Literature DB >> 27686352

The effects of performance status one week before hospital admission on the outcomes of critically ill patients.

Fernando G Zampieri1,2, Fernando A Bozza3,4, Giulliana M Moralez3,5, Débora D S Mazza6, Alexandre V Scotti7, Marcelo S Santino8, Rubens A B Ribeiro9, Edison M Rodrigues Filho10, Maurício M Cabral11, Marcelo O Maia12, Patrícia S D'Alessandro13, Sandro V Oliveira14, Márcia A M Menezes15, Eliana B Caser16, Roberto S Lannes17, Meton S Alencar Neto18, Maristela M Machado19, Marcelo F Sousa20, Jorge I F Salluh3,21, Marcio Soares22,23.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of performance status (PS) impairment 1 week before hospital admission on the outcomes in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU).
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in 59,693 patients (medical admissions, 67 %) admitted to 78 ICUs during 2013. We classified PS impairment according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale in absent/minor (PS = 0-1), moderate (PS = 2) or severe (PS = 3-4). We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to investigate the association between PS impairment and hospital mortality.
RESULTS: PS impairment was moderate in 17.3 % and severe in 6.9 % of patients. The hospital mortality was 14.4 %. Overall, the worse the PS, the higher the ICU and hospital mortality and length of stay. In addition, patients with worse PS were less frequently discharged home. PS impairment was associated with worse outcomes in all SAPS 3, Charlson Comorbidity Index and age quartiles as well as according to the admission type. Adjusting for other relevant clinical characteristics, PS impairment was associated with higher hospital mortality (odds-ratio (OR) = 1.96 (95 % CI 1.63-2.35), for moderate and OR = 4.22 (3.32-5.35), for severe impairment). The effects of PS on the outcome were particularly relevant in the medium range of severity-of-illness. These results were consistent in the subgroup analyses. However, adding PS impairment to the SAPS 3 score improved only slightly its discriminative capability.
CONCLUSION: PS impairment was associated with worse outcomes independently of other markers of chronic health status, particularly for patients in the medium range of severity of illness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Markers of baseline health status; Outcomes; Performance status

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27686352     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4563-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  29 in total

1.  Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Olga V Demler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Intensive care in patients with lung cancer: a multinational study.

Authors:  M Soares; A-C Toffart; J-F Timsit; G Burghi; C Irrazábal; N Pattison; E Tobar; B F C Almeida; U V A Silva; L C P Azevedo; A Rabbat; C Lamer; A Parrot; V C Souza-Dantas; F Wallet; F Blot; G Bourdin; C Piras; J Delemazure; M Durand; D Tejera; J I F Salluh; E Azoulay
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Reporting and handling missing values in clinical studies in intensive care units.

Authors:  Aurélien Vesin; Elie Azoulay; Stéphane Ruckly; Lucile Vignoud; Kateřina Rusinovà; Dominique Benoit; Marcio Soares; Paulo Azeivedo-Maia; Fekri Abroug; Judith Benbenishty; Jean Francois Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Impact of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status on hospital mortality in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Chi-Min Park; Younsuck Koh; Kyeongman Jeon; Sungwon Na; Chae-Man Lim; Won-Il Choi; Young-Joo Lee; Seok Chan Kim; Gyu Rak Chon; Je Hyeong Kim; Jae Yeol Kim; Jaemin Lim; Chin Kook Rhee; Sunghoon Park; Ho Cheol Kim; Jin Hwa Lee; Ji Hyun Lee; Jisook Park; Juhee Cho; Shin Ok Koh; Gee Young Suh
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 5.  Key concepts and limitations of statistical methods for evaluating biomarkers of kidney disease.

Authors:  Chirag R Parikh; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 9.  Net reclassification indices for evaluating risk prediction instruments: a critical review.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Zheyu Wang; Holly Janes; Robyn L McClelland; Bruce M Psaty; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Colin B Begg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  27 in total

1.  Modulators of systemic inflammatory response syndrome presence in patients admitted to intensive care units with acute infection: a Bayesian network approach.

Authors:  Fernando G Zampieri; Fernanda J Aguiar; Fernando A Bozza; Jorge I F Salluh; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  What were you able to do in your daily life? Performance status for the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Maurizia Capuzzo; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Ignacio Martin-Loeches
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The 10 signs telling me that my cancer patient in the emergency department is at high risk of becoming critically ill.

Authors:  Olivier Peyrony; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Will my patient survive? Look for creatinine in the urine!

Authors:  Michael Darmon; Kianoush Kashani; Miet Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  The ICM research agenda on intensive care unit-acquired weakness.

Authors:  Nicola Latronico; Margaret Herridge; Ramona O Hopkins; Derek Angus; Nicholas Hart; Greet Hermans; Theodore Iwashyna; Yaseen Arabi; Giuseppe Citerio; E. Wesley Ely; Jesse Hall; Sangeeta Mehta; Kathleen Puntillo; Johannes Van den Hoeven; Hannah Wunsch; Deborah Cook; Claudia Dos Santos; Gordon Rubenfeld; Jean-Louis Vincent; Greet Van den Berghe; Elie Azoulay; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  ICU staffing feature phenotypes and their relationship with patients' outcomes: an unsupervised machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Fernando G Zampieri; Jorge I F Salluh; Luciano C P Azevedo; Jeremy M Kahn; Lucas P Damiani; Lunna P Borges; William N Viana; Roberto Costa; Thiago D Corrêa; Dieter E S Araya; Marcelo O Maia; Marcus A Ferez; Alexandre G R Carvalho; Marcos F Knibel; Ulisses O Melo; Marcelo S Santino; Thiago Lisboa; Eliana B Caser; Bruno A M P Besen; Fernando A Bozza; Derek C Angus; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU.

Authors:  H Flaatten; D W de Lange; A Artigas; D Bin; R Moreno; S Christensen; G M Joynt; Sean M Bagshaw; C L Sprung; D Benoit; M Soares; B Guidet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  The Intensive Care Medicine research agenda on critically ill oncology and hematology patients.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Peter Schellongowski; Michael Darmon; Philippe R Bauer; Dominique Benoit; Pieter Depuydt; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Virginie Lemiale; Maarten van Vliet; Anne-Pascale Meert; Djamel Mokart; Stephen M Pastores; Anders Perner; Frédéric Pène; Peter Pickkers; Kathryn A Puxty; Francois Vincent; Jorge Salluh; Ayman O Soubani; Massimo Antonelli; Thomas Staudinger; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Trends in clinical profiles, organ support use and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring unplanned ICU admission: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Fernando G Zampieri; Thiago G Romano; Jorge I F Salluh; Leandro U Taniguchi; Pedro V Mendes; Antonio P Nassar; Roberto Costa; William N Viana; Marcelo O Maia; Mariza F A Lima; Sylas B Cappi; Alexandre G R Carvalho; Fernando V C De Marco; Marcelo S Santino; Eric Perecmanis; Fabio G Miranda; Grazielle V Ramos; Aline R Silva; Paulo M Hoff; Fernando A Bozza; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Association of frailty with short-term outcomes, organ support and resource use in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Fernando G Zampieri; Theodore J Iwashyna; Elizabeth M Viglianti; Leandro U Taniguchi; William N Viana; Roberto Costa; Thiago D Corrêa; Carlos Eduardo N Moreira; Marcelo O Maia; Giulliana M Moralez; Thiago Lisboa; Marcus A Ferez; Carlos Eduardo F Freitas; Clayton B de Carvalho; Bruno F Mazza; Mariza F A Lima; Grazielle V Ramos; Aline R Silva; Fernando A Bozza; Jorge I F Salluh; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.