Literature DB >> 27684464

Device Life of the Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Revisited.

Jan S Lewin1, Leah M Baumgart1, Martha P Barrow1, Katherine A Hutcheson1.   

Abstract

Importance: Voice prosthesis (VP) device life is a limiting factor of tracheoesophageal (TE) voice restoration that drives patient satisfaction, health care costs, and overall burden. Historic data suggest that TE VPs have an average device life of generally 3 to 6 months, but these data are typically derived from small samples using only 1 or 2 devices. Objective: To reexamine current device life in a large, contemporary cancer hospital in the United States that uses a wide assortment of VPs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational study included 390 laryngectomized patients with a tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) who had VP management at MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 1, 2003, and December 31, 2013. Main Outcomes and Measures: Tracheoesophageal voice-related outcomes were: (1) device life duration to VP removal, and (2) treatment-related and prosthetic-related factors influencing device failure. Primary independent variables included treatment history (extent of surgery and radiation history), VP type (indwelling vs nonindwelling, size, specialty features), and reason for removal (leakage, complication, other). Duration was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Disease, treatment, and patient-specific factors were analyzed as predictors of duration.
Results: Overall, 3648 VPs were placed in the 390 patients (median [range] age, 62 [34-92] years). Indwelling prostheses accounted for more than half (56%) of the devices placed (55%, 20-Fr diameter; 33%, 8-mm length). More than two-thirds (69%) of prostheses were removed because of leakage, while the rest were removed for other reasons. Median device life was 61 days for all prostheses. Indwelling and nonindwelling VPs had median device lives of 70 and 38 days, respectively. There was no significant difference between specialty prostheses compared with standard devices (median duration, 61 vs 70 days, respectively). The Provox ActiValve (Atos Medical) had the longest life. Neither radiation therapy nor extent of surgery had a meaningful impact on device life. Conclusions and Relevance: Our data suggest that VP duration demonstrates a lower durability than historically reported. This may reflect the intensification of treatment regimens that complicate TEP management in an era of organ preservation; however, further investigation is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27684464      PMCID: PMC5322740          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  16 in total

1.  Incidence and outcomes of stricture formation postlaryngectomy.

Authors:  Larissa Sweeny; J Blake Golden; Hilliary N White; J Scott Magnuson; William R Carroll; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Multi-institutional assessment of the Provox 2 voice prosthesis.

Authors:  A H Ackerstaff; F J Hilgers; C A Meeuwis; L A van der Velden; F J van den Hoogen; H A Marres; G C Vreeburg; J J Manni
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-02

3.  Determining the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the ActiValve: results of a long-term prospective trial.

Authors:  Donna J Graville; Andrew D Palmer; Peter E Andersen; James I Cohen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Clinical application of the Provox NiD voice prosthesis: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jan S Lewin; Martha A Portwood; Yijia Wang; Katherine A Hutcheson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Effect of dairy products on the lifetime of Provox2 voice prostheses in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Leonora Q Schwandt; Ranny van Weissenbruch; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher; Frans W J Albers
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Prospective clinical phase II study of two new indwelling voice prostheses (Provox Vega 22.5 and 20 Fr) and a novel anterograde insertion device (Provox Smart Inserter).

Authors:  Frans J M Hilgers; Annemieke H Ackerstaff; Irene Jacobi; Alfons J M Balm; I Bing Tan; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  [Clinical use of a voice prosthesis with a flap valve containing silver oxide (Blom-Singer Advantage), biofilm formation, in-situ lifetime and indication].

Authors:  P Kress; P Schäfer; F-P Schwerdtfeger
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 1.057

8.  Long-term results of Provox ActiValve, solving the problem of frequent candida- and "underpressure"-related voice prosthesis replacements.

Authors:  Jessica Soolsma; Michiel W van den Brekel; Annemieke H Ackerstaff; Alfons J Balm; Bing Tan; Frans J Hilgers
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Prospective randomized comparative study of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: Blom-Singer versus Provox.

Authors:  K Delsupehe; I Zink; M Lejaegere; P Delaere
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Device life of the Provox Vega voice prosthesis.

Authors:  Kelli L Hancock; Nadine R Lawson; Elizabeth C Ward
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  12 in total

1.  Provox 2® and Provox Vega® device life-time: a case-crossover study with multivariate analysis of possible influential factors and duration.

Authors:  Miguel Mayo-Yáñez; Irma Cabo-Varela; Loredana Dovalo-Carballo; Christian Calvo-Henríquez; Alejandro Martínez-Morán; Jesús Herranz González-Botas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Analysis of Factors Affecting the Longevity of Voice Prosthesis Following Total Laryngectomy with a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Arvind Krishnamurthy; Suhaildeen Khwajamohiuddin
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-06

3.  Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a magnet-based valve voice prosthesis for endoprosthesis leakage treatment.

Authors:  Miguel Mayo-Yáñez; Carlos Chiesa-Estomba; Jérôme R Lechien; Christian Calvo-Henríquez; Luigi A Vaira; Irma Cabo-Varela
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Voice-Related Quality of Life in Post-Laryngectomy Rehabilitation: Tracheoesophageal Fistula's Wellness.

Authors:  Salvatore Cocuzza; Antonino Maniaci; Calogero Grillo; Salvatore Ferlito; Giacomo Spinato; Salvatore Coco; Federico Merlino; Giovanna Stilo; Giovanni Paolo Santoro; Giannicola Iannella; Claudio Vicini; Ignazio La Mantia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Postlaryngectomy prosthetic voice rehabilitation outcomes in a consecutive cohort of 232 patients over a 13-year period.

Authors:  Japke F Petersen; Liset Lansaat; Adriana J Timmermans; Vincent van der Noort; Frans J M Hilgers; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Solving periprosthetic leakage with a novel prosthetic device.

Authors:  Japke F Petersen; Liset Lansaat; Frans Hilgers; Michiel van den Brekel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  A Single Voice Prosthesis Utilized For 17 Years.

Authors:  Ahmet Mutlu; Erdem Koroglu; Selvet Erdogan
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11

8.  Evaluation of combined growth media for in vitro cultivation of oropharyngeal biofilms on prosthetic silicone.

Authors:  M Leonhard; B Zatorska; D Moser; Y Tan; B Schneider-Stickler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care.

Authors:  Miren Taberna; Francisco Gil Moncayo; Enric Jané-Salas; Maite Antonio; Lorena Arribas; Esther Vilajosana; Elisabet Peralvez Torres; Ricard Mesía
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis management in laryngectomy patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  David P Goldstein; Gilbert Ralph; John R de Almeida; Ashok R Jethwa; Jonathan Irish; Douglas B Chepeha; Dale Brown; Patrick Gullane; John Waldron; Elana Aziza; Lisa Durkin
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.