test for data that is normally and non-normally distributed data respectively
Concentration of apo B-48 according to MetS and in different cumulative number of MetS components
| Presence of MetS | N | Geometric mean (95 % CI) (μg/mL) |
| No-Mets | 175 | 4.7 (4.3–5.2) |
| MetS | 40 | 6.6 (5.4–8.0) |
|
| ||
| MetS components | ||
| 0 | 37 | 4.7 (3.8–5.9)a |
| 1 | 69 | 4.7 (4–5.6)a |
| 2 | 69 | 4.7 (4.1–5.3)a |
| ≥3 | 40 | 6.6 (5.4–8)b |
|
|
*p value after adjusting for age and gender
Different letters (a and b) indicate significant differences
Non-parametric correlations between anthropometric and lipid/metabolic determinants with Apo B-48 (without adjustment)
| Variables | Correlation coefficient ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n = 215) | No MetS (n = 175) | MetS (N = 40) | |
| Triglyceridea |
|
|
|
| HDL cholesterola |
|
| 0.254 ( |
| Age | − |
|
|
| Non-HDL cholesterol |
|
|
|
| WHR |
| 0.147 ( | −0.26 ( |
| Waist circumferencea |
| 0.123 ( |
|
| Systolica | −0.053 ( | −0.106 ( | −0.026 ( |
| LDL cholesterol |
| 0.094 ( |
|
| BMI | 0.105 ( | 0.078 ( | −0.27 ( |
| CRP | −0.006 ( | −0.073 ( | −0.005 ( |
| Insulin | 0.113 ( | 0.069 ( | −0.158 ( |
| Glucosea | −0.001 ( | −0.067 ( | −0.222 ( |
| SAD | 0.118 ( | 0.06 ( | −0.193 ( |
| HOMA-IR | 0.108 ( | 0.058 ( | −0.201 ( |
| Diastolica | 0.024 ( | 0.023 ( | −0.066 ( |
| Cholesterol |
| 0.021 ( |
|
The variables were presented in order based on the strength of association (strong to weak) in the no MetS group. Cells represent Spearman’s Rank correlation (p-values). Significant correlations are in bold font
aVariable use to determine the presence of MetS
The association between Z score of apo B-48 and anthropometric and lipid/metabolic determinants, after adjustment for age and gender
| Variables | Regression coefficient based on Z-scores | |
|---|---|---|
| No MetS | MetS | |
| Triglyceridea |
|
|
| Non-HDL cholesterol |
|
|
| Glucosea | −0.152 ( | −0.057 ( |
| LDL cholesterol |
|
|
| Cholesterol | 0.144 ( |
|
| HDL cholesterola | −0.132 ( | 0.154 ( |
| Waist circumferencea | 0.077 ( | −0.453 ( |
| WHR | 0.073 ( | 0.077 ( |
| Systolica | −0.064 ( | 0.06 ( |
| SAD | 0.058 ( | −0.420 ( |
| BMI | 0.053 ( |
|
| CRP | −0.039 ( | −0.153 ( |
| Insulin | 0.014 ( |
|
| Diastolica | 0.013 ( | −0.165 ( |
| HOMA-IR | −0.005 ( | −0.429 ( |
Regression coefficient represents the standard deviation change in apoB-48, as a result of 1 standard deviation change in the variable. The variables were presented in orders based on the strength of association (strong to weak) in the no MetS group. Cells represent: slope estimate (p-value for estimate, R2 for model after adjustment). Significant associations are in bold font
aVariable use to determine the presence of MetS