Literature DB >> 17957034

Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage.

Ranganath Muniyappa1, Sihoon Lee, Hui Chen, Michael J Quon.   

Abstract

Insulin resistance contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetes and is a hallmark of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and many cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, quantifying insulin sensitivity/resistance in humans and animal models is of great importance for epidemiological studies, clinical and basic science investigations, and eventual use in clinical practice. Direct and indirect methods of varying complexity are currently employed for these purposes. Some methods rely on steady-state analysis of glucose and insulin, whereas others rely on dynamic testing. Each of these methods has distinct advantages and limitations. Thus, optimal choice and employment of a specific method depends on the nature of the studies being performed. Established direct methods for measuring insulin sensitivity in vivo are relatively complex. The hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp and the insulin suppression test directly assess insulin-mediated glucose utilization under steady-state conditions that are both labor and time intensive. A slightly less complex indirect method relies on minimal model analysis of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Finally, simple surrogate indexes for insulin sensitivity/resistance are available (e.g., QUICKI, HOMA, 1/insulin, Matusda index) that are derived from blood insulin and glucose concentrations under fasting conditions (steady state) or after an oral glucose load (dynamic). In particular, the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) has been validated extensively against the reference standard glucose clamp method. QUICKI is a simple, robust, accurate, reproducible method that appropriately predicts changes in insulin sensitivity after therapeutic interventions as well as the onset of diabetes. In this Frontiers article, we highlight merits, limitations, and appropriate use of current in vivo measures of insulin sensitivity/resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17957034     DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00645.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0193-1849            Impact factor:   4.310


  442 in total

1.  Cumulative soft drink consumption is associated with insulin resistance in Mexican adults.

Authors:  Berenice Rivera-Paredez; Leticia Torres-Ibarra; Romina González-Morales; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Rubí Hernández-López; Paula Ramírez; Leith León-Maldonado; Rafael Velázquez-Cruz; Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez; Jorge Salmerón
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Opportunities for using lipoprotein subclass profile by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in assessing insulin resistance and diabetes prediction.

Authors:  Alexis C Frazier-Wood; W Timothy Garvey; Tara Dall; Robert Honigberg; Ray Pourfarzib
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 3.  Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and insulin sensitivity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Julius S Ngwa; James B Meigs; Luc Djoussé
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Acute effect of 30 min of accumulated versus continuous brisk walking on insulin sensitivity in young Asian adults.

Authors:  Mei Chan Yap; Govindasamy Balasekaran; Stephen F Burns
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Endogenous sex hormones, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes in men and women.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; Jeffrey B Halter
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Dissociation of hyperglycemia from altered vascular contraction and relaxation mechanisms in caveolin-1 null mice.

Authors:  Luminita H Pojoga; Tham M Yao; Lauren A Opsasnick; Amanda E Garza; Ossama M Reslan; Gail K Adler; Gordon H Williams; Raouf A Khalil
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Insulin-sensitive obese children display a favorable metabolic profile.

Authors:  Rade Vukovic; Katarina Mitrovic; Tatjana Milenkovic; Sladjana Todorovic; Ivan Soldatovic; Sandra Sipetic-Grujicic; Dragan Zdravkovic
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Absence of Endothelial ERα Results in Arterial Remodeling and Decreased Stiffness in Western Diet-Fed Male Mice.

Authors:  Camila Manrique-Acevedo; Francisco I Ramirez-Perez; Jaume Padilla; Victoria J Vieira-Potter; Annayya R Aroor; Brady J Barron; Dongqing Chen; Dominic Haertling; Cory Declue; James R Sowers; Luis A Martinez-Lemus
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  In vivo analysis of γH2AX+ cells in skeletal muscle from aged and obese humans.

Authors:  Cory M Dungan; Bailey D Peck; R Grace Walton; Zhengyan Huang; Marcas M Bamman; Philip A Kern; Charlotte A Peterson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  The influence of the brain-derived neurotropic factor Val66Met genotype and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on insulin resistance in the schizophrenia and bipolar populations.

Authors:  K J Burghardt; R Pop-Busui; M J Bly; T B Grove; S F Taylor; V L Ellingrod
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.