Literature DB >> 21291742

The importance of non-HDL cholesterol reporting in lipid management.

Michael J Blaha1, Roger S Blumenthal, Eliot A Brinton, Terry A Jacobson.   

Abstract

Plasma levels of lipids and lipoproteins are essential to the management of lipid disorders by generalists and by practitioners of the emerging specialty of clinical lipidology. The routine lipid panel consists of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides. Several additional lipid parameters are emerging as potentially valuable adjuncts to the standard panel, including measurements of apolipoproteins and LDL particle size and concentration, but most of these serve mainly as research tools at present. One major exception is non-HDL-C, which is readily available for routine clinical use. This review outlines some of the numerous research studies that clearly establish the clinical utility and even preeminence of non-HDL-C as a comprehensive measure of atherogenic lipoproteins. Non-HDL-C was highlighted as a key secondary goal of therapy several years ago in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III national lipid treatment guidelines and recently was further emphasized as a major goal of therapy in the consensus guidelines for lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology. Non-HDL-C is superior to LDL-C for the prediction of cardiovascular events and has many other compelling advantages over LDL-C and other traditional lipid parameters. Importantly, it can be calculated directly from values in routine lipid panels, at no added expense. It is our opinion that non-HDL-C should be reported on all routine lipid profiles and used regularly in the management of dyslipidemia for optimal prevention of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21291742     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lipidol        ISSN: 1876-4789            Impact factor:   4.766


  47 in total

1.  Using apolipoprotein B to manage dyslipidemic patients: time for a change?

Authors:  Charles R Harper; Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Non-HDL cholesterol as a metric of good quality of care: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Salim S Virani
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

3.  Continuous decline in mortality from coronary heart disease in Japan despite a continuous and marked rise in total cholesterol: Japanese experience after the Seven Countries Study.

Authors:  Akira Sekikawa; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Katsuyuki Miura; Kunihiro Nishimura; Bradley J Willcox; Kamal H Masaki; Beatriz Rodriguez; Russell P Tracy; Tomonori Okamura; Lewis H Kuller
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Ability of traditional lipid ratios and apolipoprotein ratios to predict cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M-R Taskinen; P J Barter; C Ehnholm; D R Sullivan; K Mann; J Simes; J D Best; S Hamwood; A C Keech
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  To B or not to B: is non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol an adequate surrogate for apolipoprotein B?

Authors:  Carl J Lavie; Richard V Milani; James H O'Keefe
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Relation of cholesterol and lipoprotein parameters with carotid artery plaque characteristics: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) carotid MRI study.

Authors:  Salim S Virani; Diane J Catellier; Lisa A Pompeii; Vijay Nambi; Ron C Hoogeveen; Bruce A Wasserman; Josef Coresh; Thomas H Mosley; James D Otvos; A Richey Sharrett; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie M Ballantyne
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 5.162

7.  Lipoprotein Biomarkers and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paramjit K Sandhu; Salma M A Musaad; Alan T Remaley; Stephanie S Buehler; Sonya Strider; James H Derzon; Hubert W Vesper; Anne Ranne; Colleen S Shaw; Robert H Christenson
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2016-08-01

8.  Barriers to non-HDL cholesterol goal attainment by providers.

Authors:  Salim S Virani; Lynne Steinberg; Tyler Murray; Smita Negi; Vijay Nambi; LeChauncy D Woodard; Biykem Bozkurt; Laura A Petersen; Christie M Ballantyne
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integration of new data, evolving views, revised goals, and role of rosuvastatin in management. A comprehensive survey.

Authors:  Richard Kones
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 10.  Comparing the new European cardiovascular disease prevention guideline with prior American Heart Association guidelines: an editorial review.

Authors:  Van-Khue Ton; Seth S Martin; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.