Literature DB >> 27683552

Hyperelastic "bone": A highly versatile, growth factor-free, osteoregenerative, scalable, and surgically friendly biomaterial.

Adam E Jakus1, Alexandra L Rutz2, Sumanas W Jordan3, Abhishek Kannan4, Sean M Mitchell4, Chawon Yun4, Katie D Koube1, Sung C Yoo1, Herbert E Whiteley5, Claus-Peter Richter6, Robert D Galiano3, Wellington K Hsu7, Stuart R Stock8, Erin L Hsu7, Ramille N Shah9.   

Abstract

Despite substantial attention given to the development of osteoregenerative biomaterials, severe deficiencies remain in current products. These limitations include an inability to adequately, rapidly, and reproducibly regenerate new bone; high costs and limited manufacturing capacity; and lack of surgical ease of handling. To address these shortcomings, we generated a new, synthetic osteoregenerative biomaterial, hyperelastic "bone" (HB). HB, which is composed of 90 weight % (wt %) hydroxyapatite and 10 wt % polycaprolactone or poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), could be rapidly three-dimensionally (3D) printed (up to 275 cm(3)/hour) from room temperature extruded liquid inks. The resulting 3D-printed HB exhibited elastic mechanical properties (~32 to 67% strain to failure, ~4 to 11 MPa elastic modulus), was highly absorbent (50% material porosity), supported cell viability and proliferation, and induced osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells cultured in vitro over 4 weeks without any osteo-inducing factors in the medium. We evaluated HB in vivo in a mouse subcutaneous implant model for material biocompatibility (7 and 35 days), in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model for new bone formation (8 weeks), and in a large, non-human primate calvarial defect case study (4 weeks). HB did not elicit a negative immune response, became vascularized, quickly integrated with surrounding tissues, and rapidly ossified and supported new bone growth without the need for added biological factors.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27683552     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf7704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  61 in total

Review 1.  Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Noam Eliaz; Noah Metoki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Tissue Engineering Strategies for the Treatment of Joint Damage.

Authors:  Makeda K Stephenson; Ashley L Farris; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Biomimetic Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Johnathan Ng; Kara Spiller; Jonathan Bernhard; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Biomaterials: 'Bones' made with 3D printer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  3D-Printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Adam E Jakus; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Chawon Yun; Gurmit Singh; Andrew D Schneider; Karina M Katchko; Carmen Soriano; Michael Newton; Tristan Maerz; Xin Li; Kevin Baker; Wellington K Hsu; Ramille N Shah; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Effect of Electron Beam Sterilization on Three-Dimensional-Printed Polycaprolactone/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Arnaud Bruyas; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Sungwoo Kim; David W Lowenberg; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gareth Turnbull; Jon Clarke; Frédéric Picard; Philip Riches; Luanluan Jia; Fengxuan Han; Bin Li; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 8.  Recent Research Advances in Biologic Bone Graft Materials for Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Mark A Plantz; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

9.  Three-dimensional nano-architected scaffolds with tunable stiffness for efficient bone tissue growth.

Authors:  Alessandro Maggi; Hanqing Li; Julia R Greer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Three-dimensional Printing of Multilayered Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Jason L Guo; Anthony Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 31.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.